用戶登入
用戶名稱:
密      碼:
搜索
教育王國 討論區 幼校討論 del............................................
樓主: lawhyc
go

del............................................ [複製鏈接]

Rank: 5Rank: 5


2203
21#
發表於 11-3-10 14:51 |只看該作者
原帖由 wootaitai 於 11-3-10 14:46 發表
其實這些都很主觀,排名都是自己估吧。。。
同埋要看看你是"香港人"還是"九龍人"。。我覺得看法都不同。


o甘又係,我住九龍一直覺得HK間間名校而九龍得DGS, Maryknoll同St Mary。

Rank: 5Rank: 5


4355
22#
發表於 11-3-10 14:55 |只看該作者
原帖由 Cutemom0808 於 11-3-10 12:29 發表


所以我咪話HY, YW同bps同一tier, 但點定義tier 1-3大家有不同見解吧!我覺得tier 2係St. Paul Convent / St Paul Co-ed果d呢


唔係掛? (我都忍唔住講左呢句 ) SPCC 系 tier 2?

系我(同埋好多 BK member)心目中, DGS SPCC 應該同 grade。


5462
23#
發表於 11-3-10 15:00 |只看該作者
提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽

Rank: 5Rank: 5


4355
24#
發表於 11-3-10 15:03 |只看該作者
原帖由 Cutemom0808 於 11-3-10 11:53 發表


庇利羅仕及GH好像從來不在Tier 1.  


BPS 系龍頭官校,今年120 周年。

俾我女入到,我一定‘略’飯應呀.

Rank: 5Rank: 5


2203
25#
發表於 11-3-10 15:05 |只看該作者
原帖由 Sumyeema1 於 11-3-10 14:55 發表


唔係掛? (我都忍唔住講左呢句 ) SPCC 系 tier 2?

系我(同埋好多 BK member)心目中, DGS SPCC 應該同 grade。


o甘SPK係咪有不少學生prefer升DGJS??

Rank: 5Rank: 5


2203
26#
發表於 11-3-10 15:07 |只看該作者
原帖由 Sumyeema1 於 11-3-10 15:03 發表


BPS 系龍頭官校,今年120 周年。

俾我女入到,我一定‘略’飯應呀.


任何一間我都‘略’飯應呀

Rank: 5Rank: 5


4355
27#
發表於 11-3-10 15:31 |只看該作者
原帖由 Cutemom0808 於 11-3-10 15:05 發表


o甘SPK係咪有不少學生prefer升DGJS??


一定有人出去考 DGJS / SPCC。

都聽聞去年有一個小朋友考到 DGJS, 但都選擇升讀 SPC。

都系果句, 最主要找間適合小朋友即學校。

[ 本帖最後由 Sumyeema1 於 11-3-10 16:26 編輯 ]

Rank: 5Rank: 5


3973
28#
發表於 11-3-10 16:53 |只看該作者
但我係港島人都覺得呢邊grass greener 喎! BPS 條裙咪綠gum gum 啦.

Rank: 10Rank: 10Rank: 10


25420
29#
發表於 11-3-10 17:46 |只看該作者
I'd rather study at BPS than SPC because much cheaper. BPS is definitely a good school. Ha, but both difficult to enter!

有時我覺得大家有少少鑽牛角尖。就算A校比B校好一些,其實他們學生的成績有好多overlap!
Assume B校的第一名is equivalent to A校的第三十名。
除非你谷到女兒做A校最top嗰30個,否則女兒的overall level不會因為你讀了B校而有輸蝕。
如果B校又近你屋企或學費又平一些,why not let her study at school B??
太苟黎於只是相差不太遠的名氣,只會給自己太大壓力,也容易令那相差不大的名氣影響決定,忽略甚麼才最適合自己的女兒和自己的家庭。
在其thread看見有些家長有幾個很好的offer,名氣學術都很出色,煩惱揀一間最好的。她們都是很好的媽媽。但其實那些學校相差不太大。我覺得最要緊都是how the parents teach the children. Even the most elite school would have students with poor performance.
I would rather become the top or average student of school B, then the worse student of school A.

Rank: 5Rank: 5


1216
30#
發表於 11-3-10 18:18 |只看該作者
本帖最後由 lawhyc 於 16-1-1 19:23 編輯
原帖由 w_y 於 11-3-10 11:33 發表
係囉..我都同你同期. 但GH 應該從未Tier 1 過喎. 反而 St Paul Convent 雖然唔係頂尖成績, 但果陣貴氣真係幾迫人下.

個人意見三間若不計地區, 點睇都係SPK! 同埋你都唔使太在意幼稚園, 講到升中, 若不是一條龍/直屬 ...

[ 本帖最後由 lawhyc 於 11-3-10 18:21 編輯 ]

Rank: 11Rank: 11Rank: 11Rank: 11

醒目開學勳章


46443
31#
發表於 11-3-10 18:53 |只看該作者
support!

原帖由 siden 於 11-3-10 17:46 發表
I'd rather study at BPS than SPC because much cheaper. BPS is definitely a good school. Ha, but both difficult to enter!

有時我覺得大家有少少鑽牛角尖。就算A校比B校好一些,其實他們學生的成績有好多overlap!
Assume B校的第一名is equivalent to A校的第三十名。
除非你谷到女兒做A校最top嗰30個,否則女兒的overall level不會因為你讀了B校而有輸蝕。
如果B校又近你屋企或學費又平一些,why not let her study at school B??
太苟黎於只是相差不太遠的名氣,只會給自己太大壓力,也容易令那相差不大的名氣影響決定,忽略甚麼才最適合自己的女兒和自己的家庭。
在其thread看見有些家長有幾個很好的offer,名氣學術都很出色,煩惱揀一間最好的。她們都是很好的媽媽。但其實那些學校相差不太大。我覺得最要緊都是how the parents teach the children. Even the most elite school would have students with poor performance.
I would rather become the top or average student of school B, then the worse student of school A.

Rank: 5Rank: 5


3363
32#
發表於 11-3-11 11:08 |只看該作者
so happy too see that....

BPS is my alma mater! http://forum.edu-kingdom.com/images/smilies/default/bb34.gif

When i was in secondary school, i have never felt that DGS/St. Paul are superior or better than us in academics but surely our school is not a high profile one.  We don't have 9As/10As as we only took 8 subjects in HKCEE and we don't have very very famous alumli but most of us are doctors/accountants/lawyers or other professional and quite a number of us works at ibank.  

My impression on DGS is that they like to recruit interschool competition award winner to join their school (my cousin won inter-school table tennis award and DGS teacher immediately approached her and asked if she was interested to study there).  
However, the education system has changed and seems that DGS has taken more and more top students and is becoming more and more 'superior'....

原帖由 Sumyeema1 於 11-3-10 15:03 發表


BPS 系龍頭官校,今年120 周年。

俾我女入到,我一定‘略’飯應呀.

Rank: 5Rank: 5


1378
33#
發表於 11-3-11 11:39 |只看該作者
Yes, BPS has been an excellent school for many many years..... back to my old days.....only top students will be admitted.  I just feel a bit worry that under the current 'smart' govt officials' management, govt schools will become less attractive....sigh.....


原帖由 熊貓BB 於 11-3-11 11:08 發表
so happy too see that....

BPS is my alma mater!

When i was in secondary school, i have never felt that DGS/St. Paul are superior or bette ...

Rank: 11Rank: 11Rank: 11Rank: 11

醒目開學勳章


46443
34#
發表於 11-3-11 11:56 |只看該作者
The issue as reflected by recently graduated BPS girls are the change from 5 bands to 3 bands.  Although it is quite clear that they have all the band 1 girls, however, even so, the top band 1 and bottom band 1 girls have great differences already.  And due to the allocation method, it is all by chance.


原帖由 KK07 於 11-3-11 11:39 發表
Yes, BPS has been an excellent school for many many years..... back to my old days.....only top students will be admitted.  I just feel a bit worry that under the current 'smart' govt officials' manag ...

Rank: 4


799
35#
發表於 11-3-22 23:42 |只看該作者
Talking about the old system. As far as I know, all subsidised schools need to have "enough" F4 students, if not, they have to take in F.3 students from other schools (so usually it is the ones with poor academic results). Correct me if I'm wrong!

GHS has 6 classes of F.1-5 even back to the old days, it never "kicks out" any "low achievers" after F.3. Moreover, since many students went overseas (for study and migration) , it did not have enough F4 students (information from past student) and that's why they had to accept students from other school to fill up the "quota".

If my understanding about the F4 allocation system is correct, whether a school needed to take in outsiders in F.4 or not couldnt really tell it was band 1/ 2 that time. Of course, you can say it did take in a few non-band one students in F4 due to the "system" set.

Regarding to the situation you mentioned, one needs to look at the class structure of the school as well. (i.e. if a school had the same no. of classes through out F.1-5 or not) Guess it is the system that created the results you mentioned to some Band 1 schools.

Anyway, there's no such kind of allocation system now :)

原帖由 小曳人 於 11-3-10 11:55 發表


同意~
GH從來唔係tier 1, 不過近年小學好多人都爭住入!

嗰個年代,升中四要睇往年中3試成績,GH F.4係要收外來生架!即刻自己嗰d成績唔夠好,要去差d嘅學校,收其他band 1唔要嘅學生  (即5 banding計,GH唔係 band 1 school!)
...

[ 本帖最後由 twinsstar1 於 11-3-23 11:19 編輯 ]

Rank: 4


836
36#
發表於 11-3-23 00:49 |只看該作者
忍不住要搭嘴。我係港島人,90年代讀中學;妹妹千禧年代讀中學。BPS從來都係我們呢邊的tier one 。

樓主話女兒2011入k1,咁請問係咪有晒談及的kg offer?

Rank: 4


799
37#
發表於 11-3-23 09:44 |只看該作者
yes yes .. v good public exam results records!!!

原帖由 peachcreamy 於 11-3-23 00:49 發表
忍不住要搭嘴。我係港島人,90年代讀中學;妹妹千禧年代讀中學。BPS從來都係我們呢邊的tier one 。

樓主話女兒2011入k1,咁請問係咪有晒談及的kg offer? ...

Rank: 5Rank: 5


1216
38#
發表於 11-3-23 17:58 |只看該作者
本帖最後由 lawhyc 於 15-8-15 00:22 編輯

..........................................................
‹ 上一主題|下一主題