細b真的跟不上嗎?有無過來人分享下)

twinsstar1

This is what my kid is facing now too (Dec kid)-- not very good at his fine motor skills , thus hate writing a lot. However, he's good at other areas. If he was born in Oct / Nov, I might not struggle a lot whether to repeat him or not but now, he's a Dec kid.....so ... really difficult to make the decision!

原帖由 agugi 於 11-3-12 14:56 發表
我囡07年10月尾, 左思右想下, 沒有比佢做大女, 因覺大人家太多, 她又長得成熟高太, 怕她有hard feeling, 所以現讀K1.

so far佢學嘢快, 講嘅好叻, 學習全無問題。但似乎小肌肉未係好ready.
所以最近開始寫字就吃力小 ...

[ 本帖最後由 twinsstar1 於 11-3-13 18:21 編輯 ]

YY233

If your kid born in DEC and you feel a little bit uncomfortable, just let him repeat K1. Next year try to apply PC, perhaps it is good for him. Let it go and don't think too much!

twinsstar1

My kid is in k2 now. So if he has to repeat, I'd let him repeat k3. Yes .. may be you're right. May be I just need to follow my heart and not to think too much :)

原帖由 YY233 於 11-3-13 21:39 發表
If your kid born in DEC and you feel a little bit uncomfortable, just let him repeat K1. Next year try to apply PC, perhaps it is good for him. Let it go and don't think too much!

MCLF120

我囝囝係12月尾細B,而家續K3,完全無跟唔上喎,成績重非常好,如果只計吸收能力就真係無問題,N1,K1上學期時重有D擔心,因為小肌肉未READY真係有小小分別,但只要你耐心訓練,都K1下學期左右吧,已經沒多大分別,我本人覺得最大分別可能係怕生保,怕羞LAW,唔夠成熟(這未必關大,細B問題,係本身性格問題),所以無一間直資,私校收,雖然佢無學校收,但我而家反而一D都唔擔心喎,只要KEEP都佢好成績,P2,P3都可以插班啦,唔好睇小自已小朋友,本人應為如小朋友跟得上,無必要浪費佢一年時間呀,如細B跟得上,比大B還好,佢會好有自信的.

twinsstar1

that's why sometimes I think it is the schools who prefer to take in Big B instead of small B even when they have the same performance.

原帖由 MCLF120 於 11-3-17 18:48 發表
我囝囝係12月尾細B,而家續K3,完全無跟唔上喎,成績重非常好,如果只計吸收能力就真係無問題,N1,K1上學期時重有D擔心,因為小肌肉未READY真係有小小分別,但只要你耐心訓練,都K1下學期左右吧,已經沒多大分別,我本人覺得最 ...

MCLF120

原帖由 twinsstar1 於 11-3-13 18:14 發表
I do believe the difference between big and small B  is obvious in KG and P.1-2 level only. The gap will narrow down when they grow older. However, the problem is, even if the small B and parents are  ...

Are you sure you make your kid as big B,they can get into famous private and DSS schools, I am not sure, so I make my kid as small B and try again on P2, P3

twinsstar1

of cos not sure ... and in fact I'm still stuggling. that's why i've planned to apply P1 in K3 ... if failed, then repeat K3 and try again next year.
Another reason that I want him to be a big kid cos I don't want him to have a hard time in studying in P.1-2. Just afraid that if he can't catch up then he will have no interest in learning later.  

原帖由 MCLF120 於 11-3-18 14:11 發表



Are you sure you make your kid as big B,they can get into famous private and DSS schools, I am not sure, so I make my kid as small B and try again on P2, P3

[ 本帖最後由 twinsstar1 於 11-3-18 14:45 編輯 ]

MCLF120

原帖由 YY233 於 11-3-12 23:13 發表
I believe that it is true!! My friend is a teacher of a famous primary school. Most of the teachers have higher expectation on the big children. Sometimes the parents ask them why their big  ...

yes, if a small kid get a higher achievement, most of the teacher was surprised!

hagupit

做大b都唔一定好，有同事個囡repeat k1，考到協幼，小學上唔到協小，就去左九龍塘區某小學，但校內成績只係下。repeat嗰年係浪費。

我覺得細b唔一定差, 大b都唔一定好。

Sumyeema1

我傾向讓小朋友做大仔。

各位請原諒我拋一下書包， 看過一本書 [Outliers: The Story of Success]，作者嘗試破解成功到底有哪些因素。

作者一開波，就列出加拿大最 Top 曲棍球球員的出生日期， 結果發現大部分球員都是年頭生日， 為什麼呢？

（太懶打字, below copy from Wikipedia):

The book begins with Gladwell's research on why a disproportionate number of elite Canadian hockey players are born in the first few months of the calendar year. The answer, he points out, is that since youth hockey leagues determine eligibility by calendar year, children born on January 1 play in the same league as those born on December 31 in the same year. Because children born earlier in the year are bigger and maturer than their younger competitors, they are often identified as better athletes, leading to extra coaching and a higher likelihood of being selected for elite hockey leagues. This phenomenon is dubbed "accumulative advantage" by Gladwell, Outliers asserts that success depends on the idiosyncrasies of the selection process used to identify talent just as much as it does on the athletes' natural abilities.

各位家有細B 的家長，你們可能覺得‘accumulative advantage' 不能套用在學習上，以上提供另一個角度讓你們參考。

catiou627

朋友跟我說的話，讓我做了決定，讓女兒做大Ｂ。她說：＂如果12月出世, 點解唔做大Ｂ，浪費一年？　佢只不過遲一年出黎搵錢啫？＂
做大Ｂ，希望佢開個頭開得好Ｄ，讀書有興趣Ｄ，自信Ｄ。

twinsstar1

It is true that after repeating, it won't make a kid be the top ones in class. In fact, I think the difference between small B and big B would narrow down when they grow older. But for the case of your colleague, may be if her daughter did not repeat, the results would be even worse (I mean in p.1-2)

Of course, we would never know whether repeating or not is good to a child as no child can experience both choices. I've been thinking back and forth about the issue too .. haha .. crazy me!  

quote]原帖由 hagupit 於 11-3-18 16:18 發表
做大b都唔一定好，有同事個囡repeat k1，考到協幼，小學上唔到協小，就去左九龍塘區某小學，但校內成績只係下。repeat嗰年係浪費。

我覺得細b唔一定差, 大b都唔一定好。 ... [/quote]

InitialD

<做大b都唔一定好，有同事個囡repeat k1，考到協幼，小學上唔到協小，就去左九龍塘區某小學，但校內成績只係下。repeat嗰年係浪費。>
If he/she is not a 大b, he/she will be even worst. His/her parent has made the right choice...

I like Sumyeema1 posting. In addiitonal. the best one is always the best one and it is not easy for small B to catch up the other with extra effort. Think, if 大b and small b ahve same IQ and make the same effort, the small b  lost the confident as they do not perform as good as their peer.Of course there are some exceptional...

原帖由 hagupit 於 11-3-18 16:18 發表
做大b都唔一定好，有同事個囡repeat k1，考到協幼，小學上唔到協小，就去左九龍塘區某小學，但校內成績只係下。repeat嗰年係浪費。

我覺得細b唔一定差, 大b都唔一定好。 ...

[ 本帖最後由 InitialD 於 11-4-7 20:44 編輯 ]

InitialD

I think "label" is not exist in most school. The school always pick up the best one (no matter is big or small B). I heard that a popular school (snoopy principal) picked up a Dec B with IQ of 180 this year (subjected to be confirmed).

原帖由 ting-ma 於 11-4-8 10:28 發表


我都相信你bb 係outstanding ge..但有冇想過細b會比人label? i mean C私/直資?? Even 一個細b & 一個大b interview performance the same, 我都會覺得teacher 會select 個大b....(純粹個人意見). 因為d 人有bias.. ...