IB 出路

ANChan59

poonseelai 發表於 16-1-20 06:53
完全同意! 近年好多聲音話 non jupas 是入資助大學學位捷徑, 矛頭仲直指IB, 各大學可能会越收越少 non jupa ...

維持現在的DSE狀況，大學都有壓力收多些好的香港本土學生，NJ是必然的方向！

964000

原帖由 ANChan59 於 16-01-20 發表
維持現在的DSE狀況，大學都有壓力收多些好的香港本土學生，NJ是必然的方向！ ...

Honestly, if your target is local u, DSE is still the better and more straight forward route. You never know what will happen at the end, the NJ quotas may shrink in the future due to political pressure.

964000

原帖由 964000 於 16-01-20 發表
Honestly, if your target is local u, DSE is still the better and more straight forward route. You ne ...

Maybe I should rephrase, " If your target is mainly local school..."

HKTHK

回覆 964000 的帖子

I would not recommend IB if one is targeting local university unless you are a believer in the IB educational model

NoahArk

Stay in the mainstream and don't bother with IB unless you know what it is and really like it. Not everyone deserves IB (or, put it mildly, IB is not for everyone).

slamai

點評 @ 56#
daisychan  請問你有冇去過大學的 information days 聽過？  發表於 昨天 23:02




Too many to mention but I did not go to those in the last two years except for the HKU Medicine talk this year.

slamai

poonseelai 發表於 16-1-19 19:28
原則上無, 但實際上各院校自設限額

I think using "quota" for local non-JUPAS is an overstatement.  It should be a "trend" instead.  More often than not, IB applicants come from more resourceful families and many of them target 三大或「神科」, leaving other choices for DSE applicants.  The roughly 20% "quota" for local non-JUPAS "observed" is more likely an average figure which has mixed up 「神科」and other programmes.  Such % "quota" of 「神科」has been observed to be higher than the average figure.

Despite the above, the key to picking choices in university applications is to look at the previous admission scores of these programmes viz-a-viz the applicant's predicted grade, amongst other considerations.

HKTHK

回覆 NoahArk 的帖子

Some people's goal is to get into a specific subject at a specific university. Some people's goal is to get an education. Not sure there is a right or wrong but if one's desire is to get into medicine or law in HK, IB is certainly the tougher path

shadeslayer

原帖由 poonseelai 於 16-01-20 發表
完全同意! 近年好多聲音話 non jupas 是入資助大學學位捷徑, 矛頭仲直指IB, 各大學可能会越收越少 non jupa ...

Yes, these people have to pay for private education and not enjoying HK aided secondary education and in Uni they do not have the same right?  They are the same tax paying citizens.

NoahArk

Many people don't buy into local education no matter how much taxes they are paying. I for one am happily contributing to HKSAR's budget but choose to opt out when it comes to my kids' education.

NoahArk

HKTHK 發表於 16-1-20 14:16
回覆 NoahArk 的帖子

Some people's goal is to get into a specific subject at a specific university.  ...

Agree that it's probably easier to get into HKU/HKCU law/medicine (or global finance for that matter) with HKDSE results (not that everybody cares about HKU/HKCU though).

ABC-DAD

shadeslayer 發表於 16-1-20 14:26
Yes, these people have to pay for private education and not enjoying HK aided secondary education an ...

It is your choice to pay extra for education that you think is good. Even private school,the venue is using Public Resources. Can you point out how thier right being hindered?

ABC-DAD

Should extra size of land granted to IS comparing to local school be count unfair? I doubted that.

annie40

每次講公平，就是太敏感了。總之大家養育孩子，他們最少要有本事交稅就是。

shadeslayer

原帖由 ABC-DAD 於 16-01-20 發表
It is your choice to pay extra for education that you think is good. Even private school,the venue i ...

I am saying for HK citizen paying HK tax, their children for some reason did not follow the DSE route, they should have the same right and opportunities to aided uni education in HK as the DSE route, if that is what they prefer.  

Putting a ceiling on HK citizen intake from the Non Jupas route is damaging HK citizen's right and opportunity to aided uni education.  I think it is more than unfair, it is downright discrimination.  

Government aided secondary education is available to all HK citizens, the eligibility does not contingent on the "kind" of primary education the children follow. Private secondary education is therefore by choice, that is ok. Tell me why would aided uni education for HK citizen should be contingent on having  DSE diploma, or a limit on how many non Jupas HK citizens the uni can take?

shadeslayer

原帖由 ABC-DAD 於 16-01-20 發表
Should extra size of land granted to IS comparing to local school be count unfair? I doubted that.

Unrelated to what I was trying to say. See my last post.

shadeslayer

原帖由 卓遙 於 16-01-20 發表
回覆 shadeslayer 的帖子

Official or unofficial limits on non Jupas intake which affected HK citizens are being placed. Eg HKU med school.

ABC-DAD

If it is all about Medical School,as a matter of fact,  there are  ceilings on both HKU n CUHK for medical students each year, are there?

daisychan

slamai 發表於 16-1-20 13:41
I think using "quota" for local non-JUPAS is an overstatement.  It should be a "trend" instead.  Mor ...

No, the term "quota" was used by those speakers for the「神科」on their Information Days.