用戶登入
用戶名稱:
密      碼:
搜索
教育王國 討論區 小一選校 對直資學校好失望
樓主: fatherfather
go

對直資學校好失望 [複製鏈接]

Rank: 14Rank: 14Rank: 14Rank: 14


113264
61#
發表於 10-12-3 23:43 |只看該作者
原帖由 brian61950 於 10-12-3 18:26 發表
資助學校家長也有交稅的,審計處是一個獨立中肯的政府部門.  


If you read the editorial from SCMP, they critisied AC's audit on DSS schools is not professional enough. I echoed that as how can you audit the DSS by using the govt and subsidised school guidelines. Can you tell me any DSS guidelines at all? I doubt it.

An classic example, how can a new school have old boys or girls in the SMC, as the graduates are minors or even no gradiates yet........ Messy DSS and or Lousy EDB and AC.......

Rank: 4


903
62#
發表於 10-12-3 23:44 |只看該作者
Yes, quite obviously, many who could not manage to get a place in their favoured DSS may tend to blame the whole education system as unfair, the local primary/secondary school allocation mechanism as absurd, the management/teaching staff of the famous school as unreasonable.
If this "DSS scandal" can really put off their inner fire and reduce the bitterness of these parents, let them go!!Let these parents get comforted by riding on the crisis.
Let us keep our minds and hearts clear, and be positive and constructive!!

原帖由 thomasha 於 10-12-3 18:00 發表
Maybe they went through the DSS application process and could not secure a place because of the high thresholds.  I don't know how many attacks are from these parents, but there are certainly some who ...

Rank: 5Rank: 5


1375
63#
發表於 10-12-4 09:29 |只看該作者
[quote]原帖由 puzzledmama 於 10-12-3 23:44 發表
"Let us keep our minds and hearts clear, and be positive and constructive!!"
Can't agree more, not only we parents.  all the teachers, principals, goverment officers should take this "DSS scandal" to review closely what education is about.  Is it really like running a business? Education is concerning the future of a human being, a society, a country and eventually the  world.
Schools are to help their STUDENTS to attain their full potentials so as to fulfill their individual dreams but not to use the STUDENTS to achieve the educators' dreams or missions .  None of  the STUDENTS is expendable or disposable. Goverment officiers should make sure that our education systems and the staff really allow each kid to be duly educated.

Rank: 7Rank: 7Rank: 7


11251
64#
發表於 10-12-4 09:40 |只看該作者
原帖由 brian61950 於 10-12-3 18:37 發表
其實轉晒私校咪好囉,天下太平,學費又係咁交,冇人管,仲唔洗比人"煮荳"添


反對。雖然我有餘錢帮孩子交学費,但我都渴望得到政府的資助。大家都係納稅人,得到政府資助天經地義。

唔通在香港,只能接受大窩飯教育?我又冇話要多啲資助,我只希望得到多點自由,咸鱼青菜也好,大鱼大肉也好,只要自己滿意就得啦。有啲人仲意呢大窩飯,吃飽佢啦,我地喜歡咸鱼青菜或大鱼大肉,又關佢咩事呢?

話是話,大窩飯係唔係更有問題呢?

Rank: 5Rank: 5


1496
65#
發表於 10-12-4 10:02 |只看該作者
的而且確,有些指控是幾攪笑的,但不能憑此而否定所有其他嚴重的指控.

原帖由 ANChan59 於 10-12-3 23:43 發表


If you read the editorial from SCMP, they critisied AC's audit on DSS schools is not professional enough. I echoed that as how can you audit the DSS by using the govt and subsidised school guideline ...
無知是福

Rank: 5Rank: 5


1496
66#
發表於 10-12-4 10:06 |只看該作者
我很尊重亦贊成眼晴雪亮的你們维持你們的看法,這樣只想揀資助的人機會多d.

原帖由 puzzledmama 於 10-12-3 23:44 發表
Yes, quite obviously, many who could not manage to get a place in their favoured DSS may tend to blame the whole education system as unfair, the local primary/secondary school allocation mechanism as  ...
無知是福

Rank: 5Rank: 5


1496
67#
發表於 10-12-4 10:08 |只看該作者
原意是好,但當被一些人濫用的時候,確有檢討的必要.


原帖由 judy 於 10-12-4 09:40 發表


反對。雖然我有餘錢帮孩子交学費,但我都渴望得到政府的資助。大家都係納稅人,得到政府資助天經地義。

唔通在香港,只能接受大窩飯教育?我又冇話要多啲資助,我只希望得到多點自由,咸鱼青菜也好,大鱼大肉也好,只要自己滿意就 ...
無知是福


287
68#
發表於 10-12-7 23:12 |只看該作者
提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽

Rank: 7Rank: 7Rank: 7


11958
69#
發表於 10-12-8 11:56 |只看該作者
原帖由 ghbaby2006 於 10-12-3 23:39 發表


買股票那間無問題喎,唔通真係存入銀行收唔知有無一厘息咩!

最有問題係用校長名買樓那間,相信無咩人會信買幾百萬的野都只會口頭授權無minute

另一間係被人話上堂單打窮學生那一間,到而家都未有解釋 ...

請問上堂單打窮學生的係邊間呀?

Rank: 5Rank: 5


1782
70#
發表於 10-12-8 12:08 |只看該作者
http://hk.apple.nextmedia.com/template/apple/art_main.php?iss_id=20101204&sec_id=4104&subsec_id=12731&art_id=14730523

原帖由 chanwendy 於 10-12-8 11:56 發表

請問上堂單打窮學生的係邊間呀?


287
71#
發表於 10-12-8 22:13 |只看該作者
提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽


287
72#
發表於 10-12-17 23:23 |只看該作者
提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽

Rank: 14Rank: 14Rank: 14Rank: 14

醒目開學勳章 王國長老


58870
73#
發表於 10-12-17 23:46 |只看該作者
聖保羅男女已經係60000一年, 呢樣野應該幾"出名"
其實你對直資學校了解有幾多?
原帖由 fatherfather 於 10-12-17 11:23 PM 發表
最平學費係邊幾間直資學校?
最貴我就知啟思同聖保羅男女來年加到4,800一個月?

Rank: 6Rank: 6


5716
74#
發表於 10-12-18 01:35 |只看該作者
建議你買一本小一入學天書 (星島,明報,蘋果都有出書,仲有其他人寫o既),裡面有學費資料,直資學校唔多,要做功課搵料唔會徙你好多時間。
原帖由 fatherfather 於 10-12-17 23:23 發表
最平學費係邊幾間直資學校?
最貴我就知啟思同聖保羅男女來年加到4,800一個月?

Rank: 5Rank: 5


3364
75#
發表於 10-12-18 09:56 |只看該作者

所以唔好成日話垃圾學生,原來阿蛇重比學生更垃圾,呢間咁既學校,都唔知講乜好,希望唔好咁多呢的咁既老師,唔係的仔女就慘。

Rank: 5Rank: 5


4494
76#
發表於 10-12-18 15:37 |只看該作者
肯定有!之想報過一間係深水步直資, 教育網既學費資料是$1500, 佢果年小一已收$2900, 校長講過有加學費的壓力, 因為通脹喎!不過三年前既通脹都不很利害, E+不知加了幾多, 據讀緊D家長講, 佢地係年年加幾百. 值唔值係另一回事, 但教處係年年批, 此直資小學已第7年, 由開業第一年已加近幾倍.
原帖由 hui916 於 10-12-1 17:14 發表
據我了解, 應該冇一間直資校年年加學費喎, 平均都係3-4年, 甚至5年才加一次. 如果我的資料有誤, 請大家指正
所以, 大家都直資校存有不少誤解.

Rank: 3Rank: 3


316
77#
發表於 10-12-22 00:29 |只看該作者
[quote]原帖由 catcatmom 於 10-12-18 15:37 發表
Hi catcatmom,
可否透露係邊間?
如不方便可PM我....
Thanks!
‹ 上一主題|下一主題
返回列表
發新帖