- 在線時間
- 208 小時
- 最後登錄
- 17-6-27
- 國民生產力
- 0
- 附加生產力
- 1211
- 貢獻生產力
- 0
- 註冊時間
- 11-9-27
- 閱讀權限
- 10
- 帖子
- 135
- 主題
- 32
- 精華
- 0
- 積分
- 1346
- UID
- 808724
|
Shootastar 發表於 12-11-21 11:22
So it is not a bad idea that the kid receives primary education in a local school. If he can cope with the learning environment in local secondary school, there is no need to make a switch. If he wants to explore other options, then make a try in an IS.
I am in the midst of struggle whether I should send my kid to LS or IS for his primary education. And I am interested in what you have shared.
You said it is not a bad idea to study in LS at the beginning. Do you mean that the academic foundation will be stronger if the kid goes to LS? And, if he switches to IS at secondary level, he will be in an advantageoous position because he is already academically strong? You said your kids went to good, but not top local primary schools. Did they have to pay tonnes of efforts, particularly in English, to catch up with their fellow classmates in IS?
A friend of mine has just switched to an IS from a LS at secondary level. He's realized that his English lags far behind his schoolmates. Did your children encounter similar problem, and if yes, how long did they need to catch up with their counterparts? Did they enjoy studying in IS more than LS?
I have similar planning for my kid. If it is convenient, may you share which IS your children went to? Many many thanks.
|
|