本帖最後由 cutemama2010 於 12-11-20 20:24 編輯
如果真喺要比較, 就要做功課, 查一查教育局做嘅視學報告/全面評鑑對2間中, 小學嘅獨立評價以作比較. 教育局做嘅視學報告/全面評鑑, 不會偏幫任何一間學校.
Comprehensive Review Report – Pui Kiu College http://www.edb.gov.hk/FileManager/EN/Content_8620/pui_kiu_college.pdf
Student Performance - Page 16
In the PS, student performance is good in English but barely acceptable in Chinese Language. Their performance in Mathematics needs improvement. In the SS, only one cohort of students has sat for the Hong Kong Certificate of Education Examination (HKCEE) since the school was founded. In 2010, the percentage of students with 14 or more points in the best six subjects in the HKCEE was slightly below the territory average for day-school students. In comparison with schools with similar S1 intake, the school performed barely satisfactorily in the HKCEE in 2010 and the performance was slightly below the expected level.
可參考2011年EDB的陸慶濤<全面評鑑報告>：
http://www.edb.gov.hk/index.aspx?nodeID=8721&langno=2
報告內p.12 2.4學生表現
學 生 在 中 文 、 英 文 及 數 學 三 科 的 表 現 良 好 。
Comprehensive ReviewReport – PLK Laws Foundation College
http://www.edb.gov.hk/FileManager/EN/Content_8036/plk_laws_foundation_coll.pdf
Student Performance - Page19
The performance of the first cohort of students in the Hong Kong Certificate of Education Examination (HKCEE) in 2009 was very good. The percentage of students obtaining 14 or more points in the best six subjects in the HKCEE was much higher than the territory average for day-school students. In comparison with schools with similar S1 intake, the school performed very well in the HKCEE and the performance far exceeded the expected level.
一間低/負增值而另一間是高增值, 其它方面自己睇報告比較吧!
| 
發表於 12-11-20 13:55
