大學提高門檻 篩走4,000學生

ANChan59

samsam123321 發表於 16-11-17 11:36
Dse 其深度跟以前會考分別不是很大，現在多讀了一年，我覺得入得大學的應該足以應付。 ...

Are you serious ???  
Matriculation or college admission ???

samsam123321

ANChan59 發表於 16-11-17 12:19
Are you serious ???  
Matriculation or college admission ???

差不多，dse core maths =a maths.Phy chem bio cut 曬syllabus.不要高估dse
其實應該學祖國英語不是必考就更加完美。全面回歸祖國懷抱，yeah!

ANChan59

samsam123321 發表於 16-11-17 12:26
差不多，dse core maths =a maths.Phy chem bio cut 曬syllabus.不要高估dse
其實應該學祖國英語不是必考 ...

我都估你玩嘢！

samsam123321

ANChan59 發表於 16-11-17 13:48
我都估你玩嘢！

經過深思熟慮，香港再不跟上大陸接鬼就毫毛假直，祖國國家先進，你們下一代必須學好普通話，頭入祖國14億人的弱肉強食的社會去一起競爭，才不旺今生是強國人的榮耀。

samsam123321

所以我已經決定將來小朋友到大陸實習，多了解國情。真正體驗過，才知道祖國的可愛。

brother4

將來去大陸實習?中医科定建築系或酒店。。。

samsam123321

brother4 發表於 16-11-17 15:58
將來去大陸實習?中医科定建築系或酒店。。。

雖然祖國唔多當我們是自己人，但我希望小朋友做建設祖國的螺絲釘。

brother4

原來本地医科要祖國實習

ANChan59

brother4 發表於 16-11-19 12:55
原來本地医科要祖國實習

可以明白囯情，了解醫霸，醫療暴力，收紅包，見$先救，了解文化差異，會更有國際視野，對拯救生命，更有體會，可能更願意減薪在香港服務香港人。

brother4

减薪自己看街症，再排專科要等一年 ，街症容易寫信，看咗三次街症寫在三次信，最後排期三個月後算快，看等唔等，私家一樣寫信去私家專科，D錢佢地容易賺，病向錢去医，等唔到上去私家專科，俾錢立刻做小手術，即日出院，3個月去政府專科，5分鐘看完話你都好番不用來

nintendo

ANChan59 發表於 16-11-16 13:14
Those 4000 students may not have a space in past years.

I have the same view.
The "minimum entry requirements" has always been a "cut-off" point only. It was never said to be a "guarantee".
Students that barely make it pass the "minimum entry requirements" usually cannot not make it to universities anyway.

ANChan59

nintendo 發表於 16-11-19 14:51
I have the same view.
The "minimum entry requirements" has always been a "cut-off" point only. It  ...

That's my point.

Many parents mixed it up.

penguin_chick

「大學提高門檻，篩走4,000學生」這類標題同甚麼死亡之卷都只是嚇人搶目光的文字，現在5科沒有20分都機會微，即5科平均要4級，33222晨早被篩去，即如區官所說︰「釋不釋法，法庭的結論都一樣！」

cmamum

ANChan59 發表於 16-11-16 14:39
The intakes are from high to low in scores, so no matter 33222 or 332233, that's mathematically poss ...

Of course I understand it’s not possible for those students who only meet the minimum requirements of obtaining 33222 or 332233, to enter universities through Jupas in HK.  I will never mix this up.

However in this article, the 4000 students are calculated as the difference between students who obtained “3322+2 or above” and “3322+33 or above”.  The main difference is the two elective subjects.

For example, Student A who got 5545+42 and Student B who got 5545+33. They both got a place to enter PolyU last year.

But in this coming year, only Student B could possibly get a place from PolyU, and not Student A, as the minimum requirements changed to 332233, which means the two elective subjects got to be both 3 or above.

Student A is ranked among the “33222 or above” group and Student B is ranked among the “332233 or above” group.

Student A could be one of the 4000 students who got a place last year, but not this year.

A "sift" from the change of minimum requirements.

ANChan59

cmamum 發表於 16-11-21 09:41
Of course I understand it’s not possible for those students who only meet the minimum requirements ...

No matter what hypothetically possible from your argument, all spaces are from high to low.  Even 332233, also no chance even no change of min requirement.

Am I correct?

cmamum

ANChan59 發表於 16-11-21 10:00
No matter what hypothetically possible from your argument, all spaces are from high to low.  Even 3 ...

Yes, you are correct that there is no chance to get a space for those meeting only the minimum requirements, no matter 33222 or 332233.  

My concern is someone like Student A who obtained 5545+42, who could get an offer from PolyU in the past years before the change, but not now.  

Some students may "suffer" from this change, even if they are good at the 4 core subjects but failed to get "33" in both of the electives, then they don't have a chance to get into or even apply to either HKU, CU, HKUST, City U or PolyU.

So the change does matter some of the students.

Thanks :)

samsam123321

其實2=以前AL的F。 332233 即係得4科合格，入唔到U非常正常。

王家爸爸

samsam123321 發表於 16-11-17 12:26
差不多，dse core maths =a maths.Phy chem bio cut 曬syllabus.不要高估dse
其實應該學祖國英語不是必考 ...

祖國表面上係英語不是必考，其實係對大部分人來講係必考。原因係外語係高考既必考科，除非你住東北，可能俄語勁啲，但係對大部分人來講，其實英文係最容易既，所以我見我啲上海朋友既仔女，都係考英文作為外語。

Mattison

cmamum 發表於 16-11-21 14:03
Yes, you are correct that there is no chance to get a space for those meeting only the minimum requi ...

The reason behind the change is, I believe, the sufferings and sometimes, the failures from the intakes the university sees in the recent years. Students might be good in cores, yet not at electives since there was only one required that the points for the entrance mainly came from the cores. In fact, ability and knowledge from one elective might not be sufficient to prove they are good to survive in the next four years even that could be as good as the top grade that the university, inevitably, asks for an extra one to make sure the students are capable of what they are facing everyday.
In the past, back to the A level age, universities were so sure that two good electives and good English would do it all, unlike the present Cores which is irrelevant to more than half the courses.

Sometimes, I wonder there is a say always coming from our administration that for those have been successfully proved would maintain only applies to something that they cannot afford to lay their fingers on.

samsam123321

王家爸爸 發表於 16-11-22 10:15
祖國表面上係英語不是必考，其實係對大部分人來講係必考。原因係外語係高考既必考科，除非你住東北，可能 ...

已降低要求不用計高分了。其實夷語不學也可以，祖國有幾多人需要用英語？相信幾年都不用英語的人相信有10億以上。