用戶登入
用戶名稱:
密      碼:
搜索
教育王國 討論區 國際學校 VSA or Kcis
查看: 5255|回覆: 27
go

VSA or Kcis [複製鏈接]

Rank: 1


15
1#
發表於 13-3-23 16:10 |只看該作者 |倒序瀏覽 |打印
請問妳們會揀邊間?謝謝!
   1    0    0    0

Rank: 3Rank: 3


222
2#
發表於 13-3-23 19:33 |只看該作者

回覆:VSA or Kcis

Definitely VSA. The quality of the teachers and curriculum at VSA is better



Rank: 3Rank: 3


187
3#
發表於 13-3-23 23:48 |只看該作者

回覆:kafool 的帖子

VSA



Rank: 3Rank: 3


257
4#
發表於 13-5-5 00:10 |只看該作者

Definitely KCIS


726
5#
發表於 13-5-5 11:15 |只看該作者
提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽

Rank: 4


744
6#
發表於 13-5-5 13:13 |只看該作者

回覆:VSA or Kcis

Strictly speaking , one cannot compare apple with orange . KCIS is an international school with number of locals capped to a certain ratio and it is a non-profit organization . On the other hand , VSA is a local school with a PIS license . VSA can accept as many locals as they want and it is a profit organization



Rank: 8Rank: 8


19315
7#
發表於 13-5-5 17:47 |只看該作者
Littleho 發表於 13-5-5 13:13
Strictly speaking , one cannot compare apple with orange . KCIS is an international school with numb ...

Hi Littleho

Where do you get the information that VSA is a profit organisation?

Rank: 4


744
8#
發表於 13-5-5 18:25 |只看該作者

回覆:VSA or Kcis

Search EMB



Rank: 4


744
9#
發表於 13-5-5 18:42 |只看該作者

回覆:VSA or Kcis

Sorry , I made mistake . In the education department website , it only shows VSA is a private school



Rank: 11Rank: 11Rank: 11Rank: 11


32340
10#
發表於 13-5-5 22:19 |只看該作者
本帖最後由 shadeslayer 於 13-5-5 22:20 編輯
Littleho 發表於 13-5-5 13:13
Strictly speaking , one cannot compare apple with orange . KCIS is an international school with numb ...

I don't know the number of locals is capped at a certain percentage for IS, eg YCIS and Kingston are official IS in teh strictest sense and yet their Chinese/locals student ratio is very high (>70%).

The rule that governs PIS including VSA/CKY/RC/DC etc is >70% HK residents.  Not sure how to define HK residents.

The more bizzare a thing is, the less mysterious it proves to be.

Rank: 6Rank: 6


7987
11#
發表於 13-5-6 00:23 |只看該作者
回復 Littleho 的帖子

VSA is under the private independent school scheme of EDB while KCIS is a conventional private school according to EDB.

Rank: 11Rank: 11Rank: 11Rank: 11


32340
12#
發表於 13-5-6 01:29 |只看該作者

引用:回復+Littleho+的帖子 VSA+is+under+the+p

原帖由 slamai 於 13-05-06 發表
回復 Littleho 的帖子

VSA is under the private independent school scheme of EDB while KCIS is a conv ...
KCIS appears in every government documents (that i have seen) which talk about international  schools and international education in HK.  So KCIS is not just a private school. It is an IS.



The more bizzare a thing is, the less mysterious it proves to be.

Rank: 4


744
13#
發表於 13-5-6 12:50 |只看該作者

回覆:VSA or Kcis

I thought Yew Chung is licensed under PIS



點評

slamai  For secondary only but not primary.  發表於 13-5-7 00:20

Rank: 6Rank: 6


7987
14#
發表於 13-5-7 00:16 |只看該作者
回復 shadeslayer 的帖子

My understanding of international schools is a concept rather than a definition as there are different criteria in categorising schools.  I was in fact referring to EDB's webpages below previously:
http://applications.edb.gov.hk/schoolsearch/schoolinfo.aspx?langno=1&scrn=132730000223 (KCIS)
http://applications.edb.gov.hk/schoolsearch/schoolinfo.aspx?langno=1&scrn=560138000223 (VSA)

Rank: 11Rank: 11Rank: 11Rank: 11


32340
15#
發表於 13-5-7 01:52 |只看該作者

引用:回復+shadeslayer+的帖子 My+understandin

原帖由 slamai 於 13-05-07 發表
回復 shadeslayer 的帖子

My understanding of international schools is a concept rather than a defini ...
That is the local primary of KC, not the IS. There are two schools.



The more bizzare a thing is, the less mysterious it proves to be.

Rank: 7Rank: 7Rank: 7


10361
16#
發表於 13-5-7 08:44 |只看該作者

引用:I+thought+Yew+Chung+is+licensed+under+PI

原帖由 Littleho 於 13-05-06 發表
I thought Yew Chung is licensed under PIS
YCIS is definitely an IS.
I think the main reason a school chose to be PIS because of funding reasons. PIS get funds from the government and has to promise to take >70% local residents.
On the other hand, IS are self funding (except ESF), so no such binding condition.
I suggest parents choose schools according to curriculum rather than legal definition.
For instance, DBS is also offering IBDP which is an international curriculum. CKY is also a lot more "international" than YCIS in terms of culture.



Rank: 8Rank: 8


19315
17#
發表於 13-5-7 09:11 |只看該作者
nintendo 發表於 13-5-7 08:44
YCIS is definitely an IS.
I think the main reason a school chose to be PIS because of funding reason ...
VSA is a PIS, but apart from the funds to build the campus, it does not get any recurring funding from the government.

Rank: 7Rank: 7Rank: 7


10361
18#
發表於 13-5-7 09:14 |只看該作者

引用:Quote:nintendo+發表於+13-5-7+08:44+YCIS+

原帖由 poonseelai 於 13-05-07 發表
VSA is a PIS, but apart from the funds to build the campus, it does not get any recurring funding fr ...
Funding for campus what I wanted to say.
And because of the funding, schools have restrictions in taking students.



Rank: 8Rank: 8


19315
19#
發表於 13-5-7 09:25 |只看該作者
nintendo 發表於 13-5-7 09:14
Funding for campus what I wanted to say.
And because of the funding, schools have restrictions in t ...

What about IS getting school campus from the government?  Does this count as funding?

Rank: 7Rank: 7Rank: 7


10361
20#
發表於 13-5-7 09:29 |只看該作者

回覆:VSA or Kcis

What is your view then?
The policy and rules of PIS is clear. May be if you are keen you challenge the government?
I think getting the land and funds to build a campus is different from loaning a vacant building ( if that is what u meant)?



‹ 上一主題|下一主題