幼童日讀兩校，猶如「虐待」!!

GAT

I believe this phenomeon only appears in Hong Kong.

Parents have to think:

1. when going to apply P1, will you report two KGs? (I don't think so)

2. when the interviewer ask the kid question on school life, which KG you attended - these type of basic questions - how would the kid reply? Or you ask the kid to tell lie to be in line with the KG you reported?

3. I understand some people go for KG because one is better than the other for applying certain types of KGs. So the kid has to remember which KG you reported in this primary school application and tell lies accordingly in different school interviews?

4. I saw some kids eating their lunch downstairs on the public area of my building. They are eating in public area for a short time without any table. I am so unhappy to see the child like that.

5. The maid carries two different KG school bags - so I can confirm the kid go to different KG. Then the teachers will also notice when they see the maid with two school bags every day. I don't think the teacher would like this.

There are other means to get the kid equipped with better foundation but this is certainly not a good way. You also have to think how the kid will think of this & the mom when he grow up?

buddaau

原帖由 airwaves88 於 11-1-26 12:16 發表
我覺得這樣做很好, 很快可以培養出另一個愛因斯坦和牛頓。

我諗都有o的困難, 因為個小朋友都無時間可以坐係蘋果樹下面.:;pppp:

[ 本帖最後由 buddaau 於 11-1-26 13:27 編輯 ]

buddaau

原帖由 GAT 於 11-1-26 13:18 發表
I believe this phenomeon only appears in Hong Kong.

Parents have to think:

1. when going to apply P1, will you report two KGs? (I don't think so)

2. when the interviewer ask the kid question on sc ...

重有呀! 要大庭廣眾, 換衫換褲呀! 真係要叫佢地o的父母試下先.   稚子何辜.

fefemom

I know someone whose daughter attends an international kindergarten in the morning and a local one in the afternoon. They have a driver and the girl eats lunch and gets changed in the van in between.
My impression was: 嘩,日日做明星登台趕下場?好壞胃啫!
Her reason was they could choose going to international school or local school for P1.....

cccbaby

嘩咁會唔會影響發育架，瘦猛猛，讀到識飛都補唔返啦。

LittlePanda101

原帖由 tsobaba 於 11-1-26 11:17 發表
都唔排除有d家長自己打兩份工都OK, 才安排小朋友讀兩間學校, 我深信, "己所不欲, 勿施于人"。

如果二份都係半日3個鐘, 返兩份我ok的

其實個個小朋友都唔同, 讀的學校又唔同, 好難一刀切話一定是對或一定是錯,

cccbaby

我唸睇下個小朋友啦,我個就一定唔得。充足慨睡眠同飲食對小朋友都好重要架。我覺得d家長唔埋三七二十一咁要小朋友讀兩間學校都幾lazy 因為佢哋冇乜了解過咁做係咪真係對小朋友發展有幫助，好多時兩校課程都會duplicate 咁點學得好. 我覺得家長應該花下時間tailor d 適合嘅課程instead of 夾硬要佢哋返兩間咁辛苦小朋友。

[ 本帖最後由 cccbaby 於 11-1-26 20:05 編輯 ]

MelissaBunny

children go to 2 kinder, it doesn't mean that they'll more clever that the others, i do think playing at school, is better than playing at home only ! I sent them to 2 kinder because i feel they feel more happier !  
U are not the fish, how can U know the fish is happy!
My elder daughter begged me not to force her to take a afternoon nap anymore because everytime she'd took a nap she couldn't fall into sleep until 12 midnite !

MelissaBunny

my girls change uniform at home & have lunch at home too.  Most of the time they can play half an hour before going out ! For those eating at the park, at car....., yeah it's quite ....

ho_yan2406

原帖由 Siupak222 於 11-1-26 10:31 發表
讀兩間幼稚園係啲有錢人玩意，大人辛苦就自己攞嚟，小朋友真慘，無得反抗

又唔一定好有錢既,有d冇學卷既kg都係2千幾一個月,咁有學卷既只係幾百....俾3千幾都已經可以讀2間kg,可能仲平過出去學野添~
只係我都係覺得太辛苦la~我諗住個仔讀上午,下午去遊樂場玩架咋....幾歲既小朋友應該開開心心,到讀小一開始,想抖下都難喇~~

國家

點解你地講到好似返半日學咁得閒呢? 我個女返下午PN，但日日都上午及放學後都好忙，好多野做，根本冇時間返多一間學校。

ho_yan2406

原帖由 國家 於 11-1-26 21:36 發表
點解你地講到好似返半日學咁得閒呢? 我個女返下午PN，但日日都上午及放學後都好忙，好多野做，根本冇時間返多一間學校。

係囉,咁返2間咪好多功課?

busy_penny

今天頭條日報專欄----笑容由家開始27/1

道出了中產階層為何讓子女讀兩間幼稚園的心聲：

學券這根刺

近日傳媒報道，部份家長為怕蝕底，安排子女上午入讀注重英語但沒有資助的幼稚園，下午則到另一所有學券資助的幼稚園上課。其實這現象兩年前已發生了，情況是否愈來愈普及，則不得而知。

兩年前某日到校巴站接兒子放學，有另一位同學和他同站下車，但這名同學沒有隨即回家，而是跟隨菲傭到車站後面的公園吃飯盒。我正奇怪為何他們不到快餐店之際，已見菲傭從背包中拿出另一件幼稚園校服，替少主人除褲覑衫。少主人胡亂地吃了幾口飯，便立即變身，跟隨工人到車站對面的幼稚園上課去了。上午班十二時下課，下午班一時打鐘，一小時內，搭校車、吃午餐、換校服，效率奇高。但見小朋友垂頭喪氣、沒精打采的樣子，返學像返工，實在令人心痛。

學券制原意是減輕家長負擔，卻限制了家長的選擇，因並非所有幼稚園都納入資助範圍。對於中產父母來說，學券是一根刺。中產父母十分重視子女教育，不會因學券而放棄他們心儀的優質學校，但他們勞氣為何總是享受不到政府的福利，為有出此「下策」。若學券是一種福利，為何享受福利的人毋須資產審查呢？若有審查，中產會氣順些，因為資助窮人嘛，你不是窮人便不應受資助，合情合理。

話說回來，若政府真的有心資助幼兒教育，何不將之正規化和全面化？十五年免費教育，對於富裕的特區政府來說並非難事，也能顯示政府對基礎教育的重視和承擔。

        張笑容

busy_penny

學券制原意是減輕家長負擔，卻限制了家長的選擇，因並非所有幼稚園都納入資助範圍。對於中產父母來說，學券是一根刺。中產父母十分重視子女教育，不會因學券而放棄他們心儀的優質學校，但他們勞氣為何總是享受不到政府的福利，為有出此「下策」。

非常同意，道出了我的心聲！！

cccbaby

同意這是有些人怕吃虧的心理，但是辛苦小朋友實在太不智。我覺得一個幾歲小朋友點會鐘意返足六至八個鐘頭學呀，唔好玩啦。

easybring

回: 張笑容
如果經濟許可, 不要看交學費多少, 只選心儀一間學校好了. 經濟不許可, 將就一下, 找一間有學卷的好kg.  

15年免費教育, 只是把幾百蚊學費也省回, 而且沒有規定必要上kg的.  問題係教局要求參加學卷的kg和官津小學跟足指引, reports很多, 沒有讓學校靈活運用資源.  15年免費教育也會有私校, 也會出現返兩間學校的問題. 幸好小學是返全日的, 否則, 會有返兩間學校的情形出現嗎? 說笑吧!

原帖由 busy_penny 於 11-1-27 08:22 發表
話說回來，若政府真的有心資助幼兒教育，何不將之正規化和全面化？十五年免費教育，對於富裕的特區政府來說並非難事，也能顯示政府對基礎教育的重視和承擔。

        張笑容

[ 本帖最後由 easybring 於 11-1-27 10:46 編輯 ]

Siupak222

認同，父母為啖氣而辛苦小朋友，等同一對男女因一時開心攪大咗個肚，最可憐係個小朋友。

國家

小朋友每天胡亂地吃了幾口飯，便立即變身，一小時內，搭校車、吃午餐、換校服!!! 大人都唔可以啦, 何況小朋友??!! 唔好講

國家

小朋友每天胡亂地吃了幾口飯，便立即變身，一小時內，搭校車、吃午餐、換校服!!! 大人都唔可以啦, 何況小朋友??!! 唔好講精神疲倦、學習沒有興趣等事情，這樣的生活習慣長久以來，小朋友一定會胃痛，影響健康!!