福附的偉大邏輯 - 福建中學附屬學校

登錄 | 註冊

討論區

教育王國: 教育講場; 使用意見

幼兒教育: 幼校討論; 幼教雜談

小學教育: 小一選校; 小學雜談

中學教育: 升中派位; 中學交流; 初中教育

專上教育: 備戰大學; 選科選校

國際教育: 國際學校; 海外留學

知識增值: 課外活動; 教材閱讀; 公開考試; 深造進修

特殊教育: 特殊教育; 資優教育; 自閉寶寶; 智能評估

徵求專區: 二手市場; 誠徵老師; 組班專區; 徵保母車

聯絡管理員

我的中心

教育王國 › 討論區 › 福建中學附屬學校 › 福附的偉大邏輯

查看: 2255\|回覆: 11	go 福附的偉大邏輯 [複製鏈接]

kakadaddy

大宅

Rank: 5 Rank: 5


	1759

1^#

發表於 12-9-17 16:20 |只看該作者 |倒序瀏覽 |打印

福附的偉大邏輯 : 準時交功課, 但功課中有些微漏做, 即使是漏做一條, 都等於欠交功課。

0 0 0 0

返回頂部

ilovefssas

洋房

Rank: 2


	99

2^#

發表於 12-9-18 23:05 |只看該作者

根本就係要迎合福中死板嘅規矩

點評

meimeima It seems P1 & P2 are changing teaching philosophy. My kid is studying P1 now and after 3 weeks experience, I'm quite satisfied. Regarding rules, I think each school can have its own setting. 發表於 12-9-25 12:52

kakadaddy Thx for your attention, people here seem so frigid about topic. 發表於 12-9-19 18:33

返回頂部

baba987

禁止訪問


	2754

3^#

發表於 12-9-20 17:08 |只看該作者

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

返回頂部

MaMaHH

大宅

Rank: 5 Rank: 5


	1746

4^#

發表於 12-9-20 17:26 |只看該作者

回復 kakadaddy 的帖子

Kakadaddy, may think to talk with the related officer directly to find improvement. According to my observation, most of the officers are new and young, they need your 'challenge' to perfectise their decision and learn to think from different aspects. In my experience, they are positive to make change and will listen to parents' opinions.

返回頂部

kmlaw3

洋房

Rank: 2


	58

5^#

發表於 12-9-20 23:06 |只看該作者

Be positive thinking, should you find it is too harsh for those little kids, you should approach the school for understanding her stands and find the way out. Communication is essential to both parties. Although I am just a P1's parent, I don't feel that the school would refuse to listen your opinion.

點評

kakadaddy what is "too harsh for a kid"? U mean the rule of something else? 發表於 12-9-21 16:00

返回頂部

kakadaddy

大宅

Rank: 5 Rank: 5


	1759

6^#

發表於 12-9-21 15:58 |只看該作者

回復 MaMaHH 的帖子

My case has been settled, but the rule is still there, it's absurd. i have talked with PTA, they agreed my point of view and agreed to talk with the principal.

返回頂部

EYUNG

複式洋房

Rank: 3 Rank: 3


	462

7^#

發表於 12-9-21 17:26 |只看該作者

舊年是漏做 4 題就當欠交, 漏1題只是圈題.

返回頂部

kakadaddy

大宅

Rank: 5 Rank: 5


	1759

8^#

發表於 12-9-21 18:17 |只看該作者

Why"漏做 4 題就當欠交"?
We should count how many Questions, we should consider the percentage. Do U think it's more reasonable and logical?
why do we go to school?
my ans is : to learn the way to think instead of to learn to way to follow.

返回頂部

EYUNG

複式洋房

Rank: 3 Rank: 3


	462

9^#

發表於 12-9-22 00:59 |只看該作者

因已是高年級, 我並沒有睇佢功課, 幸好還可以交齊。欠幾多條先叫欠功課, 總有一條線, 我們都認為4條是合理, 4條可以係半頁至一頁的功課, 量也不少。返學要尋求知識, 學守規矩同樣重要。

點評

meimeima Agreed. 發表於 12-9-25 12:53

返回頂部

kakadaddy

大宅

Rank: 5 Rank: 5


	1759

10^#

發表於 12-9-22 11:01 |只看該作者

回復 EYUNG 的帖子

i agree we should follow the rules, but when we find some rules are not reasonable or out dated, we should sound out. That is what we are doing in the society, that's why we have legislative council, the polling day was just over for 2 weeks.

secondly, i want to repeat my point but more straight forward this time, the rule is stupid!!!OK? Percentage(%) should be considered instead of the numbers.

返回頂部

EYUNG

複式洋房

Rank: 3 Rank: 3


	462

11^#

發表於 12-9-22 11:54 |只看該作者

我會咁睇學校, 每間學校都有自己的辨學模式，大家有權選擇，不時都聽到有家長想改變學校迎合自已 (不只福附), 意見可反應, 但難強求。立法會都有不同政黨可選擇，也會選一個與自己理念相同的吧!
我都想知其他學校是怎樣釐定欠交功課，50%? 25%? long Q / short Q ? 計法一樣? 是這樣嗎?

點評

meimeima Some schools do not have any explicit principles. Only mark them on hand book. However, I believe it will affect students' conduct rating in school reports. 發表於 12-9-25 12:57

返回頂部

mandy304