- 在線時間
- 596 小時
- 最後登錄
- 13-6-3
- 國民生產力
- 577
- 附加生產力
- 112
- 貢獻生產力
- 0
- 註冊時間
- 05-6-20
- 閱讀權限
- 10
- 帖子
- 1646
- 主題
- 655
- 精華
- 0
- 積分
- 2335
- UID
- 48817
|
Re: 加士居道循道Vs陳守仁
Some comparisons of both schools:
Study time
陳守仁 Fulltime
循道 AM/PM
Teaching medium
陳守仁 : English
循道 : Chinese
School fee
陳守仁 : $12,000/year
循道: nil (Subsidized)
Facilities at schools:
陳守仁 much better than 循道
陳守仁 : 30 classrooms, 1 hall, 1 libray, 1 全天候暖水泳池, 2 Basketball courts, 8 special rooms﹝電腦室、音樂室2個、 美勞室、常識室、學生活動室﹞, 多媒體語言教學室 etc.
循道 : 12 classrooms, 5 special rooms﹝活動室、電腦室、音樂室、輔導室、童軍室﹞, 1 playgound, 1 hall, 1 library etc.
Academic qualifications of teachers:
陳守仁 better than 循道
(over 70% of 陳守仁 teachers have bachelor degrees)
Teaching experience of teachers:
循道 longer than 陳守仁
(over 70% of 循道 teachers longer than 5 years)
Affilated secondary school
陳守仁 nil
循道 循道中學 (about 70% primary school graduates)
All in all, I believe the quality of teaching is better for 陳守仁, and 陳守仁 has the right to choose the students she prefers (the chosen candidates should have a better command of English/English standard).
The only shortcoming I can think of 陳守仁 is 直資 (you have to pay school fee and you cannot join central allocation if you accept its place) and she don't have affiliated secondary school like 循道.
|
|