- 在線時間
- 35 小時
- 最後登錄
- 16-1-11
- 國民生產力
- 73
- 附加生產力
- 133
- 貢獻生產力
- 0
- 註冊時間
- 03-10-3
- 閱讀權限
- 10
- 帖子
- 587
- 主題
- 111
- 精華
- 0
- 積分
- 793
- UID
- 14725

|
Re: IQ test for children
Dear Dr. T,
Thanks for the advice.
But you have mistaken my words. I didn't mean to get my child tested "in order to get a cert". The misunderstanding might be caused by the word "certified" that I used. I think if I used "confirmed" is better.
The previous Raven test that he took only covers the visual, spatial, logic, non-verbal part, to my knowledge, it doesn't give a full picture. I think if he has an all-round test, such as Welscher, I can have a fuller picture of how far his potential can go.
My previous question : "Will it do him any good if he's certified gifted after testing? Can the child really benefit from having the test?" -- I meant :
(1) If he is confirmed gifted after taking the Welscher test (which I think can give a fuller and in-depth picture than Raven), will there be more directions for the parents to develop the child's potentials, so the child can benefit from them and develop his potential to the fullest? For example, if he's found to be excellent in the visual and spatial area, but rather weak in verbal area, does it imply "visual-spatial learning or teaching style" suits him more, so parents can help him adjust.
Or (2) not necessary to do the test even if the child is suspected gifted? The parents need not give him any enrichments but just let him "go with the flow" - - develop "without intervention"?? Gifted persons will find their own ways?
To be or not to be - - to test or not to test , it's the dilemma.
Anyway, thank you again. It's very nice of you to take time in answering parents' enquiries. |
|