用戶登入
用戶名稱:
密      碼:
搜索
教育王國 討論區 備戰大學 中三要揀科啦 - 舊年揀咗科比D意見
發新帖
查看: 4135|回覆: 14
go

中三要揀科啦 - 舊年揀咗科比D意見

Rank: 4


550
發表於 10-1-23 16:43 |顯示全部帖子
真係完全唔知點揀, 希望舊年揀咗科比D意見? 大家交流吓?

Rank: 5Rank: 5


1611
發表於 10-1-25 19:25 |顯示全部帖子
based on your children's interest and academic result is the most important thing.

Rank: 3Rank: 3


248
發表於 10-2-23 14:08 |顯示全部帖子
如果佢對兩科興趣都差唔多,咁選邊科好呢?

phy + chem + bio + M2 or
phy + chem + econ + M2


原帖由 lk362 於 10-1-25 19:25 發表
based on your children's interest and academic result is the most important thing.

Rank: 5Rank: 5

醒目開學勳章


4191
發表於 10-2-23 16:20 |顯示全部帖子
如果將來會讀例如醫療,藥劑,護理等就可考慮 Bio,
否則的話可不揀.


235
發表於 10-2-24 09:08 |顯示全部帖子

回覆 4# fanny4 的文章

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9


20633
發表於 10-2-24 12:12 |顯示全部帖子
原帖由 qooboy 於 10-2-24 09:08 發表
如讀 Combined Science 是否辛苦市過
讀科 Phy, Chem, Bio??  如考大學時,
Combined Science 成績是否次選?


Combined Sci 應該係每科讀 50% =/= 單獨讀某一科的份量

Rank: 3Rank: 3


248
發表於 10-2-24 14:17 |顯示全部帖子
Combined Sci 的範圍應該係單獨一科 >50%,所以我覺得會辛苦過讀單一科 Sci.



原帖由 2bzmummy 於 10-2-24 12:12 發表


Combined Sci 應該係每科讀 50% =/= 單獨讀某一科的份量

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9


20633
發表於 10-2-24 16:59 |顯示全部帖子
原帖由 蘇太 於 10-2-24 14:17 發表
Combined Sci 的範圍應該係單獨一科 >50%,所以我覺得會辛苦過讀單一科 Sci.


按照小朋友學校老師解釋,應該大概每科一半左右

Rank: 3Rank: 3


248
發表於 10-2-25 09:04 |顯示全部帖子
我就認為 >50%,以 Biology Syllabuses 為例,有 '*' 的 topic 是 Combined Sci 的範圍,單一科 Bio 的 compulsory part 總數是 200 hours,只有 IV. Health and Diseases (c. Body defence mechanisms) 這個 topic 不在 combined sci 的範圍內,但就唔知道會否內容少 D 呢?
以我所知,高考有分 AL 同 AS,兩科 AS 可等同一科 AL 計,但就肯定 2 個AS多過 1個 AL。


NSS Curriculum
Subject : __Biology___

Scientific Investigations (20 hours)

Compulsory Part (200 hours)
I. Cells and Molecules of Life (46 hours)
    a. Molecules of life*∗
    b. Cellular organisation*
    c. Movement of substances across membrane*
    d. Cell cycle and division*
    e. Cellular energetics*
II. Genetics and Evolution (42 hours)
    a. Basic genetics*
    b. Molecular genetics*
    c. Biodiversity and evolution*
III. Organisms and Environment (86 hours)
    a. Essential life processes in plants*
    b. Essential life processes in animals*
    c. Reproduction, growth and development*
    d. Coordination and response *
    e. Homeostasis*
    f. Ecosystems*
IV. Health and Diseases (26 hours)
    a. Personal health*
    b. Diseases*
    c. Body defence mechanisms

∗ * It is proposed that these topics be included in the biology part of Science (Physics, Biology) and Science (Biology, Chemistry).

Elective Part (50 hours, any 2 out of 4)
V. Human Physiology: Regulation and Control (25 hours)
    a. Regulation of water content (osmoregulation)
    b. Regulation of body temperature
    c. Regulation of gas content in blood
    d. Hormonal control of reproductive cycle
VI. Applied Ecology (25 hours)
    a. Human impact on the environment
    b. Pollution control
    c. Conservation
    d. Sustainable development
VII. Microorganisms and Humans (25 hours)
    a. Microbiology
    b. Use of microorganisms
    c. Microbial genetics
    d. Harmful effects of microorganisms
VIII. Biotechnology (25 hours)
    a. Introduction to biotechnology
    b. Techniques in modern biotechnology
    c. Biotechnology in medicine
    d. Biotechnology in agriculture
    e. Bioethics

Total lesson time: 270 hours

原帖由 2bzmummy 於 10-2-24 16:59 發表


按照小朋友學校老師解釋,應該大概每科一半左右

Rank: 5Rank: 5


2635
發表於 10-2-25 16:52 |顯示全部帖子
原帖由 蘇太 於 10-2-25 09:04 發表
我就認為 >50%,以 Biology Syllabuses 為例,有 '*' 的 topic 是 Combined Sci 的範圍,單一科 Bio 的 compulsory part 總數是 200 hours,只有 IV. Health and Diseases (c. Body defence mechanisms) 這個 topic 不在 com ...


I ve discussed the issue with my husband who is teaching in one of those so-called "elite-traditional" schools.

He opined that in terms of quantity, it's >50%. thus for kids having three electives on top of Chi, Eng, Math, LS, taking combined science may not be too "hea".

But my fd who's teaching the same subject in a band 3 school advised that for his students taking 2 electives only, combined science is a gd choice, providing more options to the kids. and he opined that in terms of difficulty, it's just ~to HKCEE+ a little bit more. so, should not be difficult.

[ 本帖最後由 bakusensei 於 10-2-25 16:58 編輯 ]

Rank: 5Rank: 5


2635
發表於 10-2-25 16:57 |顯示全部帖子
原帖由 qooboy 於 10-2-24 09:08 發表
Combined Science 成績是否次選?


not sure. but u may make ref. on the req. announced last yr (may be revised later) on the req. of specific majors:

http://334.edb.hkedcity.net/doc/chi/University_entrance_requirements_Chi_v1.pdf

e.g. CU pharmacy needs students taking Chem but not combined science

Rank: 3Rank: 3


248
發表於 10-2-26 09:21 |顯示全部帖子
同意如果只修兩科,選 combined sci 對將來選科有利,但若選修三科,則覺得比較辛苦。

bakusensei,

傳統名校會否比有能力的學生多選一科?類似以前會考可以考 10 科。

我理解,現在最多可以: 中、英、數、通識、音樂/視覺藝術/體育/宗教,再加 3 個選修科,即 8 科,如果比修多一科自修,就可以考 9 科(數學延伸不計 1 科)。因為我聽一個朋友說,話上年 (現在 F.4)佢個女學校有同學選 phy+chem+bio+econ。你 husband 間學校可以嗎?



原帖由 bakusensei 於 10-2-25 16:52 發表


I ve discussed the issue with my husband who is teaching in one of those so-called "elite-traditional" schools.

He opined that in terms of quantity, it's >50%. thus for kids having three electives ...

[ 本帖最後由 蘇太 於 10-2-26 09:42 編輯 ]

Rank: 5Rank: 5


2635
發表於 10-2-26 14:24 |顯示全部帖子
原帖由 蘇太 於 10-2-26 09:21 發表
同意如果只修兩科,選 combined sci 對將來選科有利,但若選修三科,則覺得比較辛苦。

bakusensei,

傳統名校會否比有能力的學生多選一科?類似以前會考可以考 10 科。

我理解,現在最多可以: 中、英、數、通識、音樂/視覺藝 ...


didn't hear about this. so i guess not.

actually, the timetable to accomodate 3 electives is already a little bit tight. I guess schools allowing 4 electives may need to arrange the 4th one being conducted in separate sessions after school. otherwise, if not much students taking the 4th subject, the majority will ve additional free time while sacrifying the other subjects taken.

Rank: 1


26
發表於 10-3-1 18:51 |顯示全部帖子
我想為小女友選 BA + Comb Sci (Bio+Chem)
但不知應否選修數學(單元一或二),因有朋友告訴我將來的成績不是MATHS一個grade,M1/2一個 grade,是會
將Maths + M1/2 = (一個grade), 就好似Paper 1 & 2 咁,我擔心M1/2會拖低數學的分數。

有什麼意見???


235
發表於 10-3-2 09:18 |顯示全部帖子

回覆 14# cnine360 的文章

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽