- 在線時間
- 258 小時
- 最後登錄
- 23-9-30
- 國民生產力
- 4
- 附加生產力
- 2004
- 貢獻生產力
- 0
- 註冊時間
- 10-11-5
- 閱讀權限
- 10
- 帖子
- 822
- 主題
- 21
- 精華
- 0
- 積分
- 2830
- UID
- 676014
|
Now 2 views are before us:
One view represented by Lawsonmoon is that the scrutiny of applicant's address at interivew stage is an abnoxious practice, discriminatory, and probably contrary to the very concept of a Christian education, which is one of the foundations of DGJS.
Another view represented by LesMis99 is that the scrutiny of applicant's address is a standard practice among government primary schools for determining "catchment areas" and that, whilst DGJS is not a government school and hence any concept of catchment areas is irrelevant, its staff did not understand the meaning of "catchment areas" and the different circumstances of a private school and hence they have unnecessarily wasted their time at interview stage in religiously following the irrelevant standard practice of "address checking" without intending to use the applicant's address as one of the factors in P1 admission selection. According to this view, the fact that there are more P1 students from Repulse Bay area and not so many from Junk Bay area is purely incidential and random. |
|