請問版主：為何此處空窗處處？連Eviepa都被釘戶？

csy_ma

自教育政策搬至寬闊的廣場後，我已沒有常到此一遊。今天一看，多了很多有趣題目，豈料見證了一位又一位似乎非常積極理性的會員逐個消失

再去其他版看看，又似乎沒有什麼特別事發生

請問版主：釘戶所為何事？

csy_ma

原來連Judy都被封戶

iantsang

Please refer to this post:

http://forum.edu-kingdom.com/vie ... ;page=3#pid34038605

囝囝爸

版主:

多年來幾位和我最多討論、辯論、爭論的家長相繼消失, 雖然我早兩日前說要淡出 BK, 但現仍覺心痛.  

見證 BK 成長, 不離不棄, 多年出十分力, 時發些光,  間露點火, 瞬間熄滅.   

希望他們早能在 BK 火花再現.

mattsmum

Eviepa也釘戶口？
倒底為什麼?昨天打開這板只見phonic 討論。

1234ats

版主：
有一建议，可否考虑一下。
如发觉会员言论有问题，可否只单独删除该篇文章并予以警告，再犯才封户。
如最后真的决定永久封户，也希望能保留以往没问题的文章。

JoJo

感謝閣下之建議及回覆.

其實 EK 將會系統升級, 屆時功能上會與現時 BK 運作的一樣. 可以有屏敝文章及發警告牌功能, 那便可以將各位會員的發表留在原區作分享. 而違規的會被屏敝及作警告 (嚴重者會封戶以作懲戒)

但系統升級仍有待技術管理員作測試及安排,

現階段 EK 並不能作出以上處理, 因版主需要以人手花大量時間去作分割及刪除違規的回覆. 一切有待升級後, 有關的討論帖會放回.


請耐心等候, 謝謝!

原帖由 1234ats 於 11-10-19 10:20 發表
版主：
有一建议，可否考虑一下。
如发觉会员言论有问题，可否只单独删除该篇文章并予以警告，再犯才封户。
如最后真的决定永久封户，也希望能保留以往没问题的文章。 ...

[ 本帖最後由 JoJo 於 11-10-19 10:31 編輯 ]

vickycheung36

好見意, 有時真的想再看他們的文章.

edea

原帖由 vickycheung36 於 11-10-19 11:26 發表
好見意, 有時真的想再看他們的文章.

要看全文仍可由手機版讀取:

http://m.edu-kingdom.com/

Christi

討論的火花,是難得的.
思想的衝擊,是重要的.
開放的平台,是期待的.

我等...各位復活的一天.

Tommy

Speechless!

So many windows empty, so many people gone, so many familiar names stand lonely next to the empty windows.  So silent in the forum, so sad……………

But, I shouldn’t / wouldn’t / couldn’t shut my month up just because of speechless.  Hope the honorable webmasters allow me to say something.

Now, all parties are at loss.  I think nobody wants to see the current situation.  I agree and support that BK should set some ground rules to keep the discussion forum in good order.  However, I want to give some comments on the rule of “Disrespect” and the ban account policy to manage “Disrespect”.

There are so many stakeholders in the BK forum.  I do agree all stakeholders should be respected and the “Respectful” guideline should be in place to cover them.  However, I think the principal objective of setting “Respectful” guideline is to protect the members participating in the discussion and to ensure the forum in good order.

I’m not saying the webmaster should not be protected by the “Respectful” guideline.  I just think, to protect the webmasters should carry less priority than to protect the members and the forum itself.  After all, webmasters play a monitoring and judging role and they have power to ban accounts.  As such, they should be very careful to exercise their power when the issues are concerning themselves.  

In case some bad guys really say something disrespectful to the webmasters, I do believe other members will make their own judgment and willing to come out to protect the webmasters.  It did happen in the past.  In conclusion, ideally the BK members and the forum should be protected by the rules and guideline while the webmasters should be protected by the BK members.  But now, it seems to be the other way round.  What a pity!

I’ve been hanging around in BK for 9 years.  “Tommy” is my only account in BK.  My identity is transparent to many people in my boys’ schools.  No matter which forum I go and what I say, I always login with “Tommy”.  I treasure it so much.  Hope the honorable webmasters keep my account intact.

Tommy

iantsang

I do not want to see more casualty so please understand the situation before further comments.

http://forum.edu-kingdom.com/vie ... &extra=page%3D1

ANChan59

Let's be patience and allow webmasters to review the relevant thread.

I assume most of our web pals are banned for one day, anyway, we will know more the content of temporary banned posts after their posts and accounts are reactivated.

iantsang

原帖由 ANChan59 於 11-10-19 18:59 發表
Let's be patience and allow webmasters to review the relevant thread.

I assume most of our web pals are banned for one day, anyway, we will know more the content of temporary banned posts after thei ...

Your understanding is very much appreciated.

cow

星島日報 2011-10-19
曾鈺成重申嚴格執行議事規則

曾鈺成表示，相信香港市民期望見到一個更加開放、更具透明度的立法會，他們亦期望見到一個有尊嚴、高質素的立法會，而尊嚴及質素不可能來自議員之間，或者官員與議員之間的互相辱罵。他指語言的力量在於內涵，不在於聲浪，他深信這個會議廳內的所有議員及官員都有能力以文明的語言，充份表達他們的智慧及感情。他表示，雖然本屆立法會只是餘下這個年度，但仍然希望與大家一起努力，使到立法會不單能夠代表廣大市民，表達各種不意見，亦令表達意見的方式，能夠贏得廣大市民的讚賞及尊敬。

Tommy

原帖由 iantsang 於 11-10-19 17:35 發表
I do not want to see more casualty so please understand the situation before further comments.

Ian,

如果能夠與judy和eviepa一起陣亡（Sorry, 韜了您們的光），我倒覺是我的榮耀，不過我知我沒這個資格。

Anyway, 多謝您沒有關閉我的帳戶，並作出了迅速的回應和詳細的交代。我將會慢慢釋懷。

始終覺得多運用預防教育，少進行事後懲罰，大家便可以相親相愛，一團和氣，喜氣洋洋。您應該明白我的意思的。

Tommy

Tommy

原帖由 ANChan59 於 11-10-19 18:59 發表
Let's be patience and allow webmasters to review the relevant thread.

I assume most of our web pals are banned for one day, anyway, we will know more the content of temporary banned posts after thei ...

ANChan,

一個是我的偶像，一個是我的老友；明知多事兼犯險，也不得不拔刀相助。

Tommy

Tommy

原帖由 cow 於 11-10-19 21:51 發表
星島日報 2011-10-19
曾鈺成重申嚴格執行議事規則

曾鈺成表示，相信香港市民期望見到一個更加開放、更具透明度的立法會，他們亦期望見到一個有尊嚴、高質素的立法會，而尊嚴及質素不可能來自議員之間，或者官員與議員之間的 ...

很有意思！突然間對曾鈺成先生有更深刻的了解。

ANChan59

Fully understand and appreciated....