- 在線時間
- 75 小時
- 最後登錄
- 15-9-26
- 國民生產力
- 10
- 附加生產力
- 4
- 貢獻生產力
- 0
- 註冊時間
- 03-5-13
- 閱讀權限
- 10
- 帖子
- 49
- 主題
- 3
- 精華
- 0
- 積分
- 63
- UID
- 10376

|
father ho,
Thanks for the link,
Although I am kind of Anti-US(don't like their attitude towards foreign countries & their people; and the president is such a hypocrit), I still think that the Harvard education described here is exactly the type I want.
If I am hiring a fresh u-grad as my subordinate, I will definitely choose an overseas graduate over HK graduates (assume they achieve the average marks & the overseas U is not un-heard of) The training in overseas universities is just more comprehensive and more life related. Of course, the top students in HK universities are still very good, becasue they are very smart persons. I don't think HK education system can train average students into excellent graduates.
below is the extract from the introduction of the above link:
[ A Harvard education is a liberal education—that is, an education conducted in a spirit of free inquiry undertaken without concern for topical relevance or vocational utility.
This kind of learning is not only one of the enrichments of existence; it is one of the achievements of civilization. It heightens students’ awareness of the human and natural worlds they inhabit. It makes them more reflective about their beliefs and choices, more self-conscious and critical of their presuppositions and motivations, more creative in their problem-solving,more perceptive of the world around them, and more able to inform themselves about the issues that arise in their lives, personally, professionally, and socially. College is an opportunity to learn and reflect in an environment free from most of the constraints on time and energy that operate in the rest of life. ]
p.s. I am not trying to step on anybody's toes, or start an argument, just to express my point of view. |
|