- 在線時間
- 63 小時
- 最後登錄
- 18-4-9
- 國民生產力
- 60
- 附加生產力
- 78
- 貢獻生產力
- 0
- 註冊時間
- 04-12-7
- 閱讀權限
- 10
- 帖子
- 488
- 主題
- 46
- 精華
- 0
- 積分
- 626
- UID
- 36282
|
I don't see what's the problem with DGJS' interview.
QUALITY not quantity. Just because the interview goes on for 1.5 hours, or so... doesn't mean they make better judgements.
I think Mrs. Dai knows what kind of girls she likes for the school. Afterall, she's been pretty good in the past years since she's become the principal. The results, and grades of the students of DGJS haven't dropped.
In fact, that is what the application form, report card, portfolio is for. The PRE-SCREEN the applicants. The interview is to "confirm" what she thinks, and might consider. That's why it's essential that we present the best in the 15 minutes that we get/our daughter gets.
We had the interview already, I did get the sense, the way parents dress, and the girl dressed and manners, and etiquette definitely mattered.
We were grouped with a bunch of others, many many came unprepared in my opinion.... wearing jeans, carrying big knapsacks, ringing mobiles, wearing slipper like sandals, the girls some had messy hair, didn't smile, with our pair.... the other pair of parents didn't even bother getting up to greet and say hi to Mrs. Dai.
If DGJS is your target school like me, you wouldn't care HOW they pick their students, you just do your best and go with the flow. I don't care how they do it, I just hope my daughter gets picked.... it's not like my daughter was singled out by Mrs. Dai with some special test or something? while others had something else... if EVERYONE gets the same treatment during this process... don't see how anyone says it's UNFAIR.
原帖由 philosopher 於 08-10-16 22:19 發表
Take the example of a school which goes through a one-hour interview process with students grouped in different groups:- by definition the different groups are met by different teachers, some perhaps ... |
|