本帖最後由 CPU1995 於 13-2-12 09:44 編輯
vavalui 發表於 13-2-10 23:35
其實要好視乎你小朋友level, St Paul 固然好d,不過如果你小朋友入到St Paul跟唔到都賺搞 ...
If both schools are of same caliber, I would choose co-edu school rather than boys school. I think co-edu system is better than boys school for a child’s social development. Unfortunately, most top notch traditional schools are not co-edu schools in HK.
When comparing SPC with other traditional schools, I don’t think SPC’s teaching curriculum is difficult to follow. Unlike other traditonal schools, there is no need for SPC boys to attend extra private tuition.
(i) SPC’s exams papers are written according to the EDB curriculum what the teachers have daily taught. Before the exam, there are many mini-tests.
(ii) Students and parents can access to the intranet whereas there are homework, test schedule and past exams papers with solutions of some subjects like Maths, Computer, IS etc. Students can practise nearly ten years’ Maths past exam papers beforehand.
I think SPC has excellent funding. Students joining ECAs like fencing, hockey, Chinese writing etc can be reimbursed nearly 80% of the fees upon satisfactory attendance rate.
If you target your child to study abroad, SPC paves the way to equip their students. SPC has GCSE Spanish and French courses which are taught for 3.5 hours every Saturday and is a member of International Boys Schools Coalition.
I understand many headmasters of elite UK boarding schools would have no hesitation to admit SPC boys.
|