本帖最後由 dillon 於 16-9-27 13:15 編輯
KikiDaddy 發表於 16-9-27 07:16 
回覆 Wilma88 的帖子
OK. Let's assume all the boys from 基 全 小 學 下 午 校 were band 2 or band 3, ...
Why assume when there are readily available data? The best indicator of intake quality of any secondary school is the Pre-S1 scores, and by comparing the scores with DSE results 6 years later gives you a rough estimate of value-addedness. You can find these data easily from YWC’s annual reports.
I have read some analysis on BK placing the DSE results of YWC in B1b. You may want to know that the Pre-S1 scores of the same group of students were probably in the borderline of B1 and B2.
As for the student intake of YWPS when it was a subsidized school, bear in mind that SSP is the poorest district in HK. The average household income in SSP is less than half of that of more affluent districts like Wanchai. It is reasonable to expect SSP students in general have less family resource and support than their counterparts in other districts, which probably will be reflected in student quality. Also, not all the top students from YWPS choose to go to YWC. In the year my older son graduated from YWPS six of his classmates went to SPCC. That was in the subsidized school era. Direct-subsidized students are likely in a better position to go elsewhere.
This thread is meant to be for parents interested in YWPS, and they may want to get some information on YWC due to the through-train arrangements. Let’s focus on discussions that can help these parents prepare their interviews and make decisions, and comments should be based on facts rather than assumptions or personal perceptions. | 
發表於 16-9-27 13:07
