- 在線時間
- 170 小時
- 最後登錄
- 23-10-4
- 國民生產力
- 7
- 附加生產力
- 1615
- 貢獻生產力
- 0
- 註冊時間
- 04-9-25
- 閱讀權限
- 10
- 帖子
- 289
- 主題
- 6
- 精華
- 0
- 積分
- 1911
- UID
- 31364
|
Why bother to revive a thread that has been subjected to abuse by irrational ISF haters?
Anyhow, having been a sufficiently long-time ISF parents (over 4 years), I guess I know the school better than some of the participants in this forum. Here is my two-cents’ worth.
ISF is very resourceful and stuffed with people who whole-heartedly care about education and promotion of, as the name of the school suggests, independence in thought and action. Name one school in Hong Kong that offers year-long programmes on Latin, works of Cierco and Plato, Greeks theatres and works of ancient Chinese philosophers; any schools in this place that spends months on and honestly look at the origin and aftermath of the so-called cultural revolution. Show me one school that regularly sends their students to Cambridge U to work there as Summer interns, and take the young historians and Latin students to Rome to have a crash course on Latin and ancient Roman history. Is ISF one of the best? Who cares? And what is your definition of the best? To me, ISF is good enough. Good enough is good enough is good enough. There is an old Chinese saying “如入寶山空手回”. Hand on my heart, I do think that ISF is a 寶山. The school is very resourceful and endeavours to make opportunities open to all students. It does not matter whether a particular student is a high-flyer or under-achiever. As long the student is willing to try and take on a task, he or she will have his/her chance. The sad thing is, as the Chinese saying goes, many people 入寶山 but空手回. (My guess is that ISF haters are among them.) And they blame the school for their leaving the 寶山 empty-handedly. I can only share my sympathy with them.
Many people accuse ISF of being not “international” enough. Nonsense. Apparently, to the less informed narrow-minded, Chinese and Asian cultures are not part of the international world. To them, a school stuffed with Caucasians is an “international” school; a school with yellow or brown-skinned is “local”. To me, a school with students who see the beauty of Tang poems as well as Jane Austen’s and Dostoyevsky’s work, appreciate the beauty of Erhu and Western violin pieces, are open to both the Israelis and Palestinian views over the conflict between Christianity and Islam is a truly “international” school. I have friends who have kids at one of the so-called “international” schools. Sadly, their kids refuse to speak Chinese (they are Chinese), hate anything Asian, despise anything Chinese and wholesomely dismiss anything non-Western. And you tell me they are more “international”? Come on, you must me kidding me.
|
|