用戶登入
用戶名稱:
密      碼:
搜索
教育王國 討論區 備戰大學 St Paul Co-ed Achieves Good Result in HKDSE Exam
樓主: hui916
go

St Paul Co-ed Achieves Good Result in HKDSE Exam   [複製鏈接]

Rank: 5Rank: 5


2094
81#
發表於 12-7-24 01:22 |只看該作者
simpleway 發表於 12-7-24 00:03
Kenfu,

Mr Anchan59 said something elsewhere remind me it's a waste of time to share anything meani ...
係,我建議EK轉直資,收5千元一個月會費才可發言,等只有“中產”家長才可負擔得起,水準就可提高,對不對!

點評

chaselam  或者將會員分類為正式會員及旁邊鶴會員有助提升發言水準  發表於 12-7-24 04:45

Rank: 2


44
82#
發表於 12-7-24 01:44 |只看該作者
DRYW 發表於 12-7-23 02:01
但需要填住址,父母的職業,是嗎?其實提供電郵地址,父母姓名,聯絡電話便可。 ...

對不起,本人不清楚是否所有直資的學校的申請表都是一樣,但據本人記憶所及,多年前本人確實填過職業資料,如無記錯錯,應改最起碼DGS 需要的,如有誤,請指正。


Rank: 2


44
83#
發表於 12-7-24 04:51 |只看該作者
kenfu 發表於 12-7-23 23:00
我都覺得無乜分別, 除左要俾錢之外.

e.g. 整体成績 - 一樣咁好; 家庭背景 - 有一半都是富戶; sports, art ...

還有的(不過又是離題),LSC, MCS 九華的學生可享有寬敞不錯的校園環境,又唔使錢享用,以香港現時的地價,是非常可貴的。


1377
84#
發表於 12-7-24 06:19 |只看該作者
提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽

Rank: 14Rank: 14Rank: 14Rank: 14


112827
85#
發表於 12-7-24 07:54 |只看該作者
lawsonmoon 發表於 12-7-24 00:48
其實我都想聽吓Anchan59係呢個thread發表吓立場,不過佢好似係隔離俾spcc fan插緊!
BTW, I was former dbs  ...
我答咗simpleway,佢可能quote錯咗。是否插則見人見智,退一步海闊天空!!
EK的真正目的是交換升學資訊及教育政策的平台,並非龍門陣。

我跟你唔同,我又唔係DB仔,又唔係辯論隊,自愧不如,見醜不如藏拙。自便啦。

God grant me the serenity
to accept the things I cannot change;
courage to change the things I can;
and wisdom to know the difference.

Rank: 5Rank: 5


2132
86#
發表於 12-7-24 13:29 |只看該作者
正如很多EK貼一般, 相信樓主為考生成績喝采吧, 不喜的家長何必在此傾注各自的仇富. 仇直資等的情懷(傷身呀!), 天大地大, 要追求無完美既學校. 制度. 社會, 實有賴各人先齊身, 方可治國, 平天下.

點評

88muimui  我絕不仇富. 仇直資, 相反其實係好羨慕可入讀的學生!   考生成績好, 當然值得喝采啦!  發表於 12-7-25 15:56
Shootastar  I agree with you in total.  發表於 12-7-24 14:17

Rank: 5Rank: 5


2094
87#
發表於 12-7-24 13:40 |只看該作者
lawsonmoon 發表於 12-7-23 19:32
錯哂啦,幫你咋。我對local課程冇興趣,我係想講spcc轉直資前和和後基本冇甚分别,why依家變左要俾幾千元學費 ...
Hi kym,As an old boy of DBS, it's embarassing to tell you that I admire La Salle more nowadays!

點評

peremum  Glad to see a honest guy who can admit the truth.  I like you, lawsonmoon  發表於 12-7-25 12:38
ANChan59  We don't bother who you are. We only bother your content and argument.....  發表於 12-7-24 19:13

Rank: 7Rank: 7Rank: 7


11688
88#
發表於 12-7-24 14:17 |只看該作者
回復 lawsonmoon 的帖子

Why do you have such a change? Can you share with us?

Rank: 5Rank: 5


2094
89#
發表於 12-7-24 14:50 |只看該作者
One-Mama 發表於 12-7-24 13:29
正如很多EK貼一般, 相信樓主為考生成績喝采吧, 不喜的家長何必在此傾注各自的仇富. 仇直資等的情懷(傷身呀! ...
㸃會傷身呀,係度講吓笑啫,唔駛咁認真。制度唔會因你改變,你亦不用遷就制度。最感恩自己還有選擇權,想替冇得選擇既人發吓聲啫。但係香港仲有很多人有小農思為,at least EK仲有,什麽你反對直資就係考唔到直資!!!!
以呢D人既思為就會話林超英反對母校縮班或轉直資一定係乜,乜,乜啦!

其實樓主唔係有心or無意係Day one post係“小一選校”,我亦冇機會睇到or comment!

Rank: 5Rank: 5


2094
90#
發表於 12-7-24 14:54 |只看該作者
本帖最後由 lawsonmoon 於 12-7-24 14:57 編輯
Shootastar 發表於 12-7-24 14:17
回復 lawsonmoon 的帖子

Why do you have such a change? Can you share with us?

同林超英既諗法相近,你亦可google吓 DBS當初既辦學目標係乜。很懷念“蝦餃”做校長既年代。R.I.P.

Rank: 7Rank: 7Rank: 7


11688
91#
發表於 12-7-24 15:00 |只看該作者
回復 lawsonmoon 的帖子

What is the current mission of DBS after its switch to DSS and IB school?

Rank: 2


44
92#
發表於 12-7-24 16:10 |只看該作者
本帖最後由 DRYW 於 12-7-24 17:19 編輯
One-Mama 發表於 12-7-24 13:29
正如很多EK貼一般, 相信樓主為考生成績喝采吧, 不喜的家長何必在此傾注各自的仇富. 仇直資等的情懷(傷身呀! ...

Although all people deserve freedom to express here, I believe the spirit of this forum is to encourage more discussions rather than to show off. The member who posted this subject may not have the intention to show off at the outset but I regret to say that I have such impression after reading certain responses. Probably, this subject would be better discussed in the SPCC thread if SPCC parents/students want to celebrate their good DSE results. I have no intention to discriminate millionaires, SPCC or other direct subsidy scheme schools. More importantly, I don’t know how to measure wealth because some people earning more than HK$1,000,000 a year may still consider they are poor. Families living in either private or public estates do not mean they are poor indeed. Nonetheless, I have a strong feeling that some parents in this forum, whose children are studying at those famous DSS,  take a superior attitude toward others. They are not willing to hear other criticism against DSS very often. Please remember that those opinions were expressed against DSS but not their children or their families.


9300
93#
發表於 12-7-25 02:32 |只看該作者
提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
簽名被屏蔽


1377
94#
發表於 12-7-25 08:31 |只看該作者
提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽

Rank: 5Rank: 5


2504
95#
發表於 12-7-25 12:36 |只看該作者
回復 lawsonmoon 的帖子

Your inability to distinguish between the different St. Paul's just show your ignorance.  SPCC has been the cream of cream of HK education for more than 60 years.  I personally heard a ex-Principal of a elite Band 1 Secondary school (she has been in education since 1960s) said that SPCC is considered among educators to be unique in her own class above all other schools.

Rank: 7Rank: 7Rank: 7


11688
96#
發表於 12-7-25 12:51 |只看該作者
回復 peremum 的帖子

peremum

Would you please let us know why SPCC is the cream of cream of Hong Kong education in terms of:

(a) public examination results - HKCUU, HKDSE or HKAL;

(b) the percentage of the graduation class admitted to the 8 local subsidised universities;

(c) annual music achievement amongst secondary schools in Hong Kong;

(d) annual sports achievement amongst secondary schools in Hong Kong; or

(e) any yardsticks you think suitable for comparison purposes.

Thank you.

點評

88muimui  我個人認為 "why SPCC is the cream of cream of Hong Kong education " ?   主因係佢收左d cream of cream students.  發表於 12-7-25 15:05

Rank: 7Rank: 7Rank: 7


11688
97#
發表於 12-7-25 12:53 |只看該作者
回復 peremum 的帖子

peremum

What makes SPCC unique amongst schools in Hong Kong according to the ex-principal of the elite band-1 school?

Rank: 5Rank: 5


2504
98#
發表於 12-7-25 14:55 |只看該作者
回復 Shootastar 的帖子

If you really know, I am happy to take this weekend to search for the outstanding history of SPCC.  It is a big project.  Please kindly allow me a few days.

點評

Shootastar  Yes, I really want to know. I am interested in studying different types of education systems as well as the schools in Hong Kong. Thanks.  發表於 12-7-25 15:13

Rank: 7Rank: 7Rank: 7


11688
99#
發表於 12-7-25 15:16 |只看該作者
88muimui

Even if SPCC has the cream of cream students, does it guarantee that it is a cream of cream of Hong Kong education?

Rank: 5Rank: 5


4564
100#
發表於 12-7-25 15:29 |只看該作者
本帖最後由 bobbycheung 於 12-7-25 15:43 編輯

I agree with 88muimui entirely.  The result of a school has a lot to do with its students' background.  To me, the achievement of a school such as 鮮魚行學校 is in no way less than those of any of the top local or IS schools in HK.

http://hk.news.yahoo.com/%E7%AA% ... 0%A1-224826799.html

Sometimes I wonder how well the top schools will fare if they exchange all their students with those of say 鮮魚行學校 whose students are handicapped by factors such as 連課外活動都負擔不起,還要面對家庭問題........

We need not be unduly proud of producing "cream of the cream" students.  Getting cream out of the cream is comparatively easy.  It's far more difficult to produce cream out of nothing.

點評

88muimui  I'm sorry to say that the main reason for the elite schools to switch to NSS is that  they don't want to be 'polluted' by the unqualified raw materials.  發表於 12-7-25 15:37
‹ 上一主題|下一主題