用戶登入
用戶名稱:
密      碼:
搜索
教育王國 討論區 教育熱投 「334 新學制」,您點睇?!
發新帖
查看: 5447|回覆: 12
go

「334 新學制」,您點睇?!

Rank: 21Rank: 21Rank: 21Rank: 21Rank: 21Rank: 21

熱血金章


3018
發表於 09-2-16 17:06 |顯示全部帖子
教育局現正推行「3+3+4」高中及高等教育新學制,以3年的高中課程取代現時的4年高中課程,以1個「中學文憑考試」取代「香港中學會考」及「高級程度會考」。有關學生將於2012年應考第一屆的「中學文憑考試」,之後可按照個人成績升讀4年學士學位課程、副學位課程或就業。

您對「334 新學制」又有甚麼看法呢?
多選投票: ( 最多可選 10 項 ), 共有 76 人參與投票
9.48% (20)
20.85% (44)
20.38% (43)
6.16% (13)
2.37% (5)
3.32% (7)
10.90% (23)
14.22% (30)
10.43% (22)
1.90% (4)
你所在的用戶組沒有投票權限
教育王國 www.edu-kingdom.com

出色的教育王國父母,出色的新一代

Rank: 3Rank: 3


162
發表於 09-2-22 01:25 |顯示全部帖子
少一個公開考試
反而感覺上好似一試定生死

Rank: 3Rank: 3


162
發表於 09-2-22 19:56 |顯示全部帖子
學生選擇科目自由度增加左, 但可能會不倫不類

Rank: 4


732
發表於 09-3-11 22:28 |顯示全部帖子
The idea of NSS (334) is good. However, the feedback from frontline teachers are really mixed. Some of them complained not enough support, and some of them are overloaded with administrative works to report quantitative results back to EDB. Sometimes I really doubt there are just too many objectives and requirements in the NSS curriculum that HK teachers have a hard time to be trained to meet these over optimistic and broad objectives.

In addition, the Liberal Studies (LS) curriculum and the way that EDB/HKEA assess it will just overload the teachers. Most of the senior secondary school teachers I know they don't have enough personal experience/knowledge in the areas covered in LS (Morden China, Public Health, Energy Technology and the Environment, Hong Kong Today, Personal Development and Interpersonal Relationships). For example, if a student pick a topic on carbon capture and global warming for his Independent Enquiry Study (IES) project, I have real doubt that how many teachers in HK have experience and knowledge to coach this student in a way that his final product won't be too superficial.

Now, under NSS curriculum, science students can select less science subjects than before, plus the syllabus of the science subjects and the structure of the assessment are more or less emphasis on facts rather than reasoning (My high school chemistry teacher told me he had a F.6 student got 4As in school cert including chemistry, but he told this student not to take chemistry in A-level as he will fail after my teacher assessed his knowledge & skills. That teacher told me a student with good memory to memorize all the model answers can get A in school cert chemistry). Possibly after a few years, the general science knowledge of our kids will go much lower.

Rank: 3Rank: 3


261
發表於 09-3-16 18:37 |顯示全部帖子
每樣識d,不夠全面,張張刀,冇張利。

Rank: 3Rank: 3


418
發表於 09-3-17 01:28 |顯示全部帖子
理念很好, 但如何落實, 配套是否足夠, 會否十年後又再微調? 白老鼠捱到十年嗎? 有沒有被玩死? 現在有些小學仍然保留傳統教學, 亦有些直資或私校改行活動式教學, 是資源不同, 或是一批老鼠是受條件控制, 另一批是一般的白老鼠, 政府又搵我們的小朋友當實驗品, 十年後話你知那一種教學模式勝出, 那一種成為實驗的犧牲品...

Rank: 3Rank: 3


472
發表於 09-3-17 11:34 |顯示全部帖子
成效如何相信我們要等待第一代的學生個人表現&成就,我一直相信不是大學生才會對社會有貢獻.
我渴望理想的教育制度能做就另一位及更多位的"徐立之"先生.我是不讚成中學會考制度一試定生死,每年都有學生為這次的會考成績輕生,多可悲和可惜.
我寄望學生們能有遠視,多看國際間的時事,多閱讀充實自己.

Rank: 2


59
發表於 09-3-17 15:55 |顯示全部帖子
其实在台灣的教育制度很久之前也就是3年初中、3年高中、4年大學也沒什麽多大的問題、初中3年我們參加社團發掘自已更多的兴趣有助於自己更了解自己升高中3年選科的意向、只是香港政府在3年高中面有否給一些不愛讀書(不適合升學)的學子們另一選擇譬如(職業學校or專科職業學校)誏孩子有所去處而就讀此學校的孩子只要想考大學也有機會、這樣的教育體制、學教給予機會、社會給予包容、莘莘學子有做選擇合樂而不為呢!


355
發表於 09-3-18 12:58 |顯示全部帖子

Find the best teaching methods

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽


24
發表於 09-8-31 17:29 |顯示全部帖子
提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽

Rank: 2


48
發表於 10-2-4 13:32 |顯示全部帖子
4年大學絕對係好事!!


46
發表於 10-2-25 00:31 |顯示全部帖子
提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽

Rank: 2


57
發表於 10-8-24 23:08 |顯示全部帖子
我覺得有 [其他學習經歷] 呢個項係好好
等子女接觸更多社會事物  有助成長