- 在線時間
- 131 小時
- 最後登錄
- 11-1-11
- 國民生產力
- 74
- 附加生產力
- 1
- 貢獻生產力
- 0
- 註冊時間
- 06-6-18
- 閱讀權限
- 10
- 帖子
- 193
- 主題
- 4
- 精華
- 0
- 積分
- 268
- UID
- 88058
|
my son studied in Think (LC) for N1, till now (he is in SC K1 now) he is always mention about Think, his N1 teachers, school bus EE etc, (though he hv been crying over one month when start N1.. ha ha). Think provide diff activities for kids, and provide good sharing chance with parents like give VCD which record kids' activities etc. I think that is quite good and make the study more interesting. And the size of the school is not so big is another advantage.
We change to SC due to its name like many parents here, to compare, Think (N1) hv more activities than SC (K1), (may be SC is a bit too big so diff to arrange a school wide activities for every kids. )
I am contacting with some Think K2/K3 kids, most of them are studying in Full Time Mode (morning Main Stream, Afternoon International Stream), that is quite a unique and good arrangement for kinder kids if parents plans to let them to study in full time mode, their explosure will be better than the normal kinder's full day student. However, the cost is high too.
Academically, as my Kid only study in K1, I do think SC and Think are quite similar level in Chinese / Math so far. Buy my son study in SC's PTH/ENG class, so is better in PTH ability. Both SC / Think are not as pushing as other famous kinder like KV / KM / HKPS, specailly in writing and reading. So we hv to put extra effort if want to hv kids start to read/ write earlier. SC and Think are both working more on presentation practice and language ability. But other SC parents told me fm K2/K3, SC will be a bit difficult to match with primary's requirment. For Think, that arrangement is not so obvious, and some Think's kids who study in international stream, they might left for primary after K2. |
|