蘇浙 vs 柴灣聖米迦勒

Sorb

Starting from this year, the school will not publize the result in web.....I learnt they do this based on the advice from EDB. I know the 2010's result is slightly better than 2009.  So, you just make reference to 2009 lah.

ANChan59

原帖由 Sorb 於 11-1-6 14:11 發表
Starting from this year, the school will not publize the result in web.....I learnt they do this based on the advice from EDB. I know the 2010's result is slightly better than 2009.  So, you just make ...

Any quoted source of your statement. NPMPS and SMS(NP)..... still publized in the web, it's a right thing to do.

EDB is crazy, blind leads the blind...... unfair to users - students and parents......

ANChan59

原帖由 Go-to-school 於 11-1-6 14:55 發表
Thanks Sorb
教局甘搞法令資訊透明度大减,對一眾家長選校無好處.只令大家更烏下烏下,估下估下,甘選校

May be this is their intention.

Sorb

I just hearsay only....I don't know if it is really the advice from EDB.

If it is really an advice/suggestion from EDB, as long as it is not rule, you can choose to follow or not, this is why some schools still prefer to give the public transparency law.  So, we should give "clap" to those schools.

ANChan59

I understand your point.

I also know some schools won't disclose the results because their results declined as the rule of game changed in the last few years. The weighing factor is changed every year according to TSA results.

Like NPMPS, their results dropped a bit due to the new weighing factors over years. Transparency is our concerns.

Sorb

At first when I learnt KCS would not publize its 2010 allocation result on web.  My 1st thinking is the result must have dropped/declined in 2010, so, not willing to disclose publicely law.  But I later found out it is actually slighly better than 2009 .....so, that is why I suggest you guys to make reference to 2009 for 2010 result law.

ANChan59

Agreed.

Now. using moving average TSA results as weighing factor, the 2009 result can be a good reference for 2010 & 2011. Of course, the relevance will be declined according to time.

GIPW

原帖由 Sorb 於 11-1-6 17:45 發表
At first when I learnt KCS would not publize its 2010 allocation result on web.  My 1st thinking is the result must have dropped/declined in 2010, so, not willing to disclose publicely law.  But I lat ...

Yes that is my thought too so when I know the actual result then I am relieve.  

But I can't comment on St Michael as I have no idea about this school

GIPW

原帖由 Go-to-school 於 11-1-7 15:55 發表
甘即係蘇小只向學生家長公布派位成績,

敢問係張貼出黎或只口頭公佈予個別查旬的蘇小家長?如果兩樣都唔係,甘你地從何得知?

HI
They will only post it in the internal office and parents are welcome to check with them.   So this is more like this approach (口頭公佈予個別查旬的蘇小家長)  I checked and memorized them.  

Sorb

No no GIPW, should be 張貼出黎公佈予個別查旬的蘇小家長, but parents cannot copy, testing the parents' memory : )

原帖由 GIPW 於 11-1-8 00:40 發表


HI
They will only post it in the internal office and parents are welcome to check with them.   So this is more like this approach (口頭公佈予個別查旬的蘇小家長)  I checked and memorized them.  :qui ...

stseng

We do not need to memorize it.  If they post the list in the office and let us go in to check it out, then we should just bring a pen and a paper with us and copy the list manually.

原帖由 Sorb 於 11-1-8 10:11 發表
No no GIPW, should be 張貼出黎公佈予個別查旬的蘇小家長, but parents cannot copy, testing the parents' memory : )

ANChan59

原帖由 stseng 於 11-1-10 21:13 發表
We do not need to memorize it.  If they post the list in the office and let us go in to check it out, then we should just bring a pen and a paper with us and copy the list manually.

A suggestion, use the camera of your mobile phone.

stseng

yes - use a camera!!!

GIPW

I know.  But the as I said I am not supposed to take picture or photocopy so the only thing I could do is to memorize the top few schools.  

The principal they have signed the agreement with the education department that they will no longer post the result on the web - I do not like this idea at all.  Why they education dept deprive the right for us to know the allocation of the school ?

ANChan59

權力使人腐化.........
愚民政策...............