家長反思 - 看DVD學語言 反礙嬰兒學字

青青河邊草

原文章由 hkparent 於 08-1-30 13:00 發表
My baby used such English learning package for 3-4 months and was successful in the interview of a famous nursery in English when he was only 17 months.

成功interview原因有好多, 未必因為佢睇左呢set野架喎...
更何況只係三四個月??? 未講笑啦...

我既睇法都係, 你有錢咪買囉
但係, 我係果種買得起都唔會買既人
講真, 我個仔講野都好多, 主因係佢鍾意睇電視, 唔係睇bb電視, 係睇大人電視, 只有看大人電視, 才會真正學到大人溝通的語言.
佢記性好, 所以好多話都識講, 同埋會記得佢聽過既話

同埋我唔急於佢學英文
乜野唔好輸在起步點, 我唔係好信呢啲marketing的宣傳口號~~呢啲口號, 我閒時做野都作唔少....
我個仔佢係自自然然自己記得晒26個英文字母, 依家開始聽得多啲英文名詞, 亦記得一些英文讀音, 完全係佢自己記在心中的, 我唔會迫佢.

leelilili

more than agree.
Until today, I still think I'm very lucky that I did not pay such a high fee for the CHildhood Eng learning materials.
In my hubby and my believe, personal engagement is more than important in teaching someone a language. Video is also very important in providing a one-way direction for the toddlers to listen more, but don't forget that the "mouse" could never jump out from the TV set and teach the roddlers how to pronounce accurately.  But a teacher could do so.

原文章由 96117690 於 08-1-21 11:03 發表
完全同意virgobb的睇法

我認為高價錢不等於高價值,
部份家長買"數萬元"語言教材是基於虛榮心和優越感, 而肯定得益的是收佣金的教育顧問, 不是你的BB.
花大筆錢不保證會有好效果(教育局每年花數十億元公帑, 結果有 ...

hkparent

I think both learning materials and personal engagement are important. My baby uses the materials and also attends playgroup during daytime, and parents talk to him in English at night time.

Fionbrian

我的親戚都買了, 見她的女兒真的識得好英文字. 有時都會覺得有用, 不過想深一層要用幾萬買這些東西, 分明是食水深. 現在太多course和material 要家長買比bb. 這些都是marketing買了等於比錢人. 買一用普通教材我都學得合理, 但太貴就no way. 不如save 點錢等bb 將來讀書用重好呢.

Eclipse_2006

我果套係二手, 人地比既.
我覺d內容確實係幾好,  不過若要我用幾萬買, 就太過份啦.  若賣幾千或會考慮.

winchoy16888

我本人買了散庒dvd及cd都很有用‧讀卡机好有用‧但係吾係用貴果Ｄ、$3500左右有埋吉