- 在線時間
- 0 小時
- 最後登錄
- 16-6-21
- 國民生產力
- 0
- 附加生產力
- 208
- 貢獻生產力
- 0
- 註冊時間
- 12-4-3
- 閱讀權限
- 10
- 帖子
- 59
- 主題
- 2
- 精華
- 0
- 積分
- 267
- UID
- 898081
|
本帖最後由 Birkin 於 16-3-8 15:00 編輯
nov21 發表於 16-3-8 13:21
關於那些所謂“擔憂”的
父母的真面目
所謂“擔憂”的父母所犯下的“七宗罪”:
他們貪戀勝利並以損害自己子女的利益為代價;
他們過分渴望獲得公眾的認可;
他們貪婪地企圖控制理事會;
他們懶於去尋找真相;
他們憤怒地企圖“剷除”攔路者/異己;
他們妒忌理事會在學校管理方面的權力;
他們傲慢地拒絕承認自己一直以來的錯誤。
他們的不對行為:
...
But this is precisely what I mean - another one-sided argument based on opinions not facts. There is no reference to any facts to support accusations like: "他們貪戀勝利並以損害自己子女的利益為代價", "他們憤怒地企圖“剷除”攔路者/異己", "他們妒忌理事會在學校管理方面的權力"... Who are these angry, arrogant parents that the article referred to? Who wrote this article? Who do they represent? Have they formed some sort of a quasi-formal group to represent "the silent majority" and try to communicate with the school or the other "angry, arrogant parents" with some sort of constructive suggestions on how to resolve their differences? In my opinion, this type of articles is doing CDNIS a disservice and creates the impression that the school community is still very much divided with no proposals on how to move forward.
|
|