- 在線時間
- 21 小時
- 最後登錄
- 17-1-12
- 國民生產力
- 1
- 附加生產力
- 17
- 貢獻生產力
- 0
- 註冊時間
- 07-12-18
- 閱讀權限
- 10
- 帖子
- 24
- 主題
- 2
- 精華
- 0
- 積分
- 42
- UID
- 172171
|
原文章由 frenchfries 於 08-4-21 21:28 發表
Hi Psychologist,
本來好開心有個website 可話俾我地知邊間學校成績好.看後我覺得可信性好低.只要有會員不斷入好成績,間學校自然排得前.會員係唔係個個都俾真實成績呢?網站唔會巧究.看學校既排名根本就很難令人相信 ...
Hi Frenchfires,
u raise a good question that the data provided by the website may not reliable. So I ask u a question. Do u believe the message posted by the website, “Pupil.com.hk 運 用 其 龐 大 的 會 員 資 料 庫,再 結 合 電 腦 數 據 分 析,整 理 成 全 港 中 學 排 名,供 大 家 參 考。”, is true?
For a famous website like Yahoo, I guess there is about 30-40% of Internet users use Yahoo’s e-mail. As the website is definitely less famous than Yahoo, it is reasonable to guess that much less percentage of F5 students are the member of the website. May be less than 10%. So the data must be unreliable!
Due to my job nature, I know some EDB (Education Bureau) people, professors of CUHK’s faculty of education and some secondary school teachers. The data provided by the website is uncommonly accurate. At least 5 schools data are accurate. Try to think about, not many current F5 students are their members and even they are member, they can still tell lies! If u know some basic statistics, this is practically impossible to have 5 accurate data points. That’s why I used the term “uncommonly accurate”. I reckon the most unreliable point is “Pupil.com.hk 運 用 其 龐 大 的 會 員 資 料 庫,再 結 合 電 腦 數 據 分 析,整 理 成 全 港 中 學 排 名,供 大 家 參 考。”! This is kind of cover up. I think the data is being disclosed from some insider.
To most people, they are familiar with those traditional elite schools (傳統名校), say DBS, DGS, King’s, QC, Maryknoll, St Paul Co Ed, St Paul Convert, Heep Yunn, Marymount etc. The name of these schools should dominate the ranking. However, the ranking provided by the website is odd. Some school names are just unfamiliar or not famous. They are known as regional band one schools (地區Band 1學校). In the recent years, in fact some regional band one schools outsmart elite schools academically. Let’s take a most extreme example in the ranking provided by the website, 香港道教聯合會鄧顯紀念中學 (Tang Hin). Some people even may not know this school. If u know some EDB people, they can tell u that Tang Hin is the best school in HK in terms of both public exam results and value-addedness. Don’t believe? Just browse Tang Hin’s Website:
http://www.tanghin.edu.hk/en/public_exam_results
Tang Hin’s credit % and “A” % are outrageous! And even St Paul Co Ed and DGS cannot beat her!
By go through triangulation, the data provided by the website is quite reliable (At least to me). Of course, believe it or not is your own choice. U can treat the website as liar. |
|