有否取 DBS 而放棄 SPCC ? - 小一選校 - 教育王國

登錄 | 註冊

討論區

教育王國: 教育講場; 使用意見

幼兒教育: 幼校討論; 幼教雜談

小學教育: 小一選校; 小學雜談

中學教育: 升中派位; 中學交流; 初中教育

專上教育: 備戰大學; 選科選校

國際教育: 國際學校; 海外留學

知識增值: 課外活動; 教材閱讀; 公開考試; 深造進修

特殊教育: 特殊教育; 資優教育; 自閉寶寶; 智能評估

徵求專區: 二手市場; 誠徵老師; 組班專區; 徵保母車

聯絡管理員

教育王國 › 討論區 › 小一選校 › 有否取 DBS 而放棄 SPCC ?

發新帖

樓主: ABCD5678	go 有否取 DBS 而放棄 SPCC ? [複製鏈接]

Rank: 3 Rank: 3


	190

21^#

發表於 07-12-18 22:27 |只看該作者

For your reference:

聖保羅男女中學是香港傳統名校，創立於1915年（當時名為「聖保羅女書院」）。早期只收女生，1918年成為香港第一間規定學生必須穿著校服的學校，1945年戰後復課，兼收男女學生，是香港首所男女同校學校，麥當勞道中學校舍被評為香港三級歷史建築。2001年向政府申請成為直接資助學校，成為首間直資中學。

著名校友
李澤鉅-長江實業副主席

李澤楷-電訊盈科主席

李國章，GBS，JP-香港教育局局長

李國能-香港終審法院首席法官

劉遵義-香港中文大學校長

潘宗光-香港理工大學校長

蔡克剛-資深大律師

周梁淑怡，GBS，JP-香港旅遊發展局主席，香港立法會議員

李家祥-前香港立法會議員

陳啟泰-電視藝員

陳百強-已故歌手

郭偉亮-歌手

雷頌德-音樂人-歌曲-你真強作者

關正傑-歌手

側田-歌手

林敏驄-填詞人

陳司翰-藝人

莊梅岩-編劇

王者匡-Harry哥哥、著名兒童節目主持

羅尚正-音樂人

吳嵩-馬評人

李汶靜-已故無線新聞主播

羅智峰-前線醫生聯盟主席

原文章由 2bbaba 於 07-12-18 10:40 發表
各位好！我都有你地既煩惱！

我個人認為SPCC教出來的小朋友會較有規矩及低調，而DBS就較自由、創意較高亦較自信。當然兩校學術方面都同樣出色。

所以我相信兩間學校教出來的學生係兩類完全唔一樣嘅人。如果睇遠D去到大學 ...

Rank: 3 Rank: 3


	190

22^#

發表於 07-12-18 22:28 |只看該作者

For your reference:

拔萃男書院（簡稱男拔萃、男拔；英語：Diocesan Boys' School，DBS）是基督教香港聖公會東九龍教區所設辦的一間學校，成立於1869年，設有中學部以及小學部（2004年建成），只錄取男生。香港不少官商名人於此，學生在公開考試中成績優異，在體育、學業及音樂比賽中均成績驕人，故此是一所有名的學校。拔萃男書院創校初期為私校，第二次世界大戰後，接受政府津貼，成為津貼中學。回歸後，香港政府引入直接資助制度，拔萃男書院校董會最後決定，為減少所受的限制，改為接受政府直接資助，於2003年改為直接資助學校。

著名校友
孫中山：中國國父(短暫就讀)(中一至中三)
張奧偉：資深大律師

何志平：前香港民政事務局局長

林子祥：歌手、演員

田北俊：立法會議員，自由黨主席

田北辰：九廣鐵路主席，製衣商人

張宇人：立法會議員本校校董

林建名：商人，麗新集團董事

余錦基：商人，公益金委員

何柱國：商人，星島新聞集團主席

楊啟彥：前九廣鐵路行政總裁

湯顯明：香港海關關長

羅智光：香港環境運輸及工務局常任秘書長 1
梁寶榮：香港特別行政區政府駐北京辦事處主任

許威廉：運動員，曾參加1964年東京奧運會

林慕德：作曲家

許浩明：財經界人士

莫天賜：教師，莫文蔚之父

鍾庭耀：香港大學民意研究部主任

方東昇：香港著名新聞主播

廖忠平：香港著名新聞主播

呂秉權：香港著名新聞主播

李臻：香港著名新聞主播

杜汶澤：演員原名吳卓彰

鄧梓峰：電視節目司儀

李傳韻：小提琴家

張灼祥：現任拔萃男書院校長，作家，電臺節目主持

霍建寧：和記黃埔有限公司董事總經理

范鴻齡：現任香港行政會議成員，強制性公積金計劃管理局主席，中信泰富董事總經理(中六至中七就讀)
伍樂城：香港著名音樂監製，作曲人

劉家傑：香港著名英語教師，前香港無線電視新聞報導員

彭鍵基：香港著名法官，現任香港選舉管理委員會主席

鄭耀宗：香港大學的前任校長

羅旭龢：香港第一位華人官守太平紳士，香港實業家

列顯倫：香港著名法官

羅智光：香港政制及內地事務局常任秘書長何柱國

何柱國：全國政協委員，星島新聞集團有限公司主席

原文章由 2bbaba 於 07-12-18 10:40 發表
各位好！我都有你地既煩惱！

我個人認為SPCC教出來的小朋友會較有規矩及低調，而DBS就較自由、創意較高亦較自信。當然兩校學術方面都同樣出色。

所以我相信兩間學校教出來的學生係兩類完全唔一樣嘅人。如果睇遠D去到大學 ...

Rank: 4


	926

23^#

發表於 07-12-18 23:05 |只看該作者

我想知道呢兩間小學是否有教育資優兒童嘅配套?邊間較為喜歡
取錄資優生?

Rank: 3 Rank: 3


	268

24^#

發表於 07-12-31 11:13 |只看該作者

大家揀好未, dbs or spcc?

Rank: 3 Rank: 3


	118

25^#

發表於 07-12-31 17:25 |只看該作者

lemonred,
SPCC

Rank: 3 Rank: 3


	268

26^#

發表於 07-12-31 21:06 |只看該作者

Glad to hear you have made your decision. 衷心祝福你的小朋友讀得開心, 學有所成.

原文章由 TL128 於 07-12-31 17:25 發表
lemonred,
SPCC

Rank: 5 Rank: 5


	2060

27^#

發表於 08-1-1 13:53 |只看該作者

原文章由 papa_pop 於 07-12-18 12:21 發表
Despite being a Chinese-medium primary school, students at SPCCPS have a strong command in English. They have quite a number of NET teachers in school (perhaps even more than those English-medium pri ...

How many NET in schools? How's their arrangement of English lessons?

Rank: 5 Rank: 5


	4773

28^#

發表於 08-1-1 16:44 |只看該作者

I disagree in one point.

The academic training in SPCC is better than that in DBSPS, in my observation.

原文章由 2bbaba 於 07-12-18 10:40 發表
各位好！我都有你地既煩惱！

我個人認為SPCC教出來的小朋友會較有規矩及低調，而DBS就較自由、創意較高亦較自信。當然兩校學術方面都同樣出色...

Rank: 5 Rank: 5


	2060

29^#

發表於 08-1-1 17:35 |只看該作者

Could u share more on this point? Heard that the syll. of DBSPD is quite advance. And the standard is also high. Really want to have a clear picture of both schools.

原文章由 youma 於 08-1-1 16:44 發表
I disagree in one point.

The academic training in SPCC is better than that in DBSPS, in my observation.

[ 本文章最後由 himmamme 於 08-1-1 17:37 編輯 ]

Rank: 3 Rank: 3


	118

30^#

發表於 08-1-1 23:41 |只看該作者

lemonred,
Million thanks for your blessing!
Hope you can make a best decision and God bless your family in all aspects!

TL128

Rank: 5 Rank: 5


	4773

31^#

發表於 08-1-2 10:59 |只看該作者

Yes, the exam papers of DBSPS are generally quite “advanced” and well structured. But the problems are at the “teaching”.

1.
If you are a DBSPS parent, you will find the boys not learning much knowledge at lessons. Teachers usually teach part of the curriculum but not all and comprehensive.
2.
If a boy is going to have sports or Orchestra competitions etc., the school will demand the boy to suspend classroom lessons and to practise. Sometimes the suspension can last for 1-2 weeks.
3.
Almost all parents send their boys to “supplementary schools” 補習社.
4.
It is a boy school. Classroom discipline is another problem.
5.
In SPCC, these phenomena are less apparent.

However, the general English standard (in particular the listening and speaking skills) of DBSPS boys is excellent because the non-Chinese lessons and most ECA are conducted in English.

Maybe my info is not update enough. Please ask a DBSPS parent.

原文章由 TL128 於 08-1-1 23:41 發表
lemonred,
Million thanks for your blessing!
Hope you can make a best decision and God bless your family in all aspects!

TL128

Rank: 5 Rank: 5


	2060

32^#

發表於 08-1-2 11:49 |只看該作者

原文章由 youma 於 08-1-2 10:59 發表
Yes, the exam papers of DBSPS are generally quite “advanced” and well structured. But the problems are at the “teaching”.

1.
If you are a DBSPS parent, you will find the boys not learning much k ...

thank you for your sharing.
How about SPCC? Really want to know more about their situation. Especially how's the English teaching there.

thx!

Rank: 4


	591

33^#

發表於 08-1-2 12:03 |只看該作者

Same opinions as my friend who is a parent of DBSPD.

原文章由 youma 於 08-1-2 10:59 發表
Yes, the exam papers of DBSPS are generally quite “advanced” and well structured. But the problems are at the “teaching”.

1.
If you are a DBSPS parent, you will find the boys not learning much k ...

Rank: 1


	21

34^#

發表於 08-1-2 20:26 |只看該作者

1. If you are a DBSPS parent, you will find the boys not learning much knowledge at lessons. Teachers usually teach part of the curriculum but not all and comprehensive. It is a common phenonmenon for most primary schools in HK, though some may claim to have all their curricula taught, their teaching are not merely superficial.

2. If a boy is going to have sports or Orchestra competitions etc., the school will demand the boy to suspend classroom lessons and to practise. Sometimes the suspension can last for 1-2 weeks. Participating in sport or orchestra competition is wholly optional, if boys once have made their choice, they are found to be able to manage their time for both study and practice.

3. Almost all parents send their boys to “supplementary schools” 補習社. Amongst all parents I have known, I find none having sending their boys to tutorial classes whereasmy relative's daughter, who is now studying at SPCC, has to attend tutorial class after school.

4. It is a boy school. Classroom discipline is another problem. I agree with this but it is controllable, after all they are all energetic boys

.

5. In SPCC, these phenomena are less apparent. I have no idea.

All the above is my personal view, welcome parents to share theirs

.

Rank: 5 Rank: 5


	2060

35^#

發表於 08-1-4 09:50 |只看該作者

DBSPD: EMI school,but there are only 4-5 native English teachers,many students cannot be taught by NET

SPCC: CMI school,but more native English teachers,all the students have chance to be taught by NET (don't know is it correct)

DBSPD: Teach Chinese in Cantonese, only 2-3 Chinese lessons taught in PTH per week (P1-P6)

SPCC: Teach Chinese in Cantonese(P1-P3),all Chinese lessons in P4-P6 are taught in PTH

Correct me if I'm wrong.

Rank: 3 Rank: 3


	286

36^#

發表於 08-1-4 12:22 |只看該作者

From my observation, students at SPCCPS, though a CMI school, are really good at English and PTH. There are somehow quite a number of NET teachers in school, plus a PTH-teacher/assistant in each class (at least for lower forms).

Don't have much first-hand experience with DBSPD students, but students at DPS (Kowloon Tong), an EMI school, are not really impressive in terms of their spoken English.

PS: I didn't refer to "individual" cases, but general impression.

Rank: 5 Rank: 5


	4773

37^#

發表於 08-1-5 15:46 |只看該作者

I am surprised to receive one defense only.

1.
據DBSPS 家長所講, DBSPS考得深, 教得淺, 所以幾乎全民皆補, 補費平均$300-800一句鐘.
2.
還有, 比賽前老師[勸諭]學生要走堂練習, 學生那敢不從?
3.
你是校長,老師定小一家長?

原文章由 everyma 於 08-1-2 20:26 發表
1. If you are a DBSPS parent, you will find the boys not learning much knowledge at lessons. Teachers usually teach part of the curriculum but not all and comprehensive. It is a common phenonmenon for most primary schools in HK, though some may claim to have all their curricula taught, their teaching are not merely superficial.

2. If a boy is going to have sports or Orchestra competitions etc., the school will demand the boy to suspend classroom lessons and to practise. Sometimes the suspension can last for 1-2 weeks. Participating in sport or orchestra competition is wholly optional, if boys once have made their choice, they are found to be able to manage their time for both study and practice.

3. Almost all parents send their boys to “supplementary schools” 補習社. Amongst all parents I have known, I find none having sending their boys to tutorial classes whereasmy relative's daughter, who is now studying at SPCC, has to attend tutorial class after school.

[ 本文章最後由 youma 於 08-1-5 18:55 編輯 ]

Rank: 5 Rank: 5


	4773

38^#

發表於 08-1-5 15:50 |只看該作者

But most "local" English teachers in DBSPS can speak very fluent English. My impression is that DBSPS students' speaking English is generally better than SPCC's.

原文章由 himmamme 於 08-1-4 09:50 發表
DBSPD: EMI school,but there are only 4-5 native English teachers,many students cannot be taught by NET

SPCC: CMI school,but more native English teachers,all the students have chance to be taught by N ...

[ 本文章最後由 youma 於 08-1-5 18:56 編輯 ]

Rank: 5 Rank: 5


	3300

39^#

發表於 08-1-5 17:49 |只看該作者

原文章由 youma 於 08-1-5 15:50 發表
But most "local" English teachers in DBSPS can speak very fluent English. My impression is DBSPS students' speaking English is generally better than SPCC's.

All local 'English' teachers are supposed to speak fluent English. For those who cannot, what we could say is -- 'too bad'!

Rank: 5 Rank: 5


	2528

40^#

發表於 08-1-5 18:40 |只看該作者

I dont agree with your impression

At least those boys I know studying in DBPSD are not speaking very good English but no doubt they are good in listening as most of teachers are NET.

原文章由 youma 於 08-1-5 15:50 發表
But most "local" English teachers in DBSPS can speak very fluent English. My impression is DBSPS students' speaking English is generally better than SPCC's.

‹ 上一主題|下一主題 ›

發新帖

熱門主題

最高瀏覽主題

Copyright © 2002 - 2024 Baby-Kingdom.com Limited, All Rights Reserved.
有關我們
使用條款
免責聲明
私穩政策
廣告查詢