Change in application policy for ESF - 國際學校

poonseelai

伯爵府

Rank: 8 Rank: 8


	19143

82^#

發表於 17-4-7 18:38 |只看該作者

回覆樓主:

我理解之前90+% esf kindy 会上esf (假設包括60個去RC)，如果%不变，可唔可以講如一心入foundation 的學生影響应該不大

wongalison

Rank: 3 Rank: 3


	409

83^#

發表於 17-4-7 18:59 |只看該作者

有冇人知依家first round 有約幾多% esf kindie 有y1 offer (包括RC & DC)?

florenceshum

大宅

Rank: 5 Rank: 5


	2054

84^#

發表於 17-4-7 23:39 |只看該作者

回覆 hong0706 的帖子

Agree! Let's raise our concern together!!!

happeecc

Rank: 3 Rank: 3


	113

85^#

發表於 17-4-8 13:32 |只看該作者

Majority parents I know have foundation school as 1st choice and RC/DC as backup.

[img align=left]http://tickers.baby-gaga.com/t/dogdogard20070117_7_BBD+is.png[/img]

nintendo

子爵府

Rank: 7 Rank: 7 Rank: 7


	10361

86^#

發表於 17-4-8 14:39 |只看該作者

diablo3 發表於 17-4-7 17:38
While I think the acceptance rate is really low, she didnt mention the acceptance rate of non-esf kids. Do you think non-esf got offered of RC and 100% accepted it?

No schools will have 100% acceptance rate of offer.
But it was probably that non-esf kinder kids have much much higher acceptance rate.

Petitechien

Rank: 3 Rank: 3


	174

87^#

發表於 17-4-8 21:32 |只看該作者

回覆：Change in application policy for ESF

Esf kids will lose the advantage that they enjoyed before. It will be a bit unfair to some esf kinder kids. For example some live in discovery bay are under Bradbury zone. Before they will apply Bradbury and DC. Bradbury is back up . Now if they can submit one applicationWhich one should they put as their first choice. I think if they review the admission policy they should also review the zoning. Currently certain flaws exist. Some area are oversubscribed and some are under. They know the problem but they turn a blind eye to it as they will have all places taken anyway.

nintendo

子爵府

Rank: 7 Rank: 7 Rank: 7


	10361

88^#

發表於 17-4-8 22:36 |只看該作者

happeecc 發表於 17-4-8 13:32
Majority parents I know have foundation school as 1st choice and RC/DC as backup.

This is true but fact is, even the two PIS are now over subscribed.Whether they are considered first choice or second choice or third choice, they do not lack applicants.
So I do believe it is quite fair for the schools to prefer taking students that put them as first choice.
If you want so much to get into RC/DC, put them as first choice. That solve the problems.

babyonboard

大宅

Rank: 5 Rank: 5


	1368

89^#

發表於 17-4-9 06:50 |只看該作者

Petitechien 發表於 17-4-8 21:32
Esf kids will lose the advantage that they enjoyed before. It will be a bit unfair to some esf kinde ...

Exactly what I think. The school disrupted my plan. I feel angry upset and disappointed. The school change whatever and whenever they want. I gave up other school offers expecting at least 2 interview chances to year one like ESF kindy previous did. Anyway the only constructive way is to voice out my opinion to school. Hope more people will do the same.

alblanc

洋房

Rank: 2


	69

90^#

發表於 17-4-10 08:47 |只看該作者

Chase922 發表於 17-4-5 07:09
Effective from August 2017, Year 1 and Year 7 Central Admissions process for August 2018 entry will ...

現時所有ESF schools 都沒有政府資助，這個對ESF schools 收生的質數有影響嗎？會否偏向選擇有能力付擔學費的家庭，而不是有質素的學生？

SpringRollLover

洋房

Rank: 2


	67

91^#

發表於 17-4-10 09:45 |只看該作者

回覆樓主:

小朋友嚟緊會開始abacus k1！想問下點解大家都會揀foundation school 而pis做backup? 我自己住西貢區所以返CWBS or RC都方便，兩間學校分別會好大？

wongalison

Rank: 3 Rank: 3


	409

92^#

發表於 17-4-10 10:47 |只看該作者

SpringRollLover 發表於 17-4-10 09:45
小朋友嚟緊會開始abacus k1！想問下點解大家都會揀foundation school 而pis做backup? 我自己住西貢區所以返 ...

I chose RC for traditional chinese and better sch facilities.
我諗以前係因為有政府資助, foundation schools平好多, 而且PIS新d冇咁耐歷史, 而家我諗除咗地點問題之外, 會多咗人揀PIS!

男爵府

Rank: 6 Rank: 6


	7062

93^#

發表於 17-4-10 11:57 |只看該作者

alblanc 發表於 17-4-10 08:47
現時所有ESF schools 都沒有政府資助，這個對ESF schools 收生的質數有影響嗎？會否偏向選擇有能力付擔學 ...

從來esf 也是non-selective school , 宜家佢都claim 自己係non-selective . 你如何覺得以前學生質素高d？而現在不是呢？

男爵府

Rank: 6 Rank: 6


	7062

94^#

發表於 17-4-10 12:00 |只看該作者

wongalison 發表於 17-4-10 10:47
I chose RC for traditional chinese and better sch facilities.
我諗以前係因為有政府資助, foundation ...

My preference is RC too. But I heard many will choose esf foundation school due to its long history and Better IB result ( says SJS / KGV ), even RC is catching up in IB score

964000

伯爵府

Rank: 8 Rank: 8


	15714

95^#

發表於 17-4-10 12:23 |只看該作者

alblanc 發表於 17-4-10 08:47
現時所有ESF schools 都沒有政府資助，這個對ESF schools 收生的質數有影響嗎？會否偏向選擇有能力付擔學 ...

不用擔心，仍然有很多又負擔到，又有質素的學生。

nintendo

子爵府

Rank: 7 Rank: 7 Rank: 7


	10361

96^#

發表於 17-4-10 15:02 |只看該作者

本帖最後由 nintendo 於 17-4-10 15:09 編輯

alblanc 發表於 17-4-10 08:47
現時所有ESF schools 都沒有政府資助，這個對ESF schools 收生的質數有影響嗎？會否偏向選擇有能力付擔學 ...

學校唔會叫家長提供收入證明，根本唔可能知家長經濟背景。

而且，大把貴過 ESF 好多的學校，一樣收到有質素學生。

happymama2007

別墅

Rank: 4


	836

97^#

發表於 17-4-10 19:17 |只看該作者

本帖最後由 happymama2007 於 17-4-10 19:19 編輯

nintendo 發表於 17-4-8 22:36
This is true but fact is, even the two PIS are now over subscribed.Whether they are considered firs ...

個問題係新制度下，不論PIS同foundation school (尤其係PIS)會多左好多non ESF kinder 既學生有得IN。咁喺ESF kinder 玩足兩年既學生點會夠佢地爭？
除非佢個system係會Interview 晒有priority 既學生，比晒offer比符合要求既學生，先再in冇priority既學生
其實佢個system係點？

alblanc

洋房

Rank: 2


	69

98^#

發表於 17-4-10 21:39 |只看該作者

貝珠發表於 17-4-10 11:57
從來esf 也是non-selective school , 宜家佢都claim 自己係non-selective . 你如何覺得以前學生質素高d？ ...

Non-selective means? 你意思是ESF向來不會考慮所收學生的能力和質數？

我認識有子女在ESF讀的不多，但大部分都是高學歷背景的，而不是富有一族；

ESF 沒有了政府資助後，所有foundation schools 的學費已和PIS 看齊後，其實對現時PIS學校有咩影響？

男爵府

Rank: 6 Rank: 6


	7062

99^#

發表於 17-4-10 21:50 |只看該作者

alblanc 發表於 17-4-10 21:39
Non-selective means? 你意思是ESF向來不會考慮所收學生的能力和質數？

我認識有子女在ESF讀的不多，但 ...

Non - selective 意思係主要看英語溝通能力，社交能力，pass 到requirement 之後再按priority及random number 收生。英基向來不是拔尖的學校。假如，申請人A能力超過同齡，英文及social skill 也合乎預期，而申請人B能力一般，英文及social skill 只是合格。假設兩個申請人皆冇priority , 但如申請人B random number 高d，esf 會收申請人B 先