英基 vs 喇沙 - 小一選校

chumiguan

Rank: 5 Rank: 5


	1306

322^#

發表於 17-1-12 00:42 |只看該作者

CarmanEE 發表於 17-1-11 19:22
係你未見過傳統名校班真正叻仔叻女

Sorry 我唔知你所謂未見過係指邊啲。我自問身邊個個同學都好叻。我會考班同班同學, 5班之中係最叻嗰班(F.3升F.4分班時最叻嗰20%入我班)85%以上係25分, 50%上人27分。我在Form3 左右已用完了讀書精力, F.4/5 每況愈下。Form 1-3 係班內中上。P.4-6 係班內Top 10。P.1-3 係頭1-3。就係咁, 讀書生涯唔知攞咗啲乜。呢個係我自身經歷share 我的睇法, 唔明點解你要問我識唔識其他人。

Monstereasy

Rank: 5 Rank: 5


	1216

323^#

發表於 17-1-12 01:12 |只看該作者

引用：Quote:原帖由+Monstereasy+於+17-01-11+發

原帖由 晴晴小B 於 17-01-11 發表
SPCC舊年出左30個醫生，而DBS有20個，相信唔少係經IB考入。而SPCC呢啲本地傳統名校開辦既IB課程，亦肯定比 ...

以IB公開試成績來看，本地名校尖子當然優秀，但一般國際學校學生也達平均36分，而香港大學對IB學分入學要求為30分，假若只以公開試成績來看，多於一半國際學校學生成績能達致入學水平，相信用"非不能也，實不為也"形容國際學校學生對選擇本地大學情況，可能較為合適。
http://www.aal.hku.hk/admissions/international/admissions-information?page=en/university-entrance-requirements

AAATT

別墅

Rank: 4


	673

324^#

發表於 17-1-12 02:00 |只看該作者

回覆樓主:

I am an in house lawyer, work in american and european ibank for more than 10 years. I studied in local school, never studied abroad. I choose local school for my kids, reason being i dont familiar with international school education system, although i am not native, i am doing well in my current job. I am also afriad my kids will be too wild and 反叛 if studied in IS. In fact I find local school graduates at my generation, thier foundation work is much better than those from overseas. 但現在的教育也真的頗深，所以我也会struggle whether should study in IS. What i can tell 樓主is that chinese is very important nowadays and likely in the future as well if u will work in hk. ISF Chinese should no doubt ok, but esf? I really not sure. What i heard is that their chinese is really soso. My plan is 順其自然，有免費書讀点解要spend 咁多去玩and hea, 仲要出去補中文。在local讀得有几辛苦都睇家長有几介意成績，十几年後係点，中文or english more important no one knows! Anyway 我都唔知study in local or IS is better, 所以先上黎刨文, 暫时未見到好convincing reason我要讀IS... :)

964000

伯爵府

Rank: 8 Rank: 8


	15774

325^#

發表於 17-1-12 06:13 |只看該作者

I do think Chinese is really important in the future. One of the fact is for ESF kids they usually got no interest in Chinese at all so it's hard for them to learn it well generally. They rarely read Chinese books. To my surprise, some, even don't speak Cantonese at all even parents speak Cantonese to them at home. For this group it's probably harder to find job here. SIS and ISF Chinese are good, comparable to local. Also schools like FIS and GSIS require to study french or German, so Chinese will become third language , GSIS even started Chinese at p4. I think people will need to almost forgo Chinese or get heavy tutuition if they get into these. Problem is the kid got little interest and incentives in reading and learning chinese so that's the tricky part.

Rank: 5 Rank: 5


	1703

326^#

發表於 17-1-12 06:16 |只看該作者

引用：I+am+an+in+house+lawyer,+work+in+america

原帖由 AAATT 於 17-01-12 發表
I am an in house lawyer, work in american and european ibank for more than 10 years. I studied in lo ...

Really? To set a good example, please correct the various grammatical mistakes in your passage to make it more convincing. Thank you for your sharing anyway.

Rank: 5 Rank: 5


	1703

327^#

發表於 17-1-12 06:45 |只看該作者

引用：I+do+think+Chinese+is+really+important+i

原帖由 964000 於 17-01-12 發表
I do think Chinese is really important in the future. One of the fact is for ESF kids they usually g ...

As long as the student speaks fluent Mandarin, he will be fine in the big firms we are talking about. It is not necessary to have the level of Chinese literacy required in local school nowadays, unless the world language will change to Chinese in future, where all written correspondence will be in Chinese. If that's the case, learning simplified Chinese is better.

Rank: 5 Rank: 5


	1703

328^#

發表於 17-1-12 06:52 |只看該作者

引用：Quote:原帖由+964000+於+17-01-12+發表I+do

原帖由 hkparent 於 17-01-12 發表
As long as the student speaks fluent Mandarin, he will be fine in the big firms we are talking about ...

Having said that, you do take some risks if your kid studies in IS but does not have a foreign passport. Apart from the big jobs, most local jobs in Hong Kong (government, local firms) do require much Chinese. If he has a foreign passport, he can choose whether to work in Hong Kong or overseas. But if he doesn't, he has to work in Hk but his choice of jobs will be limited.

964000

伯爵府

Rank: 8 Rank: 8


	15774

329^#

發表於 17-1-12 07:15 |只看該作者

hkparent 發表於 17-1-12 06:45
As long as the student speaks fluent Mandarin, he will be fine in the big firms we are talking about ...

True But I think it's always good to speak more languages if you have the chance to learn. Like my friend's daughter who is in GSIS now she said she wanted to be a doctor, but she can't speak Cantonese and I think her development in HK will be much limited. Sorry has to quote the example of " doctor" again.

jumphigh

禁止訪問


	2798

330^#

發表於 17-1-12 07:38 |只看該作者

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

jumphigh

禁止訪問


	2798

331^#

發表於 17-1-12 07:52 |只看該作者

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

Rank: 5 Rank: 5


	1703

332^#

發表於 17-1-12 07:54 |只看該作者

引用：Quote:hkparent+發表於+17-1-12+06:52+ Hav

原帖由 jumphigh 於 17-01-12 發表
本帖最後由 jumphigh 於 17-1-12 07:41 編輯

真係叻何愁冇發展机会？唔叻嘅英文native又如何？有外個pa ...

I'm sorry to see such a response, which is like saying something simply for the sake of arguing, or 'childish' (forgive me using this word). What is your point and does it add any value to this discussion? Do you express like this in your organization?

Rank: 5 Rank: 5


	1703

333^#

發表於 17-1-12 07:57 |只看該作者

引用：Quote:hkparent+發表於+17-1-12+06:45+ As+

原帖由 jumphigh 於 17-01-12 發表
中國文学，学的是文化修養，不是勢利的用來揾工，要有用要揾钱那不如幼稚園開始教工商管理？简体字唔驶学 ...

Agree with you on this point. That's why I'm happy to see so many international schools now offer the option of traditional Chinese teaching to students.

Moonlight819

Rank: 5 Rank: 5


	3583

334^#

發表於 17-1-12 08:10 |只看該作者

happynewyear16 發表於 17-1-11 23:57
有背景人仕未得law，不過呢批後生仔女好多好早已放洋

如果講networking, 一定ESF好過LS! LS不是DBS,只是津校，老實說有錢有地位的家長很多也會選擇國際或直資學校，較少選擇津校！

jumphigh

禁止訪問


	2798

335^#

發表於 17-1-12 08:27 |只看該作者

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

dbchu

Rank: 5 Rank: 5


	1402

336^#

發表於 17-1-12 08:46 |只看該作者

係叻嘅讀乜都叻

宮二

Rank: 5 Rank: 5


	2479

337^#

發表於 17-1-12 08:53 |只看該作者

引用：Quote:hkparent+發表於+17-1-12+06:45+ As+

原帖由 jumphigh 於 17-01-12 發表
中國文学，学的是文化修養，不是勢利的用來揾工，要有用要揾钱那不如幼稚園開始教工商管理？简体字唔驶学 ...

講得有道理。學校教中文是教中國文化修養，小時候背文言文，實際是讓學生欣賞到中文的優美。現在唔駛讀，更甚是文字棄繁取簡，是學生的損失。呢d文化層面的教育是要靠從小浸淫，外補補不來的，也最好用繁體字來學，至少有小六程度，之後入IS或放洋至理想。
當然很多家長只對英語推崇備至，覺得學太多中文是多餘。
我有朋友的孩子英國出生，小學跟父母回流香港讀ESF, 當時也學不到什麼中文，只說英語，後來讀大學時不知怎的開始要找身份認同，才倒過來自己不斷要去找課程學中文。

chumiguan

Rank: 5 Rank: 5


	1306

338^#

發表於 17-1-12 09:01 |只看該作者

所以唔知自己小朋友係咪叻, 只想佢唔會成為班裏最差無自信無學習探索精神, 無機會develop interests only focus on academic, therefore choose IS.

retriever

珍珠宮

Rank: 11


	30533

339^#

發表於 17-1-12 09:07 |只看該作者

CarmanEE 發表於 17-1-11 20:00
你睇讀到書既名人／富二代都選傳統名校，讀唔到書咪國際學校或去外國讀書囉

...

兩睇。

好似D 望族，老當家仲健在，似乎較希望子孫去傳統學校，可能希望保持某D 價值觀，守業重要。超人兩個仔讀傳統，本來都安排長孫讀傳統。白手興家既，好似呀蟲呀龍兩位，佢哋唔會無得揀，都係讀完傳統先轉去國際。

某程度，係擁抱傳統價值既人，更傾向傳統學校。

眼睇香江八卦名流圈，富三代更傾向揀國際路線。