- 在線時間
- 9 小時
- 最後登錄
- 21-1-9
- 國民生產力
- 54
- 附加生產力
- 398
- 貢獻生產力
- 0
- 註冊時間
- 16-7-17
- 閱讀權限
- 10
- 帖子
- 119
- 主題
- 7
- 精華
- 0
- 積分
- 571
- UID
- 2208159

|
本帖最後由 Cai-Jianlin 於 17-11-24 00:19 編輯
The faculty of engineering in HKU includes two programs and many majors for students to choose.
The two programs is BEng and BEngSci respectively.
http://engg.hku.hk/home/beng/BEng.htm
Civil engineering is under BEng, but not the BEngSciHere is the syllabus for your reference:
http://engg.hku.hk/home/syllabuses/Syllabuses-EngSc-14-15-4Y.pdf
工程科學不是香港工程師學會認可的課程,讀完不能註冊: That is very true. However, we should not judge whether a program is good or bad by these factors. We should consider other more important factors like the structure of the subjects, the exchange opportunity and the salary after graduation.
Why do we set up EngSci
"工程科學中還有流體力學,熱力學和自動控制(D好yy深的數學) ,港大這科主要是培養發展工程科學的科硏人員,另一個是培養應用這些科學於工程之上的工程師,所以人數比應用科學的工程人員是應該小D."
Partly correct, we dun need to study fluid dynamics for some EngSci students, it depends on the tracks they selected. Approximately, C&DA=Stat+CS,
Environmental Engineering=Civil+Mechanical,
Energy Engineering=Electrical+Mechanical,
Materials Engineering= Electrical+Mechanical+IMSE
Biomedical Engineering=General Engineering +Life Science
工程科學比工學學士的收生分數高了不少: Simply because of higher salary after graduation. For BEng , their paths are fixed, but for BEngSci, it is still flexible, we could work in iBank, laboratory, consultation companies. And of course, we would be more advantageous when it comes to technical emigration.
但香港現在連工程(除了 civil) 都變水泡,真是全港都無什麼前途了:
If the government supports a specific subject, then it would be a 神科
|
|