- 在線時間
- 741 小時
- 最後登錄
- 20-9-29
- 國民生產力
- 8
- 附加生產力
- 3924
- 貢獻生產力
- 0
- 註冊時間
- 11-8-13
- 閱讀權限
- 10
- 帖子
- 1684
- 主題
- 20
- 精華
- 0
- 積分
- 5616
- UID
- 788348
|
imconfusing 發表於 15-4-2 14:37
Thx. I agree that providing an English speaking home to achieve native level proficiency in English ... As educators the schools know about the age gap too, and unlike the local kindergardens who are measured by their students' elite primary school entrance results, through-trains would see things longer-term. As I said my son has gone though IS interview where he was judged, some as a big B and some as a small B. In the end he passed them regardless, so just try your best to groom your child socially, physically & mentally and forget about that birth date on his application. Some schools actually place kids born within adjacent 3 months together for the interview, and I think that is wise. Whether you prefer a school where you child is not too young (jan-dec cut off) or not minding that he's being one of the youngest (Sept-Aug) that's another story.
My son happens to be the only kid in class born near the end of the year. The rest are born Jan-Aug. When I found out I almost flipped! He was more cranky and immature compared with others, but I noticed some of the older kids are more naughty too. I asked the school to assess him in hopes of retaining him a year, but nope, they said it would actually do him more harm. He is one of the most articulate kid in class, sociable and academically smacked in the middle. Retaining him a year would leave him socially cut off. There are proofs on both ends of the spectrum about being the youngest or red-shirting a child (putting them back a year), so do not judge by a date on the calendar and nurture your child as he is. There is no need to compare, and they would naturally has to work harder in class (until the difference levels out at around age 8-10), so it could be a good character development for them too.
|
|