用戶登入
用戶名稱:
密      碼:
搜索
教育王國 討論區 幼校討論 學之園(英普)vs維記(英普), 你會點揀?
發新帖
查看: 2882|回覆: 17
go

學之園(英普)vs維記(英普), 你會點揀? [複製鏈接]

Rank: 3Rank: 3


233
1#
發表於 09-11-27 23:39 |只看該作者 |倒序瀏覽 |打印
阿仔現在讀緊維記pn,剛收到學之園的offer,同樣都是下午英普班,我只知這兩間教學方式差不多,請問有無人知道邊間升小一考直資或私校會好d呀?

謝謝俾意見!!
   0    0    0    0


Rank: 5Rank: 5


4012
2#
發表於 09-11-28 08:01 |只看該作者
which branch of Vic & LH? I think hardware (campus) of Vic is more attractive while teachers may be LH? as they have more NET and PTH teachers. I also like principle(s) of LH more.
原帖由 nicoleli28 於 09-11-27 23:39 發表
阿仔現在讀緊維記pn,剛收到學之園的offer,同樣都是下午英普班,我只知這兩間教學方式差不多,請問有無人知道邊間升小一考直資或私校會好d呀?

謝謝俾意見!! ...

Rank: 3Rank: 3


233
3#
發表於 09-11-28 08:50 |只看該作者
阿仔讀緊何文田維記, 收到OFFER係LH海逸校呀~

多謝你的意見!!



原帖由 eggmama 於 09-11-28 08:01 發表
which branch of Vic & LH? I think hardware (campus) of Vic is more attractive while teachers may be LH? as they have more NET and PTH teachers. I also like principle(s) of LH more.


Rank: 5Rank: 5


4012
4#
發表於 09-11-28 08:56 |只看該作者
HMT Vic is IB while LH (HL)  would be more suitable for local stream? Am I right?
原帖由 nicoleli28 於 09-11-28 08:50 發表
阿仔讀緊何文田維記, 收到OFFER係LH海逸校呀~

多謝你的意見!!

Rank: 3Rank: 3


233
5#
發表於 09-11-28 09:12 |只看該作者
維記係行IB架,之前聽人講維記內容淺D,因為佢著重訓練思考探索,LH內容教得深d(其實我唔知係咪真),但我又見兩間的小學派位都好似差唔多,所以真係唔識揀....


原帖由 eggmama 於 09-11-28 08:56 發表
HMT Vic is IB while LH (HL)  would be more suitable for local stream? Am I right?


Rank: 5Rank: 5


4012
6#
發表於 09-11-28 10:49 |只看該作者
Did you apply SC or HKPS (英普) as well? Consider later when the result comes out.

Rank: 6Rank: 6


8048
7#
發表於 09-11-28 15:52 |只看該作者
原帖由 nicoleli28 於 09-11-28 09:12 發表
維記係行IB架,之前聽人講維記內容淺D,因為佢著重訓練思考探索,LH內容教得深d(其實我唔知係咪真),但我又見兩間的小學派位都好似差唔多,所以真係唔識揀....


...


I think both (維記 & LHK) are quite similar in terms of teaching methods and P1 allocation.  I know some LHK PN students have chosen 維記 for K1 last year.

Rank: 3Rank: 3


233
8#
發表於 09-12-18 12:31 |只看該作者
請問仲有無媽媽可以俾d意見? 因為1月份LH要交留位費了....


Rank: 5Rank: 5


1177
9#
發表於 09-12-20 23:54 |只看該作者
My girl studied the playgroups in both Victoria and LH before & gained their offers for PN last year and we finally picked Victoria base on the below reasons:

Hygience - Victoria is more concern about their hygience level while LH didn't perform this very well...

Resources - Victoria provide better resources in both manpower and facilities, eg ratio for teachers, amah and nurse... more spacious classroom and playground.

Teacher background - Victoria teachers are much well-educate.  Although they may not hire the net teacher as the English teacher, they concern their relevant education background rather than their race (but definitely a native teacher) ... LH emphasis they hire the net teacher as the English teacher, but most of them are not well educated or they don't have a heart to teach/love children...  

Hope my opinion can
help...

[ 本帖最後由 hihicathk 於 09-12-20 23:56 編輯 ]

Rank: 3Rank: 3


292
10#
發表於 09-12-21 12:27 |只看該作者
For me, I prefer LH cos my kid is studying N1 in LH. The teachers are really caring.

Few months ago, I was also accepted by LH and Victoria. My kid also attended the playgroup. I feel Victoria has an attractive environment but it seems too commercial.  Finally, we chosen LH and I still believe I chose a right school for my kid.

Rank: 3Rank: 3


238
11#
發表於 09-12-21 12:49 |只看該作者
維記行IB, 遲d銜接傳統小學可能會有困難, 家長要幫手補課, 反而學之園無這問題, 俾我會選LH.

Rank: 3Rank: 3


233
12#
發表於 09-12-21 13:55 |只看該作者

回覆 9# yin725 的文章

Hi yin725媽媽:

請問你小朋友依家讀緊N1,除左LH老師細心之外,仲有咩令係覺得揀LH會好D呀 ? 可否分享多些有關LH的優勝之處?
唔該哂你呀~


Rank: 3Rank: 3


412
13#
發表於 09-12-22 14:38 |只看該作者
according to the placement result of LH, I think LH got more students enter into int'l school compare with Victoria.  LH is not really target to the traditional primary schools too.  Agreed the points that hihiKathk mentioned.... I vote for Victoria.

Rank: 2


61
14#
發表於 09-12-22 20:35 |只看該作者
如學校行IB, 在教學上有乜唔同呢?

原帖由 shootingstar 於 09-12-21 12:49 發表
維記行IB, 遲d銜接傳統小學可能會有困難, 家長要幫手補課, 反而學之園無這問題, 俾我會選LH.

Rank: 3Rank: 3


264
15#
發表於 09-12-22 21:10 |只看該作者
銜接小學好d我會選學之園LH

Rank: 6Rank: 6


8048
16#
發表於 09-12-22 22:17 |只看該作者
原帖由 granddelsol 於 09-12-22 14:38 發表
according to the placement result of LH, I think LH got more students enter into int'l school compare with Victoria.  LH is not really target to the traditional primary schools too.  Agreed the points ...


A high ratio of LHK students have been admitted to DSS / private schools (include those new schools or traditional elite schools).  But it is also true that not many of them go to elite gov't schools.

Rank: 5Rank: 5


1177
17#
發表於 09-12-25 00:08 |只看該作者
始終LH 同VIC 0既 學生都唔係主打走津貼學校, 佢0地兩間都講明唔會因為有資助而去行學卷制...

而呢個都係佢0地0既SELLING POINT..

但係可以講0既係兩間都係好0既學校.但lh0黎講應該係海逸同青衣分校會好0的. 因為都係同一個校長去manage...

Rank: 3Rank: 3


256
18#
發表於 10-1-6 14:22 |只看該作者
Not all Victoria follows IB system, but yes, HMT does.  Two more issues you can consider:
1.  I think Victoria is slightly more expensive.
2.  What primary school their kids go to I think also depends on the parents preference.  Victoria has its own primary school, so I think many would prefer its own primary school, or the same rank/tier of international and ESF schools.  My impression is that LH parents are more local oriented, so they would apply local DSS/private schools.
‹ 上一主題|下一主題