- 在線時間
- 780 小時
- 最後登錄
- 23-8-15
- 國民生產力
- 0
- 附加生產力
- 4260
- 貢獻生產力
- 0
- 註冊時間
- 10-11-12
- 閱讀權限
- 10
- 帖子
- 1897
- 主題
- 65
- 精華
- 0
- 積分
- 6157
- UID
- 677880
|
smallman37 發表於 13-10-25 01:47
Yes i heard quite a good number of box hill fotan student got into RC (but just heard no statistics ...
I won't say the tuition fees of TT and Anfield are similar. TT charges HK$7,900 (for AM session) x 12 months, whereas Anfield charges HK$6,800 x 10 months.
Apart from Anfield Whampoa which my boy is currently attending, I cannot give comments on the other schools since I do not know much about them. I am happy with Anfield so far. Anfield provides a genuine English environment to the extent that even the helpers speak English. As such, the exposure to Mandarin is minimal, only 30mins per day indeed. Hence it did catch me by surprise when my boy started singing Mandarin songs (at least 3 songs from what I heard), and can speak bits and pieces of Mandarin after attending school for 2 months. To me personally, English being the first international language is still most important, and for Chinese, as long as he can read and speak and write simple Chinese, I am satisfied. I also like the small class size with 14 students vs 2 teachers plus mandarin teacher on and off during lesson. Of coz I chose Anfield Whampoa also becoz it is close to home, coz I want to avoid unnecessary travelling at this age. To me, school at this age = play play and play, so I won't expect much academically, except a good language environment. I always believe language cannot be taught, you have to be immersed in the environment to pick up a language.
|
|