Ackl1002 發表於 14-5-7 08:57 
Maybe those kids overseas dont go to phonics classes specifically, they learned their phonics from e ... Copied from wiki:
Jolly Phonics has attracted much controversy over the years. At one point, it was being used in 68% of UK primary schools when government policy advocated the opposite method of 'whole word' learning, indicating that support to retain (which?) previous policy had been lost. A research project in Clackmannanshire also demonstrated a large difference in pupils' learning (how?).[7] Critics have argued that not all children benefit from the synthetic phonics method.[8] Some people's views (whose?) are that more time should be spent teaching children how to write whole words and say the alphabet in the traditional manner instead of breaking words down into letter sounds then blending them to read. One of the major concerns regarding synthetic phonics is that it is taught in isolation and is boring for students [needs citation]. However, within effective literacy instruction, neither of these assumptions is true. Phonics instruction is part of a balanced literacy approach (which is very different from whole language) and should never be taught exclusive of meaningful connections to text.[9] In addition, many teachers find that the interactive premise behind Jolly Phonics makes it fun for kids. | 
發表於 14-5-7 09:09
)而且開始見到她開始學唔到嘢，老師講完番來都唔知發生什麼事，所以決定再為她轉去另一間學校學。她由k3開始轉到這裡學，老師唔理你基礎學成點，都要由頭開始，需然如此，老師見她情況許可之下，把速度加快，到現在她已經常嘗試自己去拼啲字讀來，我覺得這樣就已經足夠了。而且現在老師會就課程中已經學過的音母去拼一啲字出來比她每堂默10個，家長冇壓力，小朋友更加冇壓力，每星期只要讀五次都可以掌握得到，所以我覺得學拼音是有用，只不過老師是否識合自己的小朋友，你不坊去找另一個老師試一試呀!