用戶登入
用戶名稱:
密      碼:
搜索
教育王國 討論區 幼校討論 請問有冇公屋家庭入到sc呢?
樓主: 貓女
go

請問有冇公屋家庭入到sc呢? [複製鏈接]

Rank: 5Rank: 5


1266
61#
發表於 09-12-19 15:46 |只看該作者
abinayam, 你太反應敏感吧,這裡發言的家長從來沒完全否定學校的重要性,又沒有抹殺老師的存在價值,返kg必須,做家長都很清楚群體生活的重要,是家長沒可能教導的。


804
62#
發表於 09-12-19 16:47 |只看該作者
提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽

Rank: 5Rank: 5


1266
63#
發表於 09-12-19 16:51 |只看該作者
原帖由 xx33 於 09-12-19 16:47 發表
我只係覺SC收既都係大仔多, 同埋只係睇果幾分鐘INTERVIEW都唔代表係咩!!  大家唔好因為呢件事而再去搵點解, 外面都大把好學校架!!

雖然我都係入唔到SC, 但我有一次去playgroup, 有個家長個仔, 行去我前面, 咩都唔講 ...
我又咁睇喎,大細仔唔係最大關鍵,我個仔都係細仔12/06,又入到sc。小朋友表現係重要,但家長表現更加重要。

Rank: 2


40
64#
發表於 09-12-19 22:11 |只看該作者
原帖由 abinayams 於 09-12-19 12:30 發表
知識層面自己教可能沒有問題, 但秩序, 紀律, 課室常規, 與同學協作溝通, 互相尊重和包容等態度是要在學校的群體生活中學到的, 家長很難每天提供三小時這樣的環境及訓練吧, 我不是幼稚園老師, 只是一位普通的家長, 但 ...


哎呀, abinayams, 我將我ge心肝寶貝日日交過佢o地手照顧教導, 又怎可能會輕視幼稚園教師呢!! 反而係想鼓勵大家做家長ge, 唔好看小自己.

[ 本帖最後由 gangan 於 09-12-21 23:24 編輯 ]

Rank: 5Rank: 5


1179
65#
發表於 09-12-20 23:35 |只看該作者
My girl was admitted to Victoria last year and we live in HOS estate.  

I believe they will more consider the background of the parent instead of where they live...

eg, their career and education background.  



原帖由 posagg 於 09-12-10 13:46 發表
a teacher from victoria told me that if the baby is from public housing, they won't consider.

She said there are many babies applying, why not choose some from "better" background ($$$)

[ 本帖最後由 hihicathk 於 09-12-20 23:37 編輯 ]

Rank: 3Rank: 3


117
66#
發表於 09-12-21 00:03 |只看該作者
原帖由 hihicathk 於 09-12-20 23:35 發表
My girl was admitted to Victoria last year and we live in HOS estate.  

I believe they will more consider the background of the parent instead of where they live...

eg, their career and education ba ...


但我又敢諗喎, 學校實覺得
" eg, their career and education background."
如果家長係有好的 career & education background 就不會住供屋啦!

但學校都會知道 如果寫私樓又不代表佢真的住私樓架, 都可借人地址收信啫

我覺得, 學校唔應該睇地址收生,, 但如果兩個小朋友同分的話, 學校 一定會睇家長地址收人

而家長, 應該盡量避免用供屋地址收信, 免得有不公平對待!

Rank: 5Rank: 5


1179
67#
發表於 09-12-22 01:33 |只看該作者
Yes, under the normal circumstances, ppl obtain a better career and education background should have a better living environment...

But, frankly, we should classified as the middle class and well-educated, both of us graduated from HKU and my hubby has 2 master degrees, too...

But, we still live in the HOS estate cos this flat was bought ages ago (before we get married) and it has a good location and still spacious enough.

Because, we don't have the economic borden due to the expensive mortage, we have much more resources in our kid's education.
原帖由 siupp 於 09-12-21 00:03 發表


但我又敢諗喎, 學校實覺得
" eg, their career and education background."
如果家長係有好的 career & education background 就不會住供屋啦!

但學校都會知道 如果寫私樓又不代表佢真的住私樓架, 都可借人地址收 ...

Rank: 3Rank: 3


111
68#
發表於 09-12-22 14:42 |只看該作者
My friend who lives in public housing is a small company owner and his wife is graduated from overseas university. They have same thinking as you. They know how to manage their wealth and  elimiate any unnecessary expenditures.


原帖由 hihicathk 於 09-12-22 01:33 發表
Yes, under the normal circumstances, ppl obtain a better career and education background should have a better living environment...

But, frankly, we should classified as the middle class and well-edu ...

Rank: 4


646
69#
發表於 09-12-23 00:02 |只看該作者
my friend, work in KLN Tong KG said of coz they will look the address.
1. for Pri school application was the address in 41
2. today my ppl apply many Pri school, the school fee start fr $4000/m+XXX, fprm past experience public housing >90% ppl could not afford, thus normally they will filter out the public housing

Rank: 5Rank: 5


1179
70#
發表於 09-12-23 08:07 |只看該作者
Oh really,

I think our job and education background save us... cos both of us are on managerial level while we are from good universities...

Also the estate we live is one of the most expensive HOS estate, that's why...

Rank: 4


645
71#
發表於 09-12-23 09:54 |只看該作者
其實駛乜搞到咁complicated.... 一個人的身家, 學歷, 修養, etc, etc, 加加埋埋, 會變成他的氣質, 表現在, 談吐和舉手投足之間, 在INTERVIEW時, 老師見到那個人的真身就會感受到, 張form 點寫? 好minor,好minor...

Rank: 1


30
72#
發表於 09-12-23 10:46 |只看該作者
無人敢膽講住公屋小朋友唔聰明


100% agree.

Rank: 1


30
73#
發表於 09-12-23 10:51 |只看該作者
原帖由 racoy 於 09-12-10 11:14 發表
當十個小朋友得分相同, 背景資料就會變得有決定性


100% agree. It is nothing about the kids themselves but fully commercial decision making. As SC is commercial KG, the dollar sign in their eyes make the final call.

We should NOT discriminate anyone as you could be labeled and discriminate too.

Rank: 1


30
74#
發表於 09-12-23 11:05 |只看該作者
原帖由 anntx3 於 09-12-10 11:19 發表
當同行家長得分相同,小朋友的得分才有決定性。


Well.. but I believe it is reversed for SC....

當小朋友得分相同,同行家長 and dollar sign 的得分才有決定性。 (Living areas may NOT be a key point at all.... I know a lot ppl who are millionaires living in public house. Every Chinese New Year, can't you see more than hundreds Benz, BMW, Jaguar, even RR & Bentley parking in PH  for season greeting? If I lived in PH as my root and my descendant can be millionaires, I don't mean to live there and not get into famous KG.)

Rank: 1


30
75#
發表於 09-12-23 11:12 |只看該作者
原帖由 posagg 於 09-12-10 13:46 發表
a teacher from victoria told me that if the baby is from public housing, they won't consider.

She said there are many babies applying, why not choose some from "better" background ($$$)


Thanks for telling us about this case.  It is my luck that I never consider Victoria in my list because I am very poor.

Rank: 1


30
76#
發表於 09-12-23 11:15 |只看該作者
原帖由 phoebe37 於 09-12-10 15:02 發表
住公屋都可以是有錢人, 都可以是有學識的人, 住私人樓都可以無錢, 無學識的人, 如果間幼稚園咁樣評分實在太膚淺喇!

Rank: 5Rank: 5


2663
77#
發表於 10-1-28 01:30 |只看該作者
反問一句:如果兩個form 5學生,A住公屋,讀普通band1中學;B住跑馬地,讀King屎,大家會考科科成績都一樣,敢你覺得邊個醒D呢?

Rank: 4


522
78#
發表於 10-1-28 11:31 |只看該作者
讀"KING"屎唔一定叻/醒目得過屋邨普通BAND 1 學校,如果唔係,社會上所有叻人都是名校出來啦。

無錯,名校可以幫到學生,但讀SC/DBS/LS 將來唔一定好叻,是好睇小朋友。本人認為小朋友叻唔叻,7分天生3分後天,但好學校因能提供到良好的朋輩壓力,對小朋友有好好的影響。
‹ 上一主題|下一主題