請問咁多間LH論小一派位及師資係咪青衣最好海逸較差?

sylviacc44

請問咁多間LH論小一派位及師資係咪青衣最好海逸較差?THX.

snowygary

can anyone compare KM , LH 's p1 allocation?i really want to know...

snowygary

if you see detail,they are different!!DIFFERENT STYLE OF PRIMARY SCHOOL.

elizatyy

原帖由 ha! 於 11-4-27 01:02 發表
For the P1 allocation, you can click to KM's website and do comparsion.  I do this 3-4 years before when i choose kindergarten.  I remember KM has more students to Ying Wah...others not have very sign ...

I cannot image how busy are the KM parents.

Christi

其實你上兩校的網頁自然一目了然

原帖由 snowygary 於 11-4-26 00:53 發表
can anyone compare KM , LH 's p1 allocation?i really want to know...

kc_01k

海逸校上年 開始轉新校長, 對升小一一定係有D關係架.  

(可能會有人唔想我咁講啦, 不過大家請自行判斷)

學之園係有打手喺呢度, 個人認為啦 (好多嘢講咗出黎都會比人ban)

[ 本帖最後由 kc_01k 於 11-5-11 17:05 編輯 ]

kitmantsoi

compare 個placement result
HL 比 LV 多4個student, offer 多7個, result 同LV好接近 wor.

原帖由 kc_01k 於 11-5-11 16:49 發表
海逸校上年 開始轉新校長, 對升小一一定係有D關係架.  

(可能會有人唔想我咁講啦, 不過大家請自行判斷)

學之園係有打手喺呢度, 個人認為啦 (好多嘢講咗出黎都會比人ban) ...

kc_01k

原帖由 kitmantsoi 於 11-5-17 17:18 發表
compare 個placement result
HL 比 LV 多4個student, offer 多7個, result 同LV好接近 wor.

有d嘢, 唔係淨係睇result, 我地家長研究過, 某d學校, LV學之園根本連1個小朋友嘅 2nd IN 都無機會.  而青衣就一收收十幾個.  呢d就係我地考咗小學嘅LH家長就知.  其實兩間學校, 小朋友資質唔會真係差得咁遠.   

其實某D學校, 真係需要校長去打好關係囉.

huba

During a casual conversation (not in the PTA meeting and I'm not a PTA member) with the school's management, I did mention about this and got the below understanding:

There is only one school management team for LHK which is comprised of all campuses' principals & ... etc. Firstly, the principals' influencing power is not as big as some parents thought. Secondly, if any principal is going to apply personal influence, it must be informed to the management team. Thirdly, this way of influencing the result for just one campus is not good for LHK generally so it's not something they would choose to do.

Personally, I believe the third point above.

Just for sharing, I also got the below info. from the above mentioned conversation.

1. In average, VE campus' parents applied more schools for their kids than LV campus' parents. The ratio is about 5:3.

2. VE campus students have a higher ratio of Big boys/girls than LV campus. Some outstanding kids applied more than 8 schools that have pushed up the no. of offers a lot.

原帖由 kc_01k 於 18/5/2011 14:21 發表
...
其實某D學校, 真係需要校長去打好關係囉.  

[ 本帖最後由 huba 於 11-5-18 19:53 編輯 ]

elizatyy

原帖由 huba 於 11-5-18 17:50 發表
During a casual conversation (not in the PTA meeting and I'm not a PTA member) with the school's management, I did mention about this and got the below understanding:

There is only one school managem ...

I guess another reason is most of the LV parents are living in KLN city / Whampoa area and the school net is comparable.

calbee6

Pls check pm.           

原帖由 kc_01k 於 11-5-18 14:21 發表


有d嘢, 唔係淨係睇result, 我地家長研究過, 某d學校, LV學之園根本連1個小朋友嘅 2nd IN 都無機會.  而青衣就一收收十幾個.  呢d就係我地考咗小學嘅LH家長就知.  其實兩間學校, 小朋友資質唔會真係差得咁遠.   

...

elizatyy

Latest results has been posted on LHK website.

http://www.learninghabitat.org/en/about_us/about01.htm

macymary

會唔會係青衣收生人數比較少（聽講ＬＨ青衣班數比其他分校少，如果錯請糾正我），所以比例上大仔／較醒目的學生較多？不知有沒有關係？

huba

回復 macymary 的帖子

The competition to get a seat in LHK(VE) is the most fierce among all LHK branches. Due to the strong competition, they basically only admit the big babies who in average performs better than small babies. Besides, they imposed stronger discipline compared with LHK(LV).

The above is my understanding for the past differences. Lately, I know LHK(LV) has also changed to admit big babies only. Besides, both disciplines and academic expectation have been raised in LHK(LV). Say, the Japanese students' Chinese academic performance has been accommodated by the teachers before. Now, the teachers will call the Japanese mothers to work together to improve their children's Chinese too.