2022 Ib Results

shadeslayer

ratafan 發表於 22-7-16 23:54
Exactly. So after assessment by the schools after interacting with the kids and the parents (throug ...

You didn’t help me.  You clarified your earlier statement about ESF not allowing local families to do Chi B SL.  Which is good.

shadeslayer

ratafan 發表於 22-7-16 23:58
本帖最後由 ratafan 於 22-7-17 00:02 編輯

My kids studied in different IS before and we are from  ...

Just because I can write in Chinese and has Chinese ancestors doesn’t mean I have the ability to do Chi A.That is rushing in to a conclusion.I hope schools don’t do that.

What I am saying is choosing the exam to take should depend on the actual ability of the student instead of their family background.That is kind of a discrimination.Through no fault of their own, just because they came from a Chinese family they are not allowed to do Chi B SL.

I know a girl from a Chinese family whose German is better than Chinese and because she had been with a very western IS from 3 years old.

I know another Chinese girl who came from a HK family and she switched to IS in about F3 from a traditional local school. She spoke Chinese like a gweilo. Very poor.  

These are my first hand experience.  

ratafan

shadeslayer 發表於 22-7-17 00:07
本帖最後由 shadeslayer 於 22-7-17 00:12 編輯

I do know some kids who don’t converse in Chinese even they come from a local family, those would be streamed into lower set by teachers after their assessment and could still go for Chin B SL. But for those who are proven to be native (at least having the ability), they just would not be allowed to do chin B SL. That’s school policy too and the underlying philosophy of IB which I would not tend to challenge…

shadeslayer

ratafan 發表於 22-7-17 00:14
I do know some kids who don’t converse in Chinese even they come from a local family, those would  ...

What you describe here is reasonable and is about assessing the children’s ability not based on family background.   Which is not the same as your earlier posts saying family background matters.

ratafan

shadeslayer 發表於 22-7-17 00:02
You didn’t help me.  You clarified your earlier statement about ESF not allowing local families to ...

It’s school which assessed students’ ability. Unfortunately gsis didn’t hv an option for students to go for more challenging Chinese programme at IB level…so some aspiring students tend to go for German B instead…
In ESF, they also hv options like Spanish and French language B which many students would take

ratafan

shadeslayer 發表於 22-7-17 00:17
本帖最後由 shadeslayer 於 22-7-17 00:17 編輯

What you describe here is reasonable and is about a ...

Perhaps I was making a mistake. So sorry

ratafan

shadeslayer 發表於 22-7-17 00:07
本帖最後由 shadeslayer 於 22-7-17 00:14 編輯

Just because I can write in Chinese and has Chinese ...

Are there any kids in your child’s school  doing Chinese B SL while they should possess Chinese A or Chin B Hl ability?

shadeslayer

ratafan 發表於 22-7-17 00:19
Perhaps I was making a mistake. So sorry

No worries just want to understand.

shadeslayer

ratafan 發表於 22-7-17 00:22
Are there any kids in your child’s school  doing Chinese B SL while they should possess Chinese A  ...

Not that I know of.  SL subjects are not nearly as important as HL subjects anyway.  

shadeslayer

shadeslayer 發表於 22-7-17 00:31
Not that I know of.  SL subjects are not nearly as important as HL subjects anyway.

That one or two points is not as important as some parents or schools believe, if you are going to UK or US for Uni.

For HKU, May be one or two points are very important.  

Radiomama

幾年以來，類似的這帖都出現同一現象，開始時講各校成績，但之後當討論圍繞各科HL/SL, language A or B or Ab initio 的內容時，通常只剩下老鬼們。
想帶出一點，睇IB 表現不是只著眼分數，學校提供什麼科目的選擇、學生如何處理HL/SL都有影響。而如果放眼海外的大學，就更不應單追逐高分數。

shadeslayer

Radiomama 發表於 22-7-17 08:46
幾年以來，類似的這帖都出現同一現象，開始時講各校成績，但之後當討論圍繞各科HL/SL, language A or B or  ...

因為乜都計算和比較一番，容易忘記事情本質，是香港人的習慣。

ABC-DAD

shadeslayer 發表於 22-7-17 10:11
因為乜都計算和比較一番，容易忘記事情本質，是香港人的習慣。

你就那麼有代表性？
「一竹竿打一船人」合理嗎？

   按常理學校提供的，家長同學能選的都有一定限制，無論那一種課程，那是別人家的決定呀。

完成某類課程，就成某類人？不會吧？

要是大家不是在談教育，不是討論課程可帶來的好處，而是侃侃而談，覺得自己有審判任何別人的自由，那別忘你自己也參與其中。

計算比較的，是你呀。

抱歉我太坦率了

草率了

不回了

shadeslayer

ABC-DAD 發表於 22-7-18 11:58
你就那麼有代表性？
「一竹竿打一船人」合理嗎？

插嘴

barque

從少讀IS的學生就算平時家中講中文，始終因為在學校學中文的機會不太多。按我觀察，就算從少讀IS而又中文算好們的學生，如果IB讀中文A SL, 大部份都只可以拿到5/6，甚少可以拿到7。 但係他們如果讀中文B HL, 好多時都有機會拿7。 同時亦都有些直資名校考英文B HL。我相信這個是一樣道理。如果拿直資學校讀英文和重視的程度去比較IS學中文的時間，我想信IS會少很多。

另外如果打算報讀香港的大學，讀Lang B其實是一個唔錯嘅選擇，因為香港的大學只看整體IB的分數，不用去冒險去考Lang A, 而令自己隨時低一二分。特別是你不是打算在大學修讀和中文有關的學科。

如果你主要打算報讀外國的大學，其實讀Lang A或 Lang B 分別不大，因為IB分數只是大學其中一個參考，大學更看重校內成績，大學入學試和其他方面。IB整體的分數只是其中一個叄考，有些學生只會看 著grade boundaries 夠拿7就可以了。但我看到能考到英美Top 大學的同學，好多時都是那批科科都高出grade boundaries 近20分的同學。

oooray

回覆 barque 的帖子

請問你係咪教IB school嘅老師? 連細分你都睇晒, 仲可以做埋分析?

barque

本帖最後由 barque 於 22-7-18 16:19 編輯

成績單有寫grade boundaries 和你的分.
例如今年math aa hl, grade boundary for 7 係65分。有啲同學90 分

oooray

回覆 barque 的帖子

我只係知道阿囡自己的細分,其他同學冇去分享,亦冇刻意打聽。不過我好認同你嘅分析。揀科應以興趣、實用行先,無刻意去擦高分。叻嘅學生自然會有好嘅CO,IB成績只係滯後數據。

barque

oooray 發表於 22-7-18 16:44
回覆 barque 的帖子

我只係知道阿囡自己的細分,其他同學冇去分享,亦冇刻意打聽。不過我好認同你嘅分析。揀 ...

其實都沒有特別去打聽，只是剛巧女兒身邊有幾位好朋友是這樣。

BHA

https://whichschooladvisor.com/singapore/school-news/how-to-uncover-a-schools-true-ibdp-results?fbclid=IwAR16Y_fgt6CUaA5MFxH4eDDL2SD_G99ANeG_qKjEPGy3vgYIvpVHoJOf2Jg

How To Uncover a School's 'True' IBDP Results

- Look at the two ‘Cs’ - Cohort and Consistency

- Specialist Support

- The 45 Club

- In the IBO Club

- Teacher Turnover

- Bilingual Diploma