英文通識

bestwish

shadeslayer 發表於 14-8-11 13:05
「個細路睇新聞係中文，用中文思考、回答會自由D。」

xxxxx

個game就係禁玩, 睇你識唔識玩law !

DSE 講分數, 用中文卷有把握取高分咪揀中文卷law, 你覺得用英文答會高分D咪揀英文答law !

話知你係咪英中個名 ! 最緊要識玩呢個遊戲 !

學生可以英文5**, 亦都可以同時通識中文卷攞5**。 禁你可唔可以話佢英文唔得 !

英文叻唔叻, 唔係睇通識科用中文定英文教去判斷 ! 而係最重要睇英文科的成績 !

bestwish

tcmsung 發表於 14-8-11 13:25
而家不是由個別學生來決定，是由校長定下的政策。是校長的信心問題。

睇埋校長識唔識玩呢個game law.

校長對學生有信心, 用英文教通識及DSE有好成績係好事。 但唔排除或無人知, 如果佢揀中文教通識, 學生的通識科成績可能比英文教會更好。

shadeslayer

原帖由 bestwish 於 14-08-11 發表
本帖最後由 bestwish 於 14-8-11 13:33 編輯

校長不理語文政策，不理學生能不能用英文學習，名不乎實地用中文教，又貪圖英文班之名，只顧功利地玩個拿分遊戲，是反面教材。學生學到咩呢？

shadeslayer

原帖由 bestwish 於 14-08-11 發表
本帖最後由 bestwish 於 14-8-11 13:33 編輯

我好肯定大部份學生用中文學通識，歷史地理，音樂，體育等等用中文會好些，咁做乜貪圖英中之名，沽名釣譽呢？改哂做中文班咪得囉。

jessimm

回覆 tcmsung 的帖子

tcmsung 發表於 14-8-11 13:15
咁如果一個來自英中的醫科生，來問你㨂用英語定中文，你會怎樣給意見？


醫委會 doesn't care. who care

bestwish

shadeslayer 發表於 14-8-11 13:46
我好肯定大部份學生用中文學通識，歷史地理，音樂，體育等等用中文會好些，咁做乜貪圖英中之名，沽名釣譽呢 ...

其實講返個政策已經冇emi or cmi !!!!


http://www.edb.gov.hk/tc/about-edb/press/speeches/sed/2012/20090311151551.html

又何來貪圖英中之名 !

ceomum

呀女間學校都係用英文通識！放榜前我有問佢點解唔選中文卷答？

唔係應該會容易點嗎？呀女答我用開英文好多詞語要轉反中文作答

反而無咁好不過幾萬個考生得8千幾個用英卷考又真係有點那個

shadeslayer

原帖由 bestwish 於 14-08-11 發表
本帖最後由 bestwish 於 14-8-11 14:02 編輯

貪圖英文班之名。ok? 打少隻字都唔明。

nintendo

shadeslayer 發表於 14-8-11 13:46
我好肯定大部份學生用中文學通識，歷史地理，音樂，體育等等用中文會好些，咁做乜貪圖英中之名，沽名釣譽呢 ...

Even with the so called english medium schools, the standard of english is second language level. No overseas universities recognise them as genuine english medium schools, and all students are requested to take TOEFL or IELTS （Students from international schools do not have to sit for TOEFL or IELTS, although some still chose to do so).

I think we all understand that the english medium schools in Hong Kong merely means more immersion in english environment. Students do not have (may be some do but not majority) english standard at native or first language level. I think it is quite acceptable to have some of the subjects taught in Chinese or even using Chinese test or exam papers.

I am not sure why your are so concerned. May be you think they kind of cheat by finding an easy way? But well, universities know what standard the students are, do they? If universities have no problem with taking students from even chinese medium schools, what is the problem with english medium schools teaching in chinese. I think we do not have to be too 睇唔過眼

bestwish

ceomum 發表於 14-8-11 14:02
呀女間學校都係用英文通識！放榜前我有問佢點解唔選中文卷答？

唔係應該會容易點嗎？呀女答我用開英文好多 ...

數字勝於一切  !

jessimm

tcmsung 發表於 14-8-11 14:18
講到底，醫委會都唔 care 的醫生來自英中定中中啦，咁點解當年又咁辛苦爭取入英中?

培正理科都好好，都有 ...

西醫就是西醫. 唔通睇西醫就要用英語.

shadeslayer

原帖由 nintendo 於 14-08-11 發表
本帖最後由 nintendo 於 14-8-11 14:22 編輯

second language can also be an effective medium of instruction.  normally IELTS 6.5 or 7.0 are.deemed sufficient for University education in English.  many HK students can achieve that.

i am not concerned, i just do not respect schools who do not stay true to themselves.

jessimm

回覆 tcmsung 的帖子

One subject in English will lead to high end education. Don't fool.

jessimm

回覆 tcmsung 的帖子

off-topic and scornful