皇仁書院

hkmom

Chole 發表於 15-12-16 15:28
我聽返嚟都係咁，average 學校頭三至可能有得 in, 所以唔好浪費自行機會。



  ...

Will "top 3" be an oversimplified guideline?  I've heard that rather it is the "rank order" that determines whether one can be selected for interview.  Is this true?

(I understand that secondary schools including QC will not just shortlist students solely by their "form position", but rather to base on EDB's list of P.6 students arranged in ascending "rank order".  This means that students with form position outside top 3 can still appear relatively high in the "rank order" list for getting an interview.)

hkmom

yee8001 發表於 15-12-16 18:52
如果升返第三我都想搏吓CQ，就怕佢間學校連in都唔得in🙈 聽講舊年同級考第一的同學仔轉咗去喇沙小學 ...

轉咗??  定係先考到另一間，之後再叩到喇小？

hkmom

Band5 發表於 15-12-16 20:03
我見好多人都要睇有冇得全in嚟決定報邊間，其實我覺得根本上係冇分別。試用QC做例子：

QC先以教署排名揀20 ...

The following assessment criteria are quoted from QC's website:

本校將於2016年1月向教育局呈交中一自行分配學位申請者之名單。校方會根據各申請者在學業成績(佔評分50%)、操行(佔評分5%)及課外活動(佔評分15%)三方面的表現，安排約二百名申請者參加面試，面試將考核申請者的中英文語文能力、溝通能力及常識(佔評分30%)。


So the weighting for rank order vs interview performance is 50% vs 30%.  Interviews still play a vital part in the selection process.  Maybe QC doesn't want bookworm type of high achievers but rather all-round students.  In fact, all-round students are welcome everywhere, aren't they?