用戶登入
用戶名稱:
密      碼:
搜索
教育王國 討論區 國際學校 GSIS - relocating??
查看: 3475|回覆: 47
go

GSIS - relocating??

Rank: 3Rank: 3


142
發表於 09-3-16 17:24 |顯示全部帖子
Can anyone confirm that GSIS is relocating to MOS next year?


686
發表於 09-3-16 17:37 |顯示全部帖子
提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽

Rank: 4


684
發表於 09-3-16 21:09 |顯示全部帖子
原帖由 wisekid2007 於 09-3-16 17:37 發表
GSIS's Board plans to decant (not permanently relocating) middle and upper primary students to MOS for a few years for redevelopment of the Peak Campus.  However, the plan was voted down by the parent ...


i see long posts in the Geokids forum, and the topic of GSIS is always on top, many parents complained. Some said even parents vote down, the GSIS board has approved already, and signed contract with the school in MOS (some said is RC, but wonder why RC still has space?). I can't verify in Geokids forum as it is down now.....


686
發表於 09-3-16 21:57 |顯示全部帖子
提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽

Rank: 2


70
發表於 09-3-16 22:39 |顯示全部帖子
So what does this mean?  Who will compromise, the school or the parents?  Are there any alternatives to this?


原帖由 wisekid2007 於 09-3-16 21:57 發表
It is just rumour and GSIS hasn't signed any contract with RC nor with any school.

The information I provided is 100% correct. I am one of the parents who witnessed the EGM on last Friday and the vot ...


686
發表於 09-3-16 22:54 |顯示全部帖子
提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽

Rank: 4


684
發表於 09-3-17 02:15 |顯示全部帖子
Good news to those who don't want their kids to move, but then it leave an question is, if the school don't renovate, how can it compete with other in the future?

Rank: 2


70
發表於 09-3-17 07:06 |顯示全部帖子
Does the school need to listen to the parents?  Would they still move on to Ma On Shan regardless?




原帖由 wisekid2007 於 09-3-16 21:57 發表
It is just rumour and GSIS hasn't signed any contract with RC nor with any school.

The information I provided is 100% correct. I am one of the parents who witnessed the EGM on last Friday and the vot ...

Rank: 3Rank: 3


385
發表於 09-3-17 09:14 |顯示全部帖子
I think if you look at the issue at large, the school has the need of a larger campus.
However parents of course would not want their children to travel too far.
As someone outside GSIS, I think both sides have their merits.

BTW, for those who are interested, the RC rumours (ie, the rumours that GSIS will be using RC campus) were initiated by people with intention. They were in fact trying spread the impression that RC parents are paying all the fees and yet still have to share the campus with GSIS.

Looks like since all the admission procedures are now near the end, negative comments on RC are dying out too. Things like that happen all the time to many schools during admission time. I am so sorry to see that this time, they are using GSIS relocation plan this year as their weapon.


686
發表於 09-3-17 11:38 |顯示全部帖子
提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽


686
發表於 09-3-17 11:42 |顯示全部帖子
提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽


686
發表於 09-3-17 11:52 |顯示全部帖子
提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽

Rank: 5Rank: 5


1065
發表於 09-3-17 12:18 |顯示全部帖子
I don't for a second believe that GSIS will become less competitive as a result of the votes in the EGM.  A better campus is nice to have, but not essential to GSIS's success.


686
發表於 09-3-17 12:27 |顯示全部帖子
提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽

Rank: 2


70
發表於 09-3-17 17:21 |顯示全部帖子

回覆 # 的文章

wisekid2007,

What is your view on this?  Do you think the school will go ahead with the move?

Rank: 3Rank: 3


385
發表於 09-3-17 18:24 |顯示全部帖子
原帖由 wisekid2007 於 09-3-17 11:52 發表
Is it really true that the rumours were spread with intention?

Who will be so "無聊" to spread such rumours and why?


It is a pity that you have not changed a bit.


686
發表於 09-3-18 13:27 |顯示全部帖子
提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽


686
發表於 09-3-18 14:00 |顯示全部帖子
提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽

Rank: 2


70
發表於 09-3-19 00:21 |顯示全部帖子
Do you think the board will compromise the future of the school?   



原帖由 wisekid2007 於 09-3-18 14:00 發表
Originally, I was one of the requisitioners to try to turn down the School's plan in decanting to MOS because I have worked out an althernative plan that there might not be necessary to decant the mid ...


686
發表於 09-3-19 18:07 |顯示全部帖子
提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽