- 在線時間
- 0 小時
- 最後登錄
- 11-4-5
- 國民生產力
- 0
- 附加生產力
- 0
- 貢獻生產力
- 0
- 註冊時間
- 11-3-31
- 閱讀權限
- 10
- 帖子
- 5
- 主題
- 0
- 精華
- 0
- 積分
- 5
- UID
- 722285
|
i do really agree with you, it's unfair to compare which is good or bad. i do not agree St Paul is much better than UCCK, pls take a look at their results of HKCEE of 2010. also their principals, the one from UCCK'd show more consideration for their students, the other one from St Paul'd just care for how to keep a fine reputation of school.原帖由 sumheima 於 11-3-31 14:43 發表
一間是數十年的老校,另一間是2003年才開始的新校,若從名氣,校友網絡等比較,我想是有欠公平.
從另一方面看,St Paul boy這幾年的成績口碑平平,相反匯基2010的HKCEE成績好像不錯(6科14分佔51%)!
兩間應是煥然不同的 ... |
|