- 在線時間
- 63 小時
- 最後登錄
- 11-6-13
- 國民生產力
- 54
- 附加生產力
- 0
- 貢獻生產力
- 0
- 註冊時間
- 06-7-4
- 閱讀權限
- 10
- 帖子
- 629
- 主題
- 2
- 精華
- 0
- 積分
- 683
- UID
- 90322
|
Dear big-boy, no no no ... don't be sensitive. It is just a kind of different interpretation / unintentional misuse / inappropriate application ... or whatsoever making abuse of the word of "problem". No big deal at all. In fact, lazy or naughty or misbehave or any other kinds of negative elements are to be eliminated through education. No matter how smart or how unsmart a child he / she is, he / she still has to pay attention, keep good order, work hard and learn to be smart or more smart. I believe all of us including you, mmcht and everyone expresses the views here are all holding the same thought. It is the case and we should not pinpoint at wordings but keep on giving our ideas here as well as to the school we belong to ( whichever the school our children are studying ) for the development of our children. So, keep cheers !
Back to this topic, as I said so many times before, it is meaningless and not constructive by comparing 2 schools here while the choice is always rely on oneself's individual situation. I have to but no longer want to reiterate that parents should study the schools' websites, compare the school's soft and hard wares, rate of school fees, distance and time spent on travelling to and from the schools etc. and to ask the children's opinion after physical visits paid to the schools. By asking bias opinion here is unfair to both schools.
[ 本帖最後由 KenBaBa 於 09-2-15 12:22 編輯 ] |
|