有冇人今天去左英皇書院中一講座?情況如何?

loktungpapa

這樣說，筲官的成績都不錯啊！

yekat169

Deleted

畢學武

yekat169 發表於 13-12-17 19:55
好多學校都有報d學生去左邊間海外大學, 但St.Paul好多去果d絕對唔係名不經傳既大學  ...

Please note that the elite oversea universities listed in the SPC web sites are universities attended by all former SPC students, not the students graduate in 2012. It is not unusual for a such a long history secondary school in Hog Kong has such a university placement over the years. Sure, SPC is a good school though KC is always a bit better academically. But I think such a small difference should not be taken into account for school choosing.

Do you have other source for the U placement of SPC of the year 2012/2013?

Deepblue

jessimm 發表於 13-12-17 15:51
回覆 yekat169 的帖子

從各校school information 所得知, 若要說KC的成績唏噓, SJC 這兩年更不遑多讓, Wan ...

不會吧!

DBS 這兩年的成績令人失望, 但其他的如QC, SJC, 不是仍保住地位嗎?

yekat169

Deepblue 發表於 13-12-24 11:41
不會吧!

DBS 這兩年的成績令人失望, 但其他的如QC, SJC, 不是仍保住地位嗎?

Deleted

yekat169

畢學武 發表於 13-12-24 00:25
Please note that the elite oversea universities listed in the SPC web sites are universities attend ...

Deleted

畢學武

Deepblue 發表於 13-12-24 11:41
不會吧!

DBS 這兩年的成績令人失望, 但其他的如QC, SJC, 不是仍保住地位嗎?

                      % gov funded degree

Wah Yan HK                    55%

SPC                                  44%

QC                                    64%

KC                                    61%

SJC                                  63.4%

extracted from http://www.edu-kingdom.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=2622398&extra=page%3D1&page=16

       我唔知是否唏噓，不過赛果正常，QC一向比KC成績好一點。

畢學武

ohnono 發表於 13-12-17 21:37
我諗真係不用太介懷那些入U率的數字，去到這類咁受歡迎的學校，學校可以做的就是自行收生時可以用盡那只佔 ...
要比較的話，我只會喜歡從各學校的各科成績看學校在那方面較強、那方面較弱算了。好像ST Joe在英文方面較強的，對英文成績好的同學一定會有推動力。相反你英文較弱的，會追得相當辛苦。數理科好的，就揀QC和King's啦，對嗎！

同意，數理科一向是ＫＣ強項，我剛剛收到以下E-mail:

Dear alumni,

I cannot wait sharing with you a piece of good news reported in the media today.

Our student LO Kwun YU a deemed budding scientist attained a grand honour in scientific investigation in the Mainland lately.  He won numerous awards in science in his secondary school years, namely, IJSO (International Junior Science Olympiad)in S.3 and the Champion in the National Danish Science Competition in S.5.

He is selected to join an international science competition (International Sustainable World Energy Engineering Environemnt Project Olympaid, I-SWEEP)  in USA in May 2014 immedately after the HKDSE examination 2014.

Adding to that, another team (Chan Tai Hei and Fang Er Hai in S.6) is also selected to join the Intel Science Competiton also in USA in May 2014.

Fang Er Hai is offered a place in Tsinghua University in September 2014 (after Cai Zi Hong in Sept 2013)  and he is now striving for a place in MIT.

News coverage on 22 Dec 2014:

http://news.takungpao.com/paper/q/2013/1222/2122642.html

http://hk.news.yahoo.com/%E6%B8%AF%E7%94%9F%E7%A0%94-%E7%92%B0%E4%BF%9D%E9%AD%94%E7%8F%A0-%E5%A5%AA%E5%B0%8F%E5%B0%8F%E7%A7%91%E5%AD%B8%E5%AE%B6%E7%8D%8E-223022540.html

http://orientaldaily.on.cc/cnt/news/20131222/00176_045.html

http://www.singpao.com/xw/gat/201312/t20131222_479718.html

Glory to King's!  

Warmest christmas greetings,

Nancy

另外，有前ＫＣ校長曾對我說：ＫＣ在興建西翼時重建了實驗室，設備第一流，甚至比美大學！

我不相信大學實驗室對中學生有用，亦不認為有個別學生得獎就是好成績(正如我不認為有個別學生在香港資优學院一個課程達到level 3就是好學校一樣！)。不過KC着重數理科的傳统應該是保存下來。

畢學武

yekat169 發表於 13-12-17 21:57
其實升中學生得個十一,二歲, 又點睇得出佢係數理專家定係語言專家? 根本中學d數學同小學什至係奧數完全唔 ...

如果小心觀察是可以知道小朋友的興趣和傾向。

我中一時就有同學識計Calculus,上堂時同數學老師講'D一Ｄ佢'(differentiation)。有人睇有關quantum theory, relativity, evolution的書。我有理由相信他們小學時以經是這樣。

我認識一個小朋友很喜歡看有關恐龍的書(英文)，你不會認為他衹喜歡恐龍和其他古生物的又長又臭的英文學名吧！

如果小朋友很有興趣和你做一些簡單物理實驗：如在Kitchen煲水，觀察boiling water, evaporation/condensation 你不會以為他衹是喜歡玩火吧！

如果小朋友要求你和他解剖牛眼，豬心，青蛙(街市田雞)，你不會以為他會是變態殺手吧！

如果小朋友可以self-publish a book http://bookstore.kidpub.com/?utm_source=KidPub+Press+Active&utm_campaign=2f3087e704-Christmas_2012_Publishing_Package&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_c91ccd5e54-2f3087e704-3436829

或參加 Young Writers Award  http://www.hkywa.com/ 好明顯，他有語文天份！

你可能覺得以上例子太明顯，大多數小朋友不是這樣。很簡單，多帶他們上兒童圖書館，衹要觀察他們喜愛閱讀那一類圖書就可以了。

畢學武

回覆 talent2000 的帖子

Hei, please relax.

I haven't said 資优課程無料到. I only say that the achievement of small no. of students is not representative. It cannot reflect the whole picture of the school.

Can you read?

By the way, It is what you have written:

好像甚麼資优學院，你們可以知道幾多？參與幾多？受益幾多？睇過啲課程白痴無聊又set 呢样果样

yekat169

觀點與角度問題...有d人覺得出到星星狀元就係好學校, 有d覺得100%入u就係, 亦有d認為將學生升grade就係,  睇下你想點睇

elbar

畢學武 發表於 13-12-25 00:03
% gov funded degree

Wah Yan HK                    55%

SPC                                  44%

QC                                    64%

KC                                    61%

SJC                                  63.4%

                     

Wah Yan HK                    55%
SJC                                  63.4%

係 入讀本港大學率 (只限大學學位課程，包括政府資助和非資助)

而不是 入讀本港8大資助大學學位課程率 不能直接比較

greenapple1093

回覆 elbar 的帖子


The list of the gifted education provided by the EDB represents a small no of outstanding students in a particular area. It cannot represent the overall performance of each school. The results of IB, team spirit, leadership, 33222 percentage in DSE, alumni network and support, participation in ECA and other competitions are all factors affecting the whole performance of a school. Using only one indicator to assess a school will distort our decision making.

畢學武

回覆 elbar 的帖子

多謝指正。
咁是否QC, KC ,SPC的%是八大資助學位課程？
SJC和WYHK的八大資助學位課程%更低？

greenapple1093

I do not understand why someone always use the result of gifted education of EDB to appreciate the performance of that school.

On the other hand, I agree that the students in King's College are not the best in Central District. It may be band 1B school as reflected by the fair DSE results in 2013 written in the leaflet. (Note: According to statistics results provided by khama, King's College is band 1C and 1A in 2009 and 2010 respectively) Although they are good at Maths.,Science and Technology, there is still a lot of improvement in both languages.

畢學武

回覆 greenapple1093 的帖子

深表同意！