用戶登入
用戶名稱:
密      碼:
搜索
教育王國 討論區 小學雜談 St Joseph VS ST Paul Boys, 高主教, ST Stephen
樓主: Leechi
go

St Joseph VS ST Paul Boys, 高主教, ST Stephen [複製鏈接]

Rank: 7Rank: 7Rank: 7


11241
121#
發表於 07-6-12 13:17 |只看該作者

Re: St Joseph VS ST Paul Boys, 高主教, ST Stephen

我女個補習老師,兩間學校都有補(同時),佢話st joe英文深,全部跟住st joe都無錯架啦......我諗唔係因為佢係英小所以英文好...係本身st joe英文係深........的確既....英小未必英文好..hehe,中小又未必英文差.....個別學校而已啫

p.s. st joe中一二就做會考卷啦....

Rank: 3Rank: 3


169
122#
發表於 07-6-12 13:41 |只看該作者

Re: St Joseph VS ST Paul Boys, 高主教, ST Stephen

麟媽媽 寫道:

1.St. Jo 每年係無5% 留班生,但呢5% 係教局定架嘛,
間間津校都係咁計,無留班生咪留黎叩門位囉,
總之呢5% 唔會放出去派位,你仲係唔明呀?

2.你個仔其實派左位未架?你真係要了解多D 先得,
我眼見好多家長小六選校都仲係檬查查,
以為中學收晒,又以為自己接埋龍添呀,笑死人。

1.You're right"無留班生咪留黎叩門位囉,
總之呢5% 唔會放出去派位"but turn out the 叩門位 go to their own students from  St. Jo Primary ,that's why there are almost 180 students of F1 THIS YEAR are from St.Jo Primary.

2. Thanks for advices of "你個仔其實派左位未架?你真係要了解多D 先得" My son didn't join central allocation.
I just share my past experiences and opinion with other moms here.


1272
123#
發表於 07-6-12 13:48 |只看該作者

Re: St Joseph VS ST Paul Boys, 高主教, ST Stephen

Sindy 寫道:

p.s. st joe中一二就做會考卷啦....


我都聽到一個學生咁講,但做到咁深為乜呢
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Rank: 3Rank: 3


169
124#
發表於 07-6-12 14:02 |只看該作者

Re: St Joseph VS ST Paul Boys, 高主教, ST Stephen

fannycheungmache,

Your words touched someone's "癢處". Though you're not the one who introduce "Wah Yan" here,
I think it's no good to discuss the diff. between St. Jo & Wah Yan. Actually St.Jo wasn't and isn't and wouldn't be my cup of tea, but it's really very good  and famous. I really don't like the ppl always theaten others and discrible St.Jo as a hell and says how good is the school which her son studies in even it's out of the topic.  
該用戶已被刪除

125#
發表於 07-6-12 22:00 |只看該作者

Re: St Joseph VS ST Paul Boys, 高主教, ST Stephen

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽

Rank: 14Rank: 14Rank: 14Rank: 14

王國長老


5044
126#
發表於 07-6-13 10:16 |只看該作者

Re: St Joseph VS ST Paul Boys, 高主教, ST Stephen

我係小學雜談呢度成5 年了,
一向都同大家分享升小同埋選校心得,
自問一向中肯,無踩過或批評過任何學校,
而津校升中派位制亦唔係可以由我亂up 既,
試問我講錯咩?你地兩位又唔係St. Jo 家長,
點解唔信吓教局既公佈呢?講叩門,一定得架?
升中位少,入得咪比心機讀囉,
能者居之,讀書同做工都一樣架啫!
St. Jo 小學位多,入讀率比較高,
但升中位少,競爭大都唔係咩秘密嘛?!
點解要講到我踩低別人抬高自己?
間間津校直屬額都係咁計既,
邊個唔掂都一樣無得留低架!
呢個係現實,入左直屬津校便要努力。
仲有,我一直無話過St. Jo 唔好啫?
只係呢個咁既派位制超低能!
既然你兩位都唔係心儀St. Jo,
那對你兩根本無關痛癢,針唔到肉罷!
只有身在其位,先知當中難處。
只望選St. Jo 既家長衡量孩子既能力,
眼見大多St. Jo 學生都是快樂男孩,
請緊記壓力只來自父母,不是來自校方。

Rank: 14Rank: 14Rank: 14Rank: 14

王國長老


5044
127#
發表於 07-6-13 10:31 |只看該作者

Re: St Joseph VS ST Paul Boys, 高主教, ST Stephen

fannycheungmache,

估唔到以你過往既表現同言行,係BK 呢度都有知音,
你又突然變得如此有禮既?!真替你高興。
你舊年咪話一定入St. Jo 既?
點解而家又改口風?抽唔到嗎?真可惜!
咁你仔仔入左邊間私校吖?點都恭喜你先!
講開攞試卷,上到小學個個都咁做架喇,
不過唔好係試卷都要,只攞用相同既出版社囉,
我唔止有St. Jo 既試卷,St. Paul's、聖心、軒小都有,
都係比亞仔參考,睇吓唔同既試卷,幾好架。


fannycheungmache 寫道:
Dear cfanny,

Thanks very much for your advice. I will take note of your advice. I did not mean, nor did I have the slightest intention, to offend the ppl who is crazy about the school that her son is studying.

She said she borrowed "test papers?" from St Jo. Why did she do that? I find it strange but I am not going to guess why.

I share the same view with you. St Jo is a good school, but is not my cup of tea.




[quote]
cfanny 寫道:
fannycheungmache,

Your words touched someone's "癢處". Though you're not the one who introduce "Wah Yan" here,
I think it's no good to discuss the diff. between St. Jo & Wah Yan. Actually St.Jo wasn't and isn't and wouldn't be my cup of tea, but it's really very good  and famous. I really don't like the ppl always theaten others and discrible St.Jo as a hell and says how good is the school which her son studies in even it's out of the topic.  
[/quote]

Rank: 4


835
128#
發表於 07-6-13 11:17 |只看該作者

Re: St Joseph VS ST Paul Boys, 高主教, ST Stephen

其實做份卷深唔深真係關係唔大
考出黎成績, 做深卷學校未必好過做淺卷學校

Rank: 7Rank: 7Rank: 7


11241
129#
發表於 07-6-13 11:30 |只看該作者

Re: St Joseph VS ST Paul Boys, 高主教, ST Stephen

佢唔係考試果時做份深d既卷,而係平時教學做的,即係佢地學生有咁能力囉.......  補習老師就最知佢地程度啦......本校考幾分&排第幾名,呢個學生同出面學校比又係點......係咪? 不過...係咪自己細路受到呢?就要睇囉.....
FUNG12345 寫道:
其實做份卷深唔深真係關係唔大
考出黎成績, 做深卷學校未必好過做淺卷學校

Rank: 14Rank: 14Rank: 14Rank: 14

王國長老


5044
130#
發表於 07-6-13 11:57 |只看該作者

Re: St Joseph VS ST Paul Boys, 高主教, ST Stephen

呢樣真啊!我見讀得St. Jo 有D 好受得,
當然個人資質好緊要,咁自然唔會太辛苦。

其實出面既地區小學分分鐘仲梗過St. Jo,
只因無直屬,升中要爭餐死,入咩精英班,
學校又迫,因怕派位唔好會影響小一收生,
容咩易收生不足要殺校架?!
深得黎又追不上,家長又無支持仲慘,
咪攪到無晒學習興趣,變晒雙失青年。
所以,入到有直屬中學既小學係辛苦,
但無直屬既可能仲辛苦,總之苦了孩子,
所以大家先咁鐘意接左龍既直資學校,
一直讀上去,小朋友同家長都無咁辛苦囉。
係呢,Sindy 你亞細派位未呀?定係出年?


Sindy 寫道:
佢唔係考試果時做份深d既卷,而係平時教學做的,即係佢地學生有咁能力囉.......  補習老師就最知佢地程度啦......本校考幾分&排第幾名,呢個學生同出面學校比又係點......係咪? 不過...係咪自己細路受到呢?就要睇囉.....

Rank: 7Rank: 7Rank: 7


11241
131#
發表於 07-6-13 12:12 |只看該作者

Re: St Joseph VS ST Paul Boys, 高主教, ST Stephen

總之邊間深,邊間好唔好.....最緊要受啦,唔係入到去都未必好事.....

我阿細細個....佢出年年尾先揀學校....後年先小一,而家仲收緊料...又唔知佢受邊樣......都好煩下

麟媽媽 寫道:
呢樣真啊!我見讀得St. Jo 有D 好受得,
當然個人資質好緊要,咁自然唔會太辛苦。

其實出面既地區小學分分鐘仲梗過St. Jo,
只因無直屬,升中要爭餐死,入咩精英班,
學校又迫,因怕派位唔好會影響小一收生,
容咩易收生不足要殺校架?!
深得黎又追不上,家長又無支持仲慘,
咪攪到無晒學習興趣,變晒雙失青年。
所以,入到有直屬中學既小學係辛苦,
但無直屬既可能仲辛苦,總之苦了孩子,
所以大家先咁鐘意接左龍既直資學校,
一直讀上去,小朋友同家長都無咁辛苦囉。
係呢,Sindy 你亞細派位未呀?定係出年?
該用戶已被刪除

132#
發表於 07-6-13 12:27 |只看該作者

Re: St Joseph VS ST Paul Boys, 高主教, ST Stephen

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽

Rank: 2


62
133#
發表於 07-6-17 15:42 |只看該作者

Re: St Joseph VS ST Paul Boys, 高主教, ST Stephen

Good point!





[quote]

麟媽媽寫道:

“講開攞試卷,上到小學個個都咁做架喇,我唔止有St. Jo 既試卷,St. Paul's、聖心、軒小都有,”

Reply:

“Well, have you got permission from the schools concerned before you obtained a copy of their test papers. It is likely to be an offence of copyright infringement. I don’t encourage that you continue to do so unless you have cleared with the schools concerned. Set a good example to your child, do not copy without obtaining prior permission to do so.”


Rank: 3Rank: 3


217
134#
發表於 07-6-17 15:48 |只看該作者

Re: St Joseph VS ST Paul Boys, 高主教, ST Stephen

I've never heard any court case about somebody copying school exam papers, very interested to know to what extent the law protect the copyright of exam papers.  Please share.  Thanks.

gbcc_mang 寫道:
Good point!





[quote]

麟媽媽寫道:

“講開攞試卷,上到小學個個都咁做架喇,我唔止有St. Jo 既試卷,St. Paul's、聖心、軒小都有,”

Reply:

“Well, have you got permission from the schools concerned before you obtained a copy of their test papers. It is likely to be an offence of copyright infringement. I don’t encourage that you continue to do so unless you have cleared with the schools concerned. Set a good example to your child, do not copy without obtaining prior permission to do so.”


‹ 上一主題|下一主題