A-level result - 備戰大學

Rank: 14


	113206

2^#

發表於 10-9-25 19:52 |只看該作者

How many of them through EAS get into universities? They are elites and no need to sit for HKAL.

cman_li

大宅

Rank: 5 Rank: 5


	1586

3^#

發表於 10-9-25 20:09 |只看該作者

If QC school report only counts F.7 graduate, it is the case what 'Jessimm' mentioned. The figure indicates that if the AL students are not top enough, the result is similar whether your are in QC or not.

慧妮會員

大宅

Rank: 5 Rank: 5

醒目開學勳章


	2379

4^#

發表於 10-9-25 21:36 |只看該作者

我諗呢D現象或多或少同拔尖有關聯...

Rank: 14


	113206

5^#

發表於 10-9-26 11:21 |只看該作者

So some ranking just consider AL results and HKCEE results but not mentioned EAS. The ranking is biased.

judy

Rank: 7 Rank: 7 Rank: 7


	11251

6^#

發表於 10-9-27 09:45 |只看該作者

原帖由 ANChan59 於 10-9-26 11:21 發表
So some ranking just consider AL results and HKCEE results but not mentioned EAS. The ranking is biased.

6A拔尖，全港都一樣。我不信參加AL的考生，皇仁的質素会差得過其他学校。

當然，冇講幾多人考，只話XX有幾多A意義唔大。

Rank: 14


	113206

7^#

發表於 10-9-27 10:20 |只看該作者

Refer another post in BK, QC EAS % is the top two in HK, so less elite students go for AL in F7.

An example, A school, F6 100 students, 25 EAS, 75 go for AL and get 25 As; and B school, F6 100 students, 10 EAS, 90 go for AL and get 30 As.

In case, A school total AL - A's less than B school's, 90 stdents' A versus 75 students' A.

If we standardise EAS equivalent to 3 AL-As (just for illustration purpose), so the total As of A school may be more than B school. A school 25*3 = 75 As and B schools 10*3 = 30 As. Total for A school = 25 + 75 = 100 As and B school = 30 + 30 = 60 As.

More meaningful presentation:

F6 student number = 100
EAS student number = 25
F7 student number = 75
Total number of AL As out of 75 students = 25

[ 本帖最後由 ANChan59 於 10-9-27 10:50 編輯 ]

Rank: 14


	113206

8^#

發表於 10-9-27 10:47 |只看該作者

My response

原帖由 judy 於 10-9-27 09:45 發表
6A拔尖，全港都一樣。我不信參加AL的考生，皇仁的質素会差得過其他学校。 (Refer to above post's illustration, more elite students opt for EAS definitely affect their school's A level results, less elite students sit for AL)

當然，冇講幾多人考，只話XX有幾多A意義唔大。(Agreed)


	84

9^#

發表於 10-10-24 16:47 |只看該作者

6A拔尖 was there for 25 yrs (started by CU, to compete with HKU for good students in 1985).
The programme ruined many of my classmates as most of those student join CU with their target faulty downgraded (ie. choose pure science rather than Medicine) in order to get U entry & escape from HKAL. Now they are just ordinary E.O. vs professional Dr (those stay for HKAL for HKU)

Be frank, HKCEE is simple & A is easily to get ( esp if a average student study with brillant classmate). Vs HKAL is more complex/ difficult. HKAL student is more mature.

[ 本帖最後由 Student123 於 10-10-24 16:48 編輯 ]

Rank: 14


	113206

10^#

發表於 10-10-25 23:35 |只看該作者

回覆 9# Student123 的文章

Refer to the data from medicine faculty of CUHK, 1/3 of students come from EAS. So what you mentioned may be outdated, if we are talking about the EAS.

Medicine as example
1/3 EAS
1/3 ALs
1/3 Non-JUPAS

In your last paragraph mentioned about student maturity, you are absolutely right, even those professors highly regard those Non-JUPAS students are graduates (either undergraduates or postgraduates to take up medicine), they are more mature, academically sound and better team work.


	84

11^#

發表於 10-10-26 10:34 |只看該作者

Do you know the data of HKU?
Be frank, post-graduate students with age>23 have less capability in memory during their medical school.

原帖由 ANChan59 於 10-10-25 23:35 發表
Refer to the data from medicine faculty of CUHK, 1/3 of students come from EAS. So what you mentioned may be outdated, if we are talking about the EAS.

Medicine as example
1/3 EAS
1/3 ALs
1/3 Non-JUP ...

cow

http://hkmed.blogspot.com/2009/0 ... pas-admissions.html

Rank: 7 Rank: 7 Rank: 7


	10848

12^#

發表於 10-10-26 16:04 |只看該作者

judy

Rank: 7 Rank: 7 Rank: 7


	11251

13^#

發表於 10-10-27 19:13 |只看該作者

they are more mature, academically sound and better team work.

我聽到嘅就話冇咩特別，最好的一批都是本地生。

我聽到各佔1/3之届面是被迫的:

1. 60個EAS己是收到最盡。港大收8A以上，中大7A以上。
2. AL，中大1A都有收，如果再收，就收到較"差"的了。
3. Non-JUP，正一联合國部隊，應届AL唔收，到外地讀一两年書有之，本地大学生畢業生有之，甚至有Phd学生。

繞地球一圈，冇錯成熟點。但讀書嘅嘢，始終看天份。天份好的，一早入U啦。


	84

14^#

發表於 10-10-28 10:15 |只看該作者

Agree!!!
Be frank, post-graduate students with age>23 have less capability in memory during their medical school.
Medicine need good memory & analytic power.
Most of them have fair academic results (Exam / test 4x ayr) & some failed, repeat 1 yr during medical school , or even quit.

quote]原帖由 judy 於 10-10-27 19:13 發表

我聽到嘅就話冇咩特別，最好的一批都是本地生。

我聽到各佔1/3之届面是被迫的:

1. 60個EAS己是收到最盡。港大收8A以上，中大7A以上。
2. AL，中大1A都有收，如果再收，就收到較"差"的了。
3. Non-JUP，正一联合國部隊，應届AL ... [/quote]

cow

Rank: 7 Rank: 7 Rank: 7


	10848

15^#

發表於 10-10-28 10:45 |只看該作者

原帖由 Student123 於 10-10-26 10:34 發表
Be frank, post-graduate students with age>23 have less capability in memory during their medical school.

If so, why medical education in America and Canada is mostly post-graduate ?

Rank: 14


	113206

16^#

發表於 10-10-28 20:57 |只看該作者

原帖由 cow 於 10-10-28 10:45 發表

If so, why medical education in America and Canada is mostly post-graduate ?

Don't be so serious. He is a student only..... I mean his name....:D


	84

17^#

發表於 10-10-29 10:50 |只看該作者

It was my personal experience.
If you know some Dr or medical students, you will know that it is a very hard subject with infinity information to be memorized.
The HK/ UK system of medical training (age start at 18-19 till 23-24) is much better than the USA training (need undergraduate degree with not much relevant to medical career/ training) (with age ~ 21-22 till 26-27).
Further post-graduate training need 7-10 yrs in HK in order to become a specialist Dr.
Human memory capability start to deteriorate at the age of 27, most obvious at age >30.

[ 本帖最後由 Student123 於 10-10-29 10:53 編輯 ]