小朋友愈來愈暴力

shadeslayer

原帖由 IloveJJ 於 16-07-07 發表
你不是幼稚到要「畫公仔畫出腸」到咁既程度吧?！其實我真係無諗過咁高教育程度既人，會連咁簡單既邏輯問題 ...

明的, 差不多先生, 不求甚解, 自己講野不嚴僅, 就係人地幼稚, 這世界很多這些人。

shadeslayer

原帖由 eviepa 於 16-07-09 發表
本帖最後由 eviepa 於 16-7-9 06:34 編輯

幾十年前，已有社會科學家指出，女性並非先天智力不成，她們表 ...

其實我很樂觀, 社会只会進步, 扑扑齋己是過去式, 體罰形老師己比以前大幅減少, 也立例被管制。體罰形家長被控虐兒也常見。體罰形家長在未來只會愈來愈少。

shadeslayer

其實用体罸, 大家認為可以打到幾多歲？樓主孩子長大了, 氣力大了, 擋隔是必然的事。保護自己, 係正常人類 DNA。不是孩子的錯, 是生存本能, 怎能怪他。如果打到18歲還企定定比人打, 我会更担心。

shadeslayer

原帖由 eviepa 於 16-07-10 發表
本帖最後由 eviepa 於 16-7-10 19:05 編輯

I wanted to say this a while back. there is a difference between physically stopping a child when he/she does something dangerous and corporal punishment (using violence to discipline a child.)

shadeslayer

原帖由 simonwan 於 16-07-12 發表
九歲。九歲開始明事理，辨是非。

真樂觀, 九歲明大人的事理嗎？九歲識打电話報警虐兒就有份。

shadeslayer

原帖由 simonwan 於 16-07-12 發表
講過幾多次，我地都反對虐兒。
但系父母打一下手板或屁股都要拉要鎖？我是極端反感的。
你想要這樣的政府 ...

這是法例, 一有傷痕, 刑事也。是德政。

shadeslayer

原帖由 eviepa 於 16-07-12 發表
//size=15.199999809265137px]//1. 完全沒有反叛期。
2. 從來未試過鬧交。
3. 所有分歧都可以在理性討論中 ...

of course they are good things.

shadeslayer

原帖由 simonwan 於 16-07-12 發表
情理法。合法，不一定合情合理。

父母怎樣教仔，政府要管；學校怎樣教書，政府要管；游樂場可不可以跑， ...

時代巨輪不斷向前, 教育只會更好, 社會只會進步, 相信體罸是一種正常教仔手段的人只會愈來愈少。

shadeslayer

原帖由 simonwan 於 16-07-12 發表
情理法。合法，不一定合情合理。

父母怎樣教仔，政府要管；學校怎樣教書，政府要管；游樂場可不可以跑， ...

游樂场不準跑係游樂場管理方的規則, 不是法例。不要混淆。

取自 Wikipedia:

Corporal punishment in the home

Corporal punishment in the home (also calledphysical punishment) refers to an act by aparent or other legal guardian causing deliberate physical pain or discomfort to aminor child in response to some undesired behavior by the child. Corporal punishment of children typically takes the form of spankingor slapping the child with an open hand or striking with an implement such as a belt, slipper, cane, hairbrush or paddle, and can also include shaking, pinching, forced ingestion of substances, or forcing children to stay in uncomfortable positions.

Social acceptance of corporal punishment is high in countries where it remains lawful, particularly among more traditional groups. In many cultures, parents have historically been regarded as having the right, if not the duty, to physically punish misbehaving children in order to teach appropriate conduct. Researchers, on the other hand, point out that corporal punishment typically has the opposite effect, leading to more aggressivebehavior in children and less long-termobedience. Other adverse effects, such asdepression, anxiety, anti-social behavior, and increased risk of physical abuse, have also been linked to the use of corporal punishment by parents. Evidence shows that spanking and other physical punishments, while nominally for the purpose of discipline, are inconsistently applied, often being used when parents are angry or under stress. Severe forms of corporal punishment, including kicking, biting, scalding, and burning, can also constitute unlawful child abuse.

International human-rights and treaty bodies such as the Committee on the Rights of the Child, the Council of Europe, and the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights have advocated an end to all forms of corporal punishment, arguing that it violates children's dignity and right to physical integrity. Many existing laws against battery, assault, and/or child abuse make exceptions for "reasonable" physical punishment by parents, a defence rooted in common law and specificallyEnglish law. During the late 20th and into the 21st century, some countries began removing legal defences for adult guardians' use of corporal punishment, followed by outright bans on the practice. Most of these bans are part of civil law and therefore do not imposecriminal penalties unless a charge of assault and/or battery is justified. Since Sweden's 1979 ban on all corporal punishment of children, an increasing number of countries have enacted similar bans, particularly following international adoption of theConvention on the Rights of the Child. However, domestic corporal punishment of children remains legal in most of the world.

shadeslayer

原帖由 simonwan 於 16-07-12 發表
這就是政府及法例荒謬之處，罰企是體罰，但系做功課最到12 點卻無問題。
...

政府法例要小孩做到12點?