- 在線時間
- 112 小時
- 最後登錄
- 15-4-7
- 國民生產力
- 49
- 附加生產力
- 455
- 貢獻生產力
- 0
- 註冊時間
- 06-7-27
- 閱讀權限
- 10
- 帖子
- 333
- 主題
- 29
- 精華
- 0
- 積分
- 837
- UID
- 93284
|
I noticed a very adnormal phenomenon of Position in Class vs Position in Form for my son's form. In my son's class, the #3 in class is the #3X (middle part of the 30) in the form. The #7 in class is not even in the Top50 in the form. For my son, his rank in the class is the same as last year but in form is also dropped. Then, I heard from other class, the #8 in class is #2X (very early part of the 20) in the form (for her case, her rank in class is improved by 1, the rank in form is significantly improved. But of course, it may be due to herself hardworking).
I didn't study Statistics but I was 6Sigma black belt before. If we do a hypothesis to test if the 2 classes are the same, I think there is high confidence that the 2 classes are not the same.
So, I have a question if the students were randomly assigned in different classes. I assume it is. If so, why we come out this situation??
- If the teachers of my son's class didn't teach so well relatively so that their academic result dropped relative to other classes? (Personally I don't believe so and I don't want so.)
- If there is big variation in the marking scheme?? (seems this could be the reason)
I hope the school can study this and at least give our parents some explanation on that and if there is some area to be improved. I understand that we should not pay too much attention in the marks and the rank (my son himself doesn't care about that), but at least as a parent, I want the kid to be fairly assessed and we can better understand his progress.
I wonder if I should reflect this to the school? Any suggestion??
|
|