用戶登入
用戶名稱:
密      碼:
搜索
教育王國 討論區 小學雜談 為何用現行方法派小一學位???有興趣入來發表一下 ...
查看: 3585|回覆: 55
go

為何用現行方法派小一學位???有興趣入來發表一下 [複製鏈接]

Rank: 3Rank: 3


244
1#
發表於 05-9-25 18:17 |只看該作者

為何用現行方法派小一學位???有興趣入來發表一下

各位bk 家長

明天交小一自行分配學位表.
對我地只有15分或有D 有20分只是例行入一張表, 以表誠意希望日後統一派派吳到叩門用.     
現本人身同感受為何每年六月份家長派位結果出來後. 無論好與不好家長的反應都好大.    
為何用現行方法派小一學位???   
概然日後可以叩門, 為何要統一派? :tongue:  
為何政府吳再絕一點不可以轉校啦.
又或者私校收了便一定不能Join Luck draw 等我地D家長煩小D.
橫豎香港教育都系2年一小變, 3年一大變. (即系年年都變) 不如就由3歲教育開始改. 或者就由幼稚園便開始計分啦.  
由收到表到現在都未填到校名.    
好的學校又怕多人選擇自已吳夠Luck , 中等又覺得都系By Luck 為何要選次一級.

難怪人是叫凡人.....(真系"煩"人)

祝各位06年入小一都可以如願入理想學校. 當然包括小女
      

Josephine
希望我的孩子茁壯成長

Rank: 3Rank: 3


284
2#
發表於 05-9-25 18:21 |只看該作者

Re: 為何用現行方法派小一學位???有興趣入來發表一下

介紹你看首頁的討論題目: "聯署要求取消宗教分" , 你會很有共鳴!

Rank: 3Rank: 3


244
3#
發表於 05-9-25 18:45 |只看該作者

Re: 為何用現行方法派小一學位???有興趣入來發表一下

0606 寫道:
介紹你看首頁的討論題目: "聯署要求取消宗教分" , 你會很有共鳴!


己看, 謝.
心情好了一點因為大家都系覺得有不同問題.
同意聯名去教統局要求提早放榜

Josephine
希望我的孩子茁壯成長

Rank: 5Rank: 5


1812
4#
發表於 05-9-25 22:59 |只看該作者

Re: 為何用現行方法派小一學位???有興趣入來發表一下

好同意, 不要玩足d家長成年, 瞓唔安食唔落咁.

Rank: 5Rank: 5


1181
5#
發表於 05-9-25 23:49 |只看該作者

Re: 為何用現行方法派小一學位???有興趣入來發表一下

同意! 電腦計分/抽籤, 使唔使用成年時間呀???   

簡直拖~~~長d o野o黎做!   

Rank: 5Rank: 5


1812
6#
發表於 05-9-25 23:59 |只看該作者

Re: 為何用現行方法派小一學位???有興趣入來發表一下

係lor, 早d放榜, 叩門都可以多d時間嘛, 最好好似中學咁設立一個聯招中心, 集中一次過interview幾間, 有位就即收即登記, 唔使又番屋企等電話等信.  唉! 真係白頭髮都出多幾條, 到底政府明唔明, 知唔知家長嘅苦況, 年年都係咁無咩改進, 政府係唔係以玩弄家長為樂嘅呢.

Rank: 3Rank: 3


244
7#
發表於 05-9-26 01:09 |只看該作者

Re: 為何用現行方法派小一學位???有興趣入來發表一下

WChan 寫道:
係lor, 早d放榜, 叩門都可以多d時間嘛, 最好好似中學咁設立一個聯招中心, 集中一次過interview幾間, 有位就即收即登記, 唔使又番屋企等電話等信.  唉! 真係白頭髮都出多幾條, 到底政府明唔明, 知唔知家長嘅苦況, 年年都係咁無咩改進, 政府係唔係以玩弄家長為樂嘅呢.


   聯招中心好主意

Josephine
希望我的孩子茁壯成長

Rank: 5Rank: 5


1249
8#
發表於 05-9-26 02:08 |只看該作者

Re: 為何用現行方法派小一學位???有興趣入來發表一下

明天去入form,我只有15分,陪太子讀書.

Rank: 14Rank: 14Rank: 14Rank: 14

醒目開學勳章 王國長老


58839
9#
發表於 05-9-26 10:41 |只看該作者

Re: 為何用現行方法派小一學位???有興趣入來發表一下

我都覺得好無癮
(可能我又係果種15分"怨婦", 無辦法, 唔呻唔安樂..... )
有d津小, 第一round已經要交portfolio, 又話有interview, 雖然唔可以出offer, 但有咩implication, 大家心照啦, 佢地都好揚架, 點解教署俾佢地年年咁做?
大家都知計分=攪關係, 叩門又=攪關係, 呢度係香港, 唔係大陸, 點解要setup埋d咁唔公平既制度(仲要係近年setup既新制度wor)
我同老公解釋政府小一派位方法, 佢都無法相信(二公婆都唔知嘈左幾多次), 佢問"咁即係就算唔讀幼稚園, 都無所謂啦!" 真係"家門不幸", 呢個就係我地偉大政府深思熟慮, 改完又改之後既構想

Rank: 3Rank: 3


305
10#
發表於 05-9-26 12:25 |只看該作者

Re: 為何用現行方法派小一學位???有興趣入來發表一下

josephine1818 寫道:
[quote]
0606 寫道:
介紹你看首頁的討論題目: "聯署要求取消宗教分" , 你會很有共鳴!


己看, 謝.
心情好了一點因為大家都系覺得有不同問題.
同意聯名去教統局要求提早放榜

Josephine
[/quote]

我不贊成統一派位, 我話應該在第一輪時, 該校是收160人
咪一次過收齊它啦(可以計分制度, 其餘的咪看小朋友的表現), 為何先收一半80人, 等8個月後,又等統一又收80人?
總知就是折磨緊家長.
反正次次統一派位後,  電腦很多時都是錯配, 大部份人都會去心儀的小學到扣門,  為何要入一間自己心儀的小學要咁辛
苦, 但結果又唔係實成功.
但如果是公開考試入學, 反而我贊成, 如果個小朋友是未到該
校的水平, 就算真是派到比你入到又如何?
所以我話教統局成日話統一派位是最公平喎, 本人是絶對不認同.

Rank: 5Rank: 5


2713
11#
發表於 05-9-26 12:40 |只看該作者

Re: 為何用現行方法派小一學位???有興趣入來發表一下

我認為應該取消所有計分制度,除個人意願選擇全港任何一間小學,而且一次過搞掂.
學位中要保留某一百分率給派往他區的小朋友作後備之用,即使太遠,都可回本區就讀.而且由聯招中心辦理.

Rank: 3Rank: 3


149
12#
發表於 05-9-26 13:17 |只看該作者

Re: 為何用現行方法派小一學位???有興趣入來發表一下

I attended a talk by the EMB a while ago on this P 1 application procedure and I did ask them 1) why it takes them so long to announce the Round 2 results, and 2) whether they are aware of the mental stress they have imposed on the parents and how little time they have left the parents to source places in other schools if the results turn out to be undesirable.

The EMB person replied saying that 1) that's the shortest time their computer needs, and 2) rather than to be displeased about the results, parents should accept the schools allocated and help the child settle in (?!?!?!)

As for 1) - Unless their computer was manufactured back in the 1970s, what other computer will need 5 + months to run such a programe? If university can go gene gnome/DNA modules within months (and one is talking about millions and billions of possibilities) and even banks can allocate IPO shares within days (and there are much more IPO applications than P 1 applications per year), what's wrong with the EMB.

I have since come to the conclusion that if the EMB announce the Round 2 results too soon, they will be hard pressed to justify their existence for the for the rest of the year.  If they delay the results till June, then at least they will appear to be gainfully employed until June, by which time, it's just about time to work towards the following year's application....!

2) Their replies to 2 was a load of sh**. I bet they will think and behave differently if it were their child in the lottery game....

        

Rank: 5Rank: 5


2713
13#
發表於 05-9-26 13:25 |只看該作者

Re: 為何用現行方法派小一學位???有興趣入來發表一下

唔係呱,要5個月時間,真係好難令人相信喎!
人手都唔洗5個月啦!
咩 system 嚟架!
希望我唔洗受佢折騰啦! 1st round 搞掂就唔理得佢啦!

Rank: 4


744
14#
發表於 05-9-26 13:54 |只看該作者

Re: 為何用現行方法派小一學位???有興趣入來發表一下

他 們 (教 統 局) 是 做 官, 不 都 是 做 事

Mrssslui 寫道:
唔係呱,要5個月時間,真係好難令人相信喎!
人手都唔洗5個月啦!
咩 system 嚟架!
希望我唔洗受佢折騰啦! 1st round 搞掂就唔理得佢啦!

Rank: 3Rank: 3


284
15#
發表於 05-9-26 15:58 |只看該作者

Re: 為何用現行方法派小一學位???有興趣入來發表一下

有無攪錯!!!!!!!

唔通班高官享有高薪厚職, 就只是識答D "灑" 人的答案??????
Chatterbox 寫道:
I attended a talk by the EMB a while ago on this P 1 application procedure and I did ask them 1) why it takes them so long to announce the Round 2 results, and 2) whether they are aware of the mental stress they have imposed on the parents and how little time they have left the parents to source places in other schools if the results turn out to be undesirable.

The EMB person replied saying that 1) that's the shortest time their computer needs, and 2) rather than to be displeased about the results, parents should accept the schools allocated and help the child settle in (?!?!?!)

As for 1) - Unless their computer was manufactured back in the 1970s, what other computer will need 5 + months to run such a programe? If university can go gene gnome/DNA modules within months (and one is talking about millions and billions of possibilities) and even banks can allocate IPO shares within days (and there are much more IPO applications than P 1 applications per year), what's wrong with the EMB.

I have since come to the conclusion that if the EMB announce the Round 2 results too soon, they will be hard pressed to justify their existence for the for the rest of the year.  If they delay the results till June, then at least they will appear to be gainfully employed until June, by which time, it's just about time to work towards the following year's application....!

2) Their replies to 2 was a load of sh**. I bet they will think and behave differently if it were their child in the lottery game....

        

Rank: 5Rank: 5


3883
16#
發表於 05-9-26 17:01 |只看該作者

Re: 為何用現行方法派小一學位???有興趣入來發表一下

Agree !

幾時簽名呀, 預埋我, 咁樣等, 遲早神經衰弱

Rank: 3Rank: 3


284
17#
發表於 05-9-26 17:40 |只看該作者

Re: 為何用現行方法派小一學位???有興趣入來發表一下

你有15分未好囖, 我得5分喳!
HinMa 寫道:
明天去入form,我只有15分,陪太子讀書.

Rank: 1


29
18#
發表於 05-9-26 17:48 |只看該作者

Re: 為何用現行方法派小一學位???有興趣入來發表一下

Min 10 points for child age reach 5 years 8 months or above but below 7 years old.

Rank: 4


979
19#
發表於 05-9-26 17:55 |只看該作者

Re: 為何用現行方法派小一學位???有興趣入來發表一下

0606 寫道:
你有15分未好囖, 我得5分喳!
[quote]
HinMa 寫道:
明天去入form,我只有15分,陪太子讀書.
[/quote]

0606:
其實你有15分(10分人人有+5分首名子女)先真.....

  

Rank: 3Rank: 3


284
20#
發表於 05-9-26 18:19 |只看該作者

Re: 為何用現行方法派小一學位???有興趣入來發表一下

就算到時扣門, 都係唔公平, 因為如果你只有係誠意都不能改變命運, 只有搵一D校董或有關係人士, 給你寫封信, 你才有運行! 舊年我朋友不知幾咁有heart, 幾咁有誠意去喇唦扣門, 但結果都是Sorry! 但我朋友的鄰居, 只是搵個校董寫幾句推薦信, 佢個仔未又是收左! 其實我朋友個仔, 無論天資, 表達能力, 談吐, 都高過鄰居的小朋友幾班, 你話第一輪收生, 已經講關係, 扣門更加唔駛講啦!

咁教統局, 何必"掛羊頭, 賣狗肉" 折磨我地家長足足一年的時間, 其實未又係, 無關係, 無背景, 無行!!!!!!

露比媽媽 寫道:
[quote]
josephine1818 寫道:
[quote]
0606 寫道:
介紹你看首頁的討論題目: "聯署要求取消宗教分" , 你會很有共鳴!


己看, 謝.
心情好了一點因為大家都系覺得有不同問題.
同意聯名去教統局要求提早放榜

Josephine
[/quote]

我不贊成統一派位, 我話應該在第一輪時, 該校是收160人
咪一次過收齊它啦(可以計分制度, 其餘的咪看小朋友的表現), 為何先收一半80人, 等8個月後,又等統一又收80人?
總知就是折磨緊家長.
反正次次統一派位後,  電腦很多時都是錯配, 大部份人都會去心儀的小學到扣門,  為何要入一間自己心儀的小學要咁辛
苦, 但結果又唔係實成功.
但如果是公開考試入學, 反而我贊成, 如果個小朋友是未到該
校的水平, 就算真是派到比你入到又如何?
所以我話教統局成日話統一派位是最公平喎, 本人是絶對不認同.

[/quote]
‹ 上一主題|下一主題