用戶登入
用戶名稱:
密      碼:
搜索
教育王國 討論區 資優教育 很好的資優教育的文章
發新帖
查看: 4543|回覆: 9
go

很好的資優教育的文章 [複製鏈接]

Rank: 4


624
1#
發表於 09-8-21 18:03 |只看該作者 |倒序瀏覽 |打印
http://www.heryin.com/mono_2005-1.htm#2005-1-1

http://www.ntnu.edu.tw/spc/kuo/chisese/sub/2/2_2_data/12/123.pdf

值的一看再看.

[ 本帖最後由 小新媽媽 於 09-8-21 18:08 編輯 ]
   5    0    0    0
[url=http://www.TickerFactory.com/]

Rank: 3Rank: 3


460
2#
發表於 09-8-24 19:05 |只看該作者
萬分感激!

Rank: 2


40
3#
發表於 09-8-25 00:12 |只看該作者


Thank you!

Rank: 1


23
4#
發表於 09-9-8 11:38 |只看該作者
Thank you for your sharing

Rank: 3Rank: 3


126
5#
發表於 09-9-14 00:03 |只看該作者
Excuse me for being "simple and naive". According to the second article (the longer one), questions on the following items of the said article,

For item 2, "imbalance/ difference in maturity and actual age", would it help if we let the gifted child play with other kids ( to satisfy his emotional and social needs) but parents play the role of soul mate/ therapists, ie explore the deeper meanings of life with the child and satisfy the child's more mature intellectual mind?

For item 3, "awareness of difference with other children", will it help if the gifted child goes to a more advance school, so other kids there are likely of a higher calibre and v likely gifted themselves, so there is "less difference"?

For item 5, "high expectations of parents on a gifted child", maybe we should not test the child for giftedness anyway, similar to one of the control groups in the article, and without the baggage of giftedness, they'll cope better?

Would the above "simple solutions" help? Anyone has first hand experience pls?

[ 本帖最後由 cemily 於 09-9-14 00:04 編輯 ]


12651
6#
發表於 10-11-9 19:27 |只看該作者
提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽

Rank: 3Rank: 3


380
7#
發表於 10-11-10 15:46 |只看該作者
thx for sharing


750
8#
發表於 10-11-10 15:47 |只看該作者
提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽


9300
9#
發表於 10-11-30 15:37 |只看該作者
提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽

Rank: 4


561
10#
發表於 11-2-27 15:45 |只看該作者
這裡有很多關於資優兒童的文章,希望適合大家
http://hkage.org.hk/b5/pz_articles.html
‹ 上一主題|下一主題